Connor Godin’s Post

Check out our monthly newsletter. Featuring: ⭐ Unmissable events at 2023 party conference season ⭐ Three things: one thing to watch, one thing to read & one thing to do ⭐ Results from last month's poll & a new question ⭐ What's coming up in September

Unveiling a Critical Crossroads: Join our Panel Discussion for Insight

This week is the final week of the first year of our 2-year session, and we plan to finish strong! Here's a recap of what we accomplished last week.

Read my Article in Storizen Media February Edition. Here is the link of the Issue https://lnkd.in/gKU7-Kdn

What better issue for your client to appear in than The New Scientist 's 2023 In Review? You can find Worldline UK&I's very own Martin Howell talking about the impact of MaaS on public transport in the UK - grab yourself a copy for a festive read! #clientnews #mobility #publictransport

Business and IT leaders face hundreds of choices with meaningful implications every day. Learn more about the art and science of decision intelligence in the latest article from InformationWeek

On Common Points of Discussion and Concern - Part Two of Four ________________________ As previously referenced in Part One, the benefits of recently considered pilot reporting legislation should, I strongly believe, extend to air, land and sea. In doing so, such domain-oriented, vetted, reporting mechanisms can assist in eventually collating a single-source, evolving, cross-referenced repository of data across the terrasphere, hydrosphere and aerosphere – with the potential of more greatly and efficiently informing our intelligence community along with congressional policy makers and, to a non-classified degree other countries and the public at large. That the recently ‘leaked’ footage of the ‘Jellyfish’ UAP leads ahead of the special IG hearing together with reporting legislation is likely no 3-way coincidence. I suspect its a common point of focus in what appears to be a pretty tightly controlled release of information overall. This approach brings together disparate interests focused on a common tangible made public via the ‘leaked’ Jellyfish video. It’s an effective way to make the news, give everyone a shared, relevant focal point and attempt to advance important legislation. The intelligence community clearly possesses a willingness to cling to secrecy, which would certainly be warranted in the genuine interest of national security. The presence of un-identifiable phenomena in our theoretically secured airspace, on land and at sea presents a litany of serious defense concerns. Among them: Can we determine UAP origins? Capabilities? Objectives? How can we communicate with them? How can we influence or defend against them - if at all? Along with warranted willingness to secret-keep, however, the intel apparatus also capitalizes on the infrastructure to support such secrecy – whether warranted or not. It is doubtful, then, that any disclosure or confirmation of UAP to any meaningful degree will occur without the intel community possessing a very compelling internal reason for doing so together with how to do it. Which may be the bigger, far more consequential story unfolding before us. Part Three of this 4-part post continues... _______________________________ Burchett’s take on the IG hearing here: “UFO hearing Friday is just to confuse, frustrate Congress: Burchett | Morning in America” https://lnkd.in/ecMDW46D ______________________________   Ryan Graves on NewsNation “UFO bill protecting pilots is 'long overdue': Ex-Navy pilot | The Hill” https://lnkd.in/eiw2bQA3   _____________________   The Graves, Grusch, Fravor Hearing from July 2023  “'Investigate these claims': UFO transparency at center of House hearing” https://lnkd.in/eqRt6Y5W ______________________ How to preview legislative language on pending Congressional bills here, via the US Library of Congress: https://lnkd.in/e22fhFTn  

New Post by Jenny B. and Dr Andrew Ross: The new wave of Access and Participation Plans – a reflection on the last 12 months https://buff.ly/3T0UW0o