COVER STORY
A SYSTEM DYNAMICS APPROACH
TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND
PERFORMANCE IN HEALTHCARE:
DYNAMIC BALANCED SCORECARD
LEVERAGED WITH CORPORATE
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Abstract
The balance scorecard (hereinafter called BSC) is a powerful concept for performance measurement.
However, it suffers from some drawbacks regarding quality of the BSC. System dynamics overcomes
these shortcomings with a Dynamic Balanced scorecard (DBS). In this article we elaborate how a
Dynamic Balanced scorecard can be used in the healthcare sector including its connectivity with
Corporate Social Responsibility as a strategy in the changed regulatory regime in India particularly
after enactment of Companies Act 2013, and section 135 and schedule VII in particular. The pandemic
of 2020 has challenged us to look into CSR not only for a facelift for the stock market but to make
the core of organizations strong. Healthcare specially will be the center of focus for coming days and
reason why our article has special focus on this sector. Sustainability measures have been researched
by scholars and it has been found that companies who factor in sustainability measures in their
performance do better (Nidumoli, 2013) than those who do not. The DBS technique is a powerful
tool to capture the CSR and sustainability measures. Our article aims at presenting a framework to
implement this in organizations in health care.
CMA Raja Ghosh
Sarojkant Singh
AGM (F&A) RE Hqs
WBSEDCL
Kolkata
rajaghosh70@rediffmail.com
Group Head Business Strategy & Risk
McNally Bharat Engg Co. Ltd.
Kolkata
saroj.singh@mbecl.co.in
Literature Survey:
ielsen, 2009) shows how return on capital
is influenced by skill, customer and work
in progress. It uses a system dynamics
framework to overcome the difficulty of
(N
32 The Management Accountant - February 2021
BSC to foresee the time lag dimension of various indicators.
(Oorschot) shows the limitations of BSC and how system
dynamics overcomes this drawback. (Ting Lin Lee1) apply
the dynamic BSC to the Taiwan pharma industry. It amends
the policy direction for enhancing future performance.
www.icmai.in
COVER STORY
(TRI GUNARSIH1, 2015, April (2016)) explains a hybrid
system dynamics and balance scorecard technique for health
sector. (LINARD) explains the dynamic interrelationships
in organization design, in particular, the interrelationships
between an organization’s profitability, internal structure ,
relationship building measures with customers and investment
in people competence. (Jackson, The Balanced Scorecard In
Healthcare) explains how a BSC is strategic to healthcare
and what harm it is for not having a strategic plan. (Robert S.
Kaplan) elaborates healthcare M&A integration.
The balanced score card
A balanced scorecard is a framework or strategy map to
implement and manage strategy. It links vision to strategic
objectives, measures and initiatives. An example given below
by Albert Einstein (Grout, 2013):
“Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more
complex. It takes a touch of genius – and a lot of courage – to
move in the opposite direction”
It is a tool with which a company can create value through 4
major perspectives of Financial, Customer Internal processes
and organizational capacity. These perspectives are both
financial and non-financial as is evident from their description.
Healthcare Sector:
The healthcare sector is a closely associated with human
interactions and the non-financial perspective take a front seat.
The goal created by a healthcare group is better organized
using a BSC (Jackson, The Balanced Scorecard In Healthcare).
In India the BSC technique is acknowledged by (Srinivasan,
2009) in Dr. Reddy Labs, BM Birla , TATA medical , Arvind
Eye Care and identification of KPIs are critical. It is still to
take –off fully in India
Performance Management and BSC
Kaplan and Norton introduced the concept of balance
score card in 2001 (Kaplan, 2001). They informed that only
financial parameters are inadequate to measure performance
of a business. A BSC is a tool easy to understand and instead
of dealing with numerous parameters now managers focus on
5 perspectives instead. It has a systemic perspective. However,
BSC is unable to distinguish delays between action and impact
on performance as it focusses on unidirectional causality.
To overcome this we use the System Dynamics approach.
(Oorschot) undertake a case study in an insurance company
and we propose a similar approach to the healthcare sector.
System Dynamics
JW Forester introduced System Dynamics in 1950’s at MIT
Sloan. Since then it has found applications in policy making
in energy, health, project management and strategy. However,
the subject is still not extensively used in industry. It is a very
powerful tool and we explain how it can be utilized in building
a Dynamic Balance Score Card. Furthermore, we extend this
to corporate social responsibility and how a dynamic balance
scorecard can be implemented as a strategic planning.
Causal Loops
System dynamics approach uses stock and flows and causal
www.icmai.in
loops to analyze a system interaction.
Figure 1: Source;https://thesystemsthinker.com/stepby-step-stocks-and-flows-converting-from-causal-loopdiagrams/
The example shows if Buying increases, Installed base
increases. Such CLDs can be linked to get a stock flow
diagram:
Figure 2: https://thesystemsthinker.com/step-by-stepstocks-and-flows-converting-from-causal-loop-diagrams/
The final CLD is obtained with the step-by-step approach;
1. Units assignment for variables ( eg nos., m3/hr etc.)
2. Identify and create stocks (potential customers/ installed
base)
3. Identify the flows (these are variables that add or
subtract the stock) (People buying products)
4. Connect the stock and flows where required.
5. Include auxiliary variables for calculation or constants.
6. Specify equations
7. Include additional variables where required.
The Dynamic Balance Score Card:
The balance score card suffers from some drawbacks. It
ignores time delay and studies static performance management.
The BSC introduces non-financial perspectives and
compensates from shortage of myopic financial measures only.
With the strategic map managers can focus on critical factors
of performance which may not be only financial. However,
the static measures have a drawback and to overcome this the
dynamic score card is useful. The system dynamics perspective
is used to develop the dynamic balanced score card.
Size of Healthcare sector and Prospects in India:
Niti Aayog has in its 2022 put up the healthcare strategy
in which priority is to public healthcare system revamp and
implement preventive healthcare (Gopal, 2019). The healthcare
February 2021 - The Management Accountant
33
COVER STORY
market is expected to reach USD 372 Billion
by 2022 (IBEF, 2020). Government has
taken initiatives of AYUSH,PPP model
and National health policy to address the
healthcare industry needs.
Balanced Scorecard & Corporate Social
Responsibility:
CSR has come
a long way from
philanthropy to a very
vital business and
corporate strategy
which is now used as
a synergy in almost
all the business round
the globe.
Corporate social responsibility (hereinafter
called CSR) is a strategy in international
businesses that aims to contribute to social
needs, goals and objectives of a philanthropic,
activist, or charitable nature by engaging in or supporting
volunteering or ethically-oriented practices. CSR has come
a long way from philanthropy to a very vital business and
corporate strategy which is now used as a synergy in almost
all the business round the globe. It is now not only a business
strategy around the world but also a mandatory requirement for
certain class of industries particularly in a developing country
like India, where only the Government cannot contribute in
all development and social development activities. What is
required is a partnership of the public and private sector in
the hitherto unattended or vital sector/areas of the economy
and the society.
In India, and in most of the countries it has been observed
that the CSR activities has been mostly concentrated in few
areas only. Healthcare and health sector has been one of
the most sectors which has received a major chunk of the
CSR expenditure in the last six to seven years. In India, CSR
expenditure includes education, healthcare, environment and
rural development. After India got liberalized, the healthcare
sector (services and facilities) has accelerated over last
20 years. Several drawbacks inflict the health sector like
lack of funding cost, asymmetry in infrastructure, lack of
human resources, absenteeism amongst doctors, deficiency
in hiring contractual staff, lack of training, low outreach,
underdeveloped and crowded hospitals, low purchasing
power by the client, lack of holistic approach and reactive
than preventive functions. (Shashi Lata Yadav, 2019) In this
context of institutional reforms, corporate level CSR function
is being given more importance by the Government O to
generate better outcomes and mitigate suffering. The TATA
group is the pioneer in this area and has been providing
assistance to NGOs in education, health care and employment
sectors. The Birla Group has developed an exemplary case in
education, health care and family welfare. The Infosys Science
Foundation is supporting cultural, rural development and
health related programmes. Mahindra & Mahindra supports
education of over 75,000 underprivileged girls via its Nanhi
Kali programme. In view of governmental limitations in many
areas, the corporate sector should contribute more towards
public health particularly in a country like India where majority
of people still are not covered under medical insurance and
lack of basic healthcare facilities down the line.
With CSR an organization can measure the 3 dimensions
of economic impact, environmental performance and social
impact. The measurement of CSR’s three dimensions is
commonly called the triple bottom line (TBL) (Scaletta).
However the measurement of CSR impact is still a matter
34 The Management Accountant - February 2021
of research and great concern amongst
the researchers and the corporates who
are involved in CSR activities. Balanced
Scorecard improves strategic alignment. In
the past, management and cost accounting
principles were exclusively relied upon
for performance measurement systems,
and with an emphasis on tangible resource
management and short-term results. Financial
metrics could do this easily, but failed to longterm value creation from intangible resources
was lacking. In the field of corporate social
responsibility (“CSR”) initiatives BSC has
been extremely useful, given that the BSC framework explicitly
incorporates and balances shareholder, customer and employee
perspectives. Researchers and commentators have advised
that combining the BSC with CSR can and should begin
with financial measures and expand to include CSR-driven
market forces (e.g., “green” consumers and energy crunch),
thus broadening the performance measurements to include the
non-financial parameters like targets taken from the Global
Reporting Initiative’s Sustainability Guidelines. Improved
quality results from insisting on supplier performance related
to environmental and social commitments and also attract
new customers that base their buying decisions on trust in
the responsible business practices of vendors.
TBL indicators are more efficiently reported by BSC since the
scorecard illustrates the cause-and-effect relationship between
being an honest corporate citizen and being a successful
business. The authors recommend that, organizations should
introduce a BSC that includes and integrates key economic
process driving CSR. The authors also suggest that using the
BSC framework, CSR initiatives can overcome resistance
among various stakeholders in business. For example,
the balanced scorecard couples cost-competitiveness and
competitive advantage, highlighting importance of investing
in new technology. BSC can also provide better ecological
protection and better risk management procedures that lowers
the organization cost of capital. A differentiation-based strategy
can also be pursued through community building activities
following the BSC metrics.
Relevance of System Dynamics:
(Nidumoli, 2013) illustrates a qualitative research on
30 Global 500 companies that use sustainability to drive
www.icmai.in
COVER STORY
business innovation published in Harvard Business Review
2009 showing that sustainable companies outperform other
companies in long run. In another research by Harvard Business
school 90 companies which volunteered environmentally and
socially sustainable practices was compared with 90 companies
which do not follow such practices. The research revealed that
sustainable companies ran their businesses differently and
outperformed in market value. For eg. a Rs. 1 Cr. investment
in 1993 for a portfolio of sustainable companies would have
increased to Rs. 22.6 Cr. by end of 2010, while that in those
without sustainability focus would yield Rs. 15.4 Cr. A stooping
47% in market share!
With a system dynamics approach we can join the aspects of
healthcare, sustainability and the balance score card measures
together. (Linard, 2020) researches with building a simulator
which helps managers understand the interrelation between
profitability and people competence , internal structure and
relation building measures with customers. Many of these
measures are coinciding with the BSC measures. It factors
the soft values in value creation. It explains about the 10
knowledge strategy issues. With a system dynamics approach
it tracks the stock of individual competence, Value adding
capacity and most wanted clients. Then it models the 10
knowledge strategies with the system dynamics approach.
The system dynamics flight simulator is thus useful for the
managing partners to assess likely pay-offs of the soft values
and strategies. (Hirsch, 2006) shows how system dynamics is
suited to handle complexity for public health issues. Hirsch
notes that system dynamics modelling can capture multiple
interacting diseases and risks, the interaction of diseased
populations and delivery systems, and national and state
policy matters. The research shows that the complete view of
population health dynamics can be extended to guide national
and state level health policies, addressing underinsurance
in population, excessive health care cost, and the under
availability of healthcare workers.
Figure 3 Hirsch 2006: A simple model of chronic disease
prevention.
Methodology:
We first build the causal loop diagrams for each perspective
of balance score card. For eg for financial perspective as
shown below:
www.icmai.in
Figure 4: Source : https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/303121822_A_hybrid_balanced_scorecard_
and_system_dynamics_for_measuring_public_sector_
performance
Similarly develop for each perspective and link them.
The final model is thus developed as depicted below:
F i g u r e 5 : h t t p s : / / w w w. r e s e a r c h g a t e . n e t /
publication/303121822_A_hybrid_balanced_scorecard_
and_system_dynamics_for_measuring_public_sector_
performance
Conclusion:
The article provides a perspective to implement a dynamic
balance score card to measure strategic performance in
healthcare industry. Corporate social responsibility can be
utilized to leverage the strategic planning and the system
dynamics model can factor in CSR into the model. CSR
is closely associated with sustainability and the dynamic
scorecard is ideally suited to capture the soft values of the
sustainability factors. The article cites why such factors are
critical for the long run for organizations. The healthcare sector
is more dependent on soft values and these factors become
more prominent for healthcare sector. The article shows how
CSR can be measured with the ideally suited BSC technique
and how the system dynamics model can build a model for
dynamic balanced score card.
Bibliography
1. Gopal, K. M. (2019). Strategies for Ensuring Quality
Health Care in India: Experiences From the Field.
Indian J Community Med., 44(1): 1–3.
2. Grout, P. (2013). Pam Grout. Retrieved from https://
February 2021 - The Management Accountant
35
COVER STORY
11.
Nielsen, S. N. (2009). The
pamgrout.com/2013/06/13/
Corporate social
Balanced Scorecard – A System
it-takes-a-touch-of-genius-andresponsibility
can
be
utilized
Dynamics Modelling Approach.
a-lot-of-courage-to-move-into leverage the strategic
Emerald Insight.
the-opposite-direction-albertplanning and the system 12. Oorschot, H. A. (n.d.).
einstein/
dynamics model can factor Developing a balanced scorecard
3. Hirsch, J. H. (2006). System
with system dynamics.
Dynamics Modeling for Public
in CSR into the model.
Health: Background and
CSR is closely associated 13. Robert S. Kaplan, P. (n.d.).
Opportunities. AMJ Public
the Balanced Scorecard
with sustainability and the Using
Health, 452-458.
for Successful Health Care M&A
dynamic scorecard is ideally Integration. Retrieved from https://
4. IBEF. (2020). Retrieved from
https://www.ibef.org/industry/
suited to capture the soft catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/
healthcare-india.aspx
values of the sustainability CAT.20.0286
14. Scaletta, C. a. (n.d.). The
5. Jackson, T. (n.d.).
factors.
Balanced Scorecard and Corporate
Retrieved from https://www.
Social Responsibility: Aligning Values
clearpointstrategy.com/
for Profit. CMA Management.
the-balanced-scorecard-in-healthcare/
15. Shashi Lata Yadav, B. V. (2019). Do health care
6. Jackson, T. (n.d.). The Balanced
companies of India fulfil government’s new
Scorecard In Healthcare. Retrieved from
orientation towards CSR activities: A special
https://www.clearpointstrategy.com/
the-balanced-scorecard-in-healthcare/
consideration towards maternal health.
16. Srinivasan, ‘. M. (2009). Balanced Score Card and
7. Kaplan, R. a. (2001). Leading change with the
balanced scorecard. . Financial Executive 17, 64-66.
its Relevance.
.
17. Ting Lin Lee1, S.-J. Y. (n.d.). Using Balanced
8. Linard, K. (2020). Building a knowledge based
Scorecard and System Dynamics in Exploring.
strategy A system dynamics approach for adding
18. TRI GUNARSIH1, C. S. (2015, April (2016)). A
value added capacity.
HYBRID BALANCED SCORECARD AND SYSTEM
9. LINARD, K. (n.d.). System Dynamics Modeling,
DYNAMICS FOR MEASURING PUBLIC SECTOR
Balanced Scorecard (BSC) & Knowledge Based
PERFORMANCE. Journal of Engineering Science
Strategy.
and Technology Special Issue on ICE & ICIE , 65
- 86.
10. Nidumoli, R. (2013). Two Birds in a tree. San
Francisco: BK Koehler.
Kind Attention !!!
Dear Students,
Expand your Knowledge with The Management Accountant - The Journal for CMAs. The Journal (ISSN
0972-3528) started its Journey in 1966. We have expanded our Readership from 1 to 94 Countries. The
Management Accountant Journal is indexed at Index Copernicus and J-gate. It is also having Global Impact
and Quality factor (2015):0.563.
The Articles incorporated here are written on current topics covering various interesting areas of Finance,
Tax, Laws, Cost & Management, Economics, Accounts, Professional Updates, Interviews of eminent
personalities, Information related to Examinations, Newly Launched courses, Placement news, etc. makes
the Journal more Student-friendly.
Kindly note: 70% Discount is available for CMA Students
•
•
If delivered via Ordinary Post - `300/- for 12 issues for registered students of the Institute
If delivered via Courier/Speed Post - `550/- for 12 issues for registered students of the Institute (`250
for Courier Charge in addition to `300)
Subscribe now: http://icmai-rnj.in/public/journals/254/images/MA_Subscription.pdf
36 The Management Accountant - February 2021
www.icmai.in