- Information
- AI Chat
Was this document helpful?
Researchcub 965 4938 - Summary research methods
Course: research methods (DCC 703)
80 Documents
Students shared 80 documents in this course
University: University of Nairobi
Was this document helpful?
PDF - CREDIT RISK MODELLING TECHNIQUES FOR LIFE INSURERS - researchcub.infoCHAPTER
ONE
INTRODUCTION
Background of the study
This study examines the factors that influence the techniques of credit risk modeling for life insurers in
Nigeria - a major developing economy of sub-Sahara Africa. Credit risk is the risk of default on a debt that
may arise from a borrower failing to make required payments.In the first resort, the risk is that of the lender
and includes lost principal and interest, disruption to cash flows, and increased collection costs. The loss
may be complete or partial and can arise in a number of circumstances
Life insurance provides risk protection for low income earners and is part of the growing international micro-
finance industry that emerged in the 1970s (Churchill, 2006, 2007; Roth, McCord and Liber, 2007; Matul,
McCord, Phily and Harms, 2010). Approximately, 135 million people worldwide currently hold life-insurance
policies with annual rates of growth in some emerging markets estimated to be up to 10% per annum
(Lloyd’s of London, 2009). However, this number of life-insurance policies represents only about 2% to 3%
of the potential market (Swiss Re, 2010 p.9). By protecting low income groups from the vulnerability of loss
and shocks, life-insurance is increasingly being spouted as a formalized risk management solution to world
poverty and a key driver of economic growth and entrepreneurial development in low income countries such
as those of west Africa (Churchill, Phillips and Reinhard, 2011).
Over the last decade, a number of the world’s major banks have developed sophisticated systems to
quantify and aggregate credit risk across geographical and product lines. The initial interest in credit risk
models stemmed from the desire to develop more rigorous quantitative estimates of the amount of economic
capital needed to support a bank’s risktaking activities. As the outputs of credit risk models have assumed
an increasingly large role in the risk management processes of large banking institutions, the issue of their
potential applicability for supervisory and regulatory purposes has also gained prominence. This review
highlighted the wide range of practices both in the methodology used to develop the models and in the
internal applications of the models’ output.
This exercise also underscored a number of challenges and limitations to current modeling practices. From
a supervisory perspective, the development of modeling methodology and the consequent improvements in
the rigor and consistency of credit risk measurement hold significant appeal. These improvements in risk
management may, according to national discretion, be acknowledged in supervisors’ assessment of banks’
internal controls and risk management practices. From a regulatory perspective, the flexibility of models in
responding to changes in the economic environment and innovations in financial products may reduce the
incentive for banks to engage in regulatory capital arbitrage. Furthermore, a models-based approach may
also bring capital requirements into closer alignment with the perceived riskiness of underlying assets, and
may produce estimates of credit risk that better reflect the composition of each bank’s portfolio. However,
before a portfolio modeling approach could be used in the formal process of setting regulatory capital
requirements, regulators would have to beconfident that models are not only well integrated with banks’ day-
to-day credit risk management, but are also conceptually sound, empirically validated, and produce capital
requirements that are comparable across institutions.
Statement of the general problem