Dredge Management Guidelines - the BIEAP and FREMP Website
Dredge Management Guidelines - the BIEAP and FREMP Website
Dredge Management Guidelines - the BIEAP and FREMP Website
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Dredge</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong><br />
G u i d e l i n e s
3<br />
4<br />
6<br />
9<br />
9<br />
9<br />
10<br />
10<br />
11<br />
11<br />
11<br />
15<br />
15<br />
16<br />
16<br />
16<br />
19<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
21<br />
25<br />
27<br />
37<br />
41<br />
43<br />
45<br />
47<br />
53<br />
55<br />
57<br />
59<br />
61<br />
63<br />
Table of Contents<br />
Glossary<br />
Acronyms<br />
Part 1: Introduction<br />
The Fraser River<br />
The Fraser River Estuary <strong>Management</strong> Program <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Estuary <strong>Management</strong> Plan<br />
The Rise of Dredging as an issue<br />
Guiding Principles for Dredging Task Group<br />
Task Group conclusions<br />
Purpose of this document<br />
Structure of this document<br />
How this document will affect dredging projects<br />
Part 2: The Fraser River Sediment Budget <strong>and</strong> S<strong>and</strong> Registry<br />
What is a Sediment Budget?<br />
The area <strong>the</strong> Budget covers<br />
How <strong>the</strong> Budget is determined<br />
What is <strong>the</strong> S<strong>and</strong> Registry <strong>and</strong> what is its role?<br />
What <strong>the</strong> Registry Contains<br />
Part 3: The Application Process<br />
Dredging <strong>and</strong> Project Review in <strong>the</strong> Estuary<br />
Overview<br />
Project Review Process for Dredging<br />
Engaging in <strong>the</strong> Project Review Process<br />
Application requirements<br />
Appendices<br />
Map 1 Agency Jurisdictions<br />
Map 2 to 6 Deep Sea Navigation Channel Maps<br />
Appendix 1 Project Review in <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Estuary<br />
Appendix 2 Environmental Dredging <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>the</strong> Lower Fraser<br />
Appendix 3 Fraser River Port Authority Transfer Pit Operating <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />
Appendix 4 Upl<strong>and</strong> Disposal Requirements<br />
Appendix 5 Interim Contaminant Testing <strong>Guidelines</strong> For Ocean Disposal, Pacific <strong>and</strong> Yukon Region<br />
Appendix 6 Fraser River Hydrographic Survey <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />
Appendix 7 Fraser River Hydraulic Study Requirements<br />
Appendix 8 Future Habitat Inventory Requirements<br />
Appendix 9 Particle Size Analysis <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />
Appendix 10 <strong>Dredge</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Advisory Committee Terms of Reference<br />
Appendix 11 Dredging Application Form
Glossary<br />
Glossary<br />
“Arms” of <strong>the</strong> Fraser<br />
There are four “arms” of <strong>the</strong> Fraser River as shown on Map 1<br />
· The North Arm running north of Sea Isl<strong>and</strong> from <strong>the</strong> trifurcation at New Westminster;<br />
· The Middle Arm running off <strong>the</strong> North Arm <strong>and</strong> flowing south of Sea Isl<strong>and</strong>;<br />
· The South Arm running south from <strong>the</strong> trifurcation at New Westminster, often referred to as <strong>the</strong><br />
Main Stem for navigational purposes; <strong>and</strong><br />
· The Main Arm which carries all waters flowing from <strong>the</strong> region upstream of <strong>the</strong> New Westminster trifurcation.<br />
Authorization<br />
Any document issued by <strong>the</strong> Lead Agency authority to undertake dredging.<br />
Available S<strong>and</strong><br />
The non-dredged volume of <strong>the</strong> annual allowable sediment budget for <strong>the</strong> Fraser River as established<br />
by <strong>the</strong> responsible agencies.<br />
Borrow Dredging<br />
Dredging for <strong>the</strong> purposes of providing material to be used for commercial purposes (as fill or construction<br />
materials at ano<strong>the</strong>r location).<br />
Coarse S<strong>and</strong><br />
See definition under “s<strong>and</strong>”.<br />
Coordinated Project Review (CPR)<br />
The process through <strong>FREMP</strong> whereby all development applications are reviewed in t<strong>and</strong>em by all<br />
appropriate regulatory agencies.<br />
Deep Sea Channel<br />
Length/width/depth of <strong>the</strong> deep sea channel as defined on <strong>the</strong> maps in this document.<br />
Dredging<br />
Removal of sediments from <strong>the</strong> riverbed.<br />
Estuary<br />
The region in which fresh <strong>and</strong> salt water mix when a river meets <strong>the</strong> sea.<br />
Fine S<strong>and</strong><br />
See definition under S<strong>and</strong>.<br />
Gravel<br />
See definition under S<strong>and</strong>.<br />
Lead Agency<br />
Any body which has <strong>the</strong> responsibility for issuing dredging permits. In <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Estuary downstream<br />
of Kanaka Creek, <strong>the</strong> Agencies will be one of: <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Port Authority, <strong>the</strong> North Fraser<br />
Port Authority, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> B.C. Assets <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Corporation.<br />
Navigation Channel<br />
Any channel used for vessel traffic.<br />
Regulatory Agency<br />
Any government body that has legal authority to set regulations related to dredging. The regulatory<br />
agencies are: Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Oceans Canada (both Canadian Coast Guard <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Habitat <strong>and</strong><br />
Enhancement Branch); Environment Canada; <strong>the</strong> Ministry of Environment, L<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Parks; <strong>the</strong> British<br />
Columbia Assets <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Corporation; <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Port Authority; <strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong> North Fraser Port<br />
Authority.<br />
4 Glossary
S<strong>and</strong><br />
Material of a particular grain size that is deposited on <strong>the</strong> riverbed. In <strong>the</strong> Fraser River, s<strong>and</strong> (also<br />
referred to as coarse s<strong>and</strong>) is considered to be any material that has a grain size between 0.177mm <strong>and</strong><br />
2.00mm. Material larger than 2.00mm is referred to as gravel. Material finer than 0.177mm is referred<br />
to as fine s<strong>and</strong>. Also called wash load, this fine material does not deposit in <strong>the</strong> river; it is carried out of<br />
<strong>the</strong> river system <strong>and</strong> deposits on s<strong>and</strong>banks beyond <strong>the</strong> mouth of <strong>the</strong> river. The term s<strong>and</strong> is often used<br />
interchangeably with <strong>the</strong> term sediment. In <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> area, <strong>the</strong> budget measures deposits <strong>and</strong><br />
removals of material between 0.177mm <strong>and</strong> 2.00mm.<br />
S<strong>and</strong>heads<br />
Kilometre marker 0.0: <strong>the</strong> seaward end of <strong>the</strong> South Arm Navigation Channel.<br />
S<strong>and</strong> Registry<br />
A database located at <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> office <strong>and</strong> which contains a yearly record of <strong>the</strong> date <strong>and</strong> amount of<br />
coarse s<strong>and</strong> (see definition under S<strong>and</strong>) deposited <strong>and</strong>/or removed <strong>and</strong>/or redistributed within <strong>the</strong><br />
river.<br />
Sediment<br />
A general term to describe all material deposited on <strong>the</strong> river bottom. Sediment may be composed of<br />
fine s<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>/or coarse s<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>/or gravel (see definition for S<strong>and</strong> above).<br />
Sediment Budget<br />
A measure of <strong>the</strong> net change in sediment stored in <strong>the</strong> river as a function of total inflow of sediment at<br />
Mission less <strong>the</strong> outflow into Georgia Strait. The sediment budget in any year represents <strong>the</strong> maximum<br />
permissible amount of material that may be removed from <strong>the</strong> estuary for any reason. In <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong><br />
area, <strong>the</strong> budget measures deposits of material between 0.177mm <strong>and</strong> 2.00mm.<br />
Wash Load<br />
For <strong>the</strong> Fraser River, any sediment with a particle size smaller than 0.063mm.<br />
5 Glossary
Acronyms<br />
Acronyms<br />
BCAL British Columbia Assets <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Corporation<br />
CCG Canadian Coast Guard<br />
CPR Coordinated Project Review<br />
CWS Canadian Wildlife Service<br />
DFO Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Oceans Canada<br />
DMAC <strong>Dredge</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Advisory Committee<br />
EC Environment Canada<br />
ERC Environmental Review Committee<br />
<strong>FREMP</strong> Fraser River Estuary <strong>Management</strong> Program<br />
FRPA Fraser River Port Authority<br />
MELP Ministry of Environment, L<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Parks<br />
NFPA North Fraser Port Authority<br />
PWGSC Public Works <strong>and</strong> Government Services Canada<br />
RODAC Regional Ocean Disposal Advisory Committee<br />
WLUC Water <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Use Committee<br />
6 Acronyms
Part 1: Introduction<br />
1
The Fraser River<br />
The Fraser River Estuary is a natural resource that is home to some of <strong>the</strong> most productive biological<br />
systems in <strong>the</strong> world. In addition, <strong>the</strong> river serves as an important transportation route for British<br />
Columbians <strong>and</strong> plays a key role in <strong>the</strong> economy of one of North America’s fastest growing metropolitan<br />
areas.<br />
The Fraser River Estuary <strong>Management</strong> Program <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Estuary <strong>Management</strong> Plan<br />
<strong>FREMP</strong> is a partnership among federal, provincial, <strong>and</strong> regional government bodies that has been<br />
established to foster coordinated <strong>and</strong> sustainable management of activities in <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Estuary<br />
(from S<strong>and</strong>heads to Kanaka Creek <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> mouth of Pitt Lake). <strong>FREMP</strong> was established in 1985 <strong>and</strong><br />
exp<strong>and</strong>ed in 1991. <strong>FREMP</strong> is now a partnership among:<br />
· Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Oceans Canada;<br />
· Environment Canada;<br />
· <strong>the</strong> Ministry of Environment, L<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Parks;<br />
· <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Port Authority;<br />
· <strong>the</strong> North Fraser Port Authority; <strong>and</strong><br />
· <strong>the</strong> Greater Vancouver Regional District.<br />
<strong>FREMP</strong>’s work is guided by <strong>FREMP</strong>’s Estuary <strong>Management</strong> Plan (EMP). Entitled A Living Working River,<br />
<strong>the</strong> EMP outlines a shared vision, goals, <strong>and</strong> action plan for improving <strong>the</strong> environmental, economic,<br />
<strong>and</strong> social health of <strong>the</strong> Fraser River estuary. The plan was developed with input <strong>and</strong> support from a<br />
variety of stakeholders, including private residents, l<strong>and</strong> owners, industry <strong>and</strong> business associations,<br />
environmental advocacy groups, federal <strong>and</strong> provincial government agencies, municipalities, First<br />
Nations, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Greater Vancouver Regional District. It contains a number of tools – Area<br />
Designations, <strong>the</strong> habitat classification system, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Coordinated Project Review Process – that<br />
enable <strong>FREMP</strong> partners to deliver on <strong>the</strong> goals <strong>and</strong> actions in <strong>the</strong> EMP. <strong>FREMP</strong>’s plan reflects a consensus<br />
among a broad range of stakeholders concerning how <strong>the</strong> water, shoreline <strong>and</strong> upl<strong>and</strong> resources in<br />
<strong>the</strong> estuary should be managed.<br />
The EMP contains an Action Program on Navigation <strong>and</strong> Dredging. A key target of this action program is<br />
to “manage <strong>the</strong> removal of s<strong>and</strong> from <strong>the</strong> river in a manner that balances with <strong>the</strong> sediment budget of<br />
<strong>the</strong> river system”.<br />
The Rise of Dredging as an issue<br />
Dredging has been an issue for many years. With <strong>the</strong> continued dem<strong>and</strong> by <strong>the</strong> shipping industry for<br />
navigation channel maintenance <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> increased dem<strong>and</strong> by <strong>the</strong> construction industry for dredged<br />
material, it has become clear to agencies responsible for managing <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Estuary that better<br />
tools <strong>and</strong> practices for managing dredging are needed.<br />
In 1996, <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> Water <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Use Committee charged a Task Group to develop guidelines for<br />
dredging in <strong>the</strong> Fraser River estuary which accommodate <strong>the</strong> need for continued navigation (<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
needs of <strong>the</strong> construction industry to <strong>the</strong> extent possible) while maintaining <strong>the</strong> environmental <strong>and</strong><br />
structural integrity of <strong>the</strong> estuary as a whole, as a means to deliver on <strong>the</strong> EMP target.<br />
9 Part 1: Introduction
Guiding Principles for Dredging Task Group<br />
In scoping <strong>the</strong> issues associated with developing <strong>the</strong> budget <strong>and</strong> reviewing existing guidelines, <strong>the</strong><br />
Task Group used <strong>the</strong> following principles to guide <strong>the</strong>ir deliberations.<br />
Dredging must be managed to ensure that:<br />
· habitat values <strong>and</strong> fishery resources are preserved. This will involve continued habitat protection<br />
<strong>and</strong> enhancement throughout <strong>the</strong> estuary.<br />
· navigation channels are maintained in such a way that reliable channel depths are available on a<br />
consistent basis to serve <strong>the</strong> evolving coastal <strong>and</strong> deep sea shipping markets. This will require a<br />
managed dredging program.<br />
· industry’s dem<strong>and</strong> for s<strong>and</strong> is met on an environmentally sustainable basis. This will require monitoring<br />
sediment inflow <strong>and</strong> controlling s<strong>and</strong> withdrawals on an annual basis in order to evaluate <strong>the</strong><br />
effects of dredging <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r development activities.<br />
· disposal of contaminated dredge material is properly managed <strong>and</strong> appropriate upl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> offshore<br />
disposal sites are used. Testing of dredge material for contaminants using defined testing<br />
procedures <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards will be needed to assess <strong>the</strong> impacts <strong>and</strong> fate of contaminants that may<br />
be found.<br />
· public health <strong>and</strong> safety needs are met. This will require that all efforts are taken to maintain <strong>the</strong><br />
structural integrity of utility crossings <strong>and</strong> river dykes.<br />
Task Group Conclusions<br />
In order to better assess <strong>and</strong> manage dredging projects in <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> Area of Interest, <strong>the</strong> Task Group<br />
recommended that:<br />
· annual sediment budgets be established to guide dredging activities;<br />
· annual reports be produced describing <strong>the</strong> previous year’s dredging activity. This requires <strong>the</strong> ability<br />
to track removals through a S<strong>and</strong> “registry”.<br />
· that a technical group be made available to advise <strong>FREMP</strong>’s ERC on <strong>the</strong> technical merits of any proposal,<br />
as needed.<br />
The <strong>Dredge</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Advisory Committee is now responsible for <strong>the</strong>se tasks. Their Terms of<br />
Reference are included in <strong>the</strong> appendices to this document.<br />
10 Part 1: Introduction
1 The regulatory agencies<br />
are: Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Oceans<br />
Canada (both Canadian<br />
Coast Guard <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Habitat<br />
<strong>and</strong> Enhancement<br />
Branch); Environment<br />
Canada; <strong>the</strong> Ministry of<br />
Environment, L<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong><br />
Parks; <strong>the</strong> British Columbia<br />
Assets <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Corporation;<br />
<strong>the</strong> Fraser River Port<br />
Authority; <strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong> North<br />
Fraser Port Authority.<br />
Purpose of this Document<br />
The purpose of this document is to:<br />
1 provide a framework for managing sediment removals to work towards sustainability;<br />
2 describe <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> Sediment Budget;<br />
3 describe <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> S<strong>and</strong> Registry; <strong>and</strong><br />
4 compile <strong>the</strong> guidelines <strong>and</strong> regulations of agencies responsible for dredging in <strong>the</strong> Fraser River.<br />
Structure of this document<br />
These guidelines are intended to provide <strong>the</strong> dredging industry <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs with information on <strong>the</strong> new<br />
sediment budget <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> existing guidelines for dredging in <strong>the</strong> Fraser River. The document is organized<br />
as follows:<br />
Part I <strong>the</strong> sediment budget, how it will be developed, <strong>and</strong> how <strong>the</strong> amount of future dredging within<br />
<strong>the</strong> estuary will be determined;<br />
Part II <strong>the</strong> existing dredging application process <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> types of information that are expected from<br />
dredging applicants; <strong>and</strong><br />
Appendices <strong>the</strong> existing guidelines <strong>and</strong> regulations of agencies responsible for dredging in Fraser<br />
River.<br />
How this document will affect dredging projects<br />
The new sediment budget process outlined in this document, when coupled with <strong>the</strong> existing guidelines<br />
found in <strong>the</strong> appendices to this document, will move <strong>FREMP</strong> partners a significant step towards<br />
<strong>the</strong> goal of balancing s<strong>and</strong> removals with <strong>the</strong> river’s sediment budget.<br />
Note that this document does not change <strong>the</strong> existing agency guidelines (which are found in <strong>the</strong><br />
appendices to this document) that have been developed by <strong>the</strong> various regulatory agencies responsible<br />
for dredging in <strong>the</strong> Fraser River. It merely establishes a process for setting <strong>the</strong> limit on how much<br />
material may be removed from <strong>the</strong> river.<br />
At some future date, regulatory agencies may develop additional guidelines governing dredging in<br />
order to limit impacts on habitat or o<strong>the</strong>r impacts associated with dredging.<br />
The material contained in this report reflects a consensus among <strong>the</strong> regulatory agencies 1<br />
regarding<br />
<strong>the</strong> general approach to dredging within <strong>the</strong> estuary. Individual projects, however, will continue to be<br />
reviewed on <strong>the</strong>ir own merits. Special exceptions to <strong>the</strong> budget may be made for emergency navigation,<br />
health, or safety reasons.<br />
11 Part 1: Introduction
2<br />
Part 2: The Fraser River Sediment Budget <strong>and</strong> S<strong>and</strong> Registry
2 Upstream of Kanaka<br />
Creek <strong>the</strong> appropriate<br />
authority is BCAL. <strong>FREMP</strong><br />
is not usually involved in<br />
<strong>the</strong>se applications. Any<br />
sediment removed<br />
upstream of Kanaka Creek<br />
must be authorized by<br />
BCAL on a case-by-case<br />
basis. Such removals will<br />
be factored in when setting<br />
<strong>the</strong> downstream budget.<br />
What is a Sediment Budget?<br />
A sediment budget for <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Estuary is a measure of <strong>the</strong> net change in sediment stored in <strong>the</strong><br />
river as a function of total inflow of sediment at Mission minus <strong>the</strong> outflow into Georgia Strait. The<br />
objective of <strong>the</strong> budget is to manage removal of s<strong>and</strong> from <strong>the</strong> River on a sustainable basis. At present,<br />
that means that it will be managed to ensure that annual removals will not result, on average, in a net<br />
change (degradation or aggradation) to <strong>the</strong> shape of <strong>the</strong> river bed.<br />
The Fraser River Estuary sediment budget will measure <strong>and</strong> budget deposits <strong>and</strong> removals of coarse<br />
s<strong>and</strong>. As indicated in <strong>the</strong> glossary, coarse s<strong>and</strong> (often referred to simply as s<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> sometimes<br />
referred to as sediment) is material that has a grain size between 0.177 <strong>and</strong> 2.00mm. Material smaller<br />
than this size does not generally deposit in <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> area in large quantities; material larger than<br />
2.00mm (usually referred to as gravel) generally deposits upstream of <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> area of interest <strong>and</strong><br />
is thus not being covered by <strong>FREMP</strong> work.<br />
The area <strong>the</strong> Sediment Budget covers<br />
The budget is calculated based on <strong>the</strong> amount of coarse s<strong>and</strong> entering <strong>and</strong> depositing in <strong>the</strong> Fraser<br />
River below Mission.<br />
The amount of material that may be removed according to <strong>the</strong> budget is counted as a removal from <strong>the</strong><br />
system regardless of where it is removed. Specifically, material removed from upstream of <strong>the</strong> Patullo<br />
Bridge will reduce <strong>the</strong> amount of material available for removal downstream of <strong>the</strong> Patullo bridge.<br />
Generally speaking, material may only be removed from <strong>the</strong> navigation channel (i.e. <strong>the</strong> deep sea channel<br />
downstream of <strong>the</strong> Patullo Bridge) unless an environmental assessment demonstrates to <strong>the</strong><br />
satisfaction of <strong>the</strong> environmental agencies responsible for dredging that no adverse impacts (or no<br />
unacceptable adverse impacts) result from <strong>the</strong> removal. Necessary data have not been analyzed to<br />
establish a budget for <strong>the</strong> North Arm. Fur<strong>the</strong>r work will be required to develop a budget for this portion<br />
of <strong>the</strong> river.<br />
Generally speaking, material should only be removed where it is actively deposited each year unless an<br />
environmental assessment demonstrates to <strong>the</strong> satisfaction of <strong>the</strong> environmental agencies responsible<br />
for dredging that no adverse impacts (or no unacceptable adverse impacts) result from <strong>the</strong> removal.<br />
Any proposed s<strong>and</strong> removal outside <strong>the</strong> deep sea channel between S<strong>and</strong>heads <strong>and</strong> Port Mann <strong>and</strong> any<br />
proposed removal in <strong>the</strong> North <strong>and</strong> Middle Arms or between Port Mann <strong>and</strong> Kanaka Creek 2<br />
will be<br />
reviewed through <strong>FREMP</strong> on a case-by-case basis. <strong>FREMP</strong> will take into consideration <strong>the</strong> s<strong>and</strong> allocations<br />
for adjacent areas of <strong>the</strong> deep sea channel. Successful projects outside <strong>the</strong> deep sea channel will,<br />
as indicated above, be counted as withdrawals from <strong>the</strong> sediment budget <strong>and</strong> may change <strong>the</strong> amount<br />
of s<strong>and</strong> available in o<strong>the</strong>r reaches.<br />
15 Part 2: The Fraser River Sediment Budget <strong>and</strong> S<strong>and</strong> Registry
3 For more detailed information<br />
please see Lower<br />
Fraser River Sediment Budget<br />
Analysis: Final Report<br />
(Northwest Hydraulic<br />
Consultants, Feb 1999)<br />
available through <strong>FREMP</strong>.<br />
How <strong>the</strong> Sediment Budget is determined 3<br />
A sediment budget for any reach of <strong>the</strong> Lower Fraser River may be written as:<br />
S out = S in – S dredge + S spoil - ∆S channel where :<br />
The sediment monitoring station is at Mission. The predicted sediment budget will be calculated for<br />
<strong>the</strong> river each year with <strong>the</strong> objective of using <strong>the</strong> budget to manage for <strong>the</strong> long-term sustainability of<br />
<strong>the</strong> river. The budget period will be calculated on a calendar year but will be adjusted to reflect <strong>the</strong> fact<br />
that a “dredging year” extends from August of one year to March of <strong>the</strong> following year.<br />
∆S channel<br />
S in<br />
S dredge<br />
S out<br />
S spoil<br />
What is <strong>the</strong> S<strong>and</strong> Registry <strong>and</strong> What is its Role?<br />
The Registry is a database containing records of <strong>the</strong> amount of s<strong>and</strong> removed <strong>and</strong>/or added to <strong>the</strong> river<br />
each year. The Registry is maintained by <strong>FREMP</strong> at <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> office.<br />
The Registry will help monitor dredging performance against <strong>the</strong> budget in order to ensure that sediment<br />
removal remains within <strong>the</strong> river’s budget. The Registry will also be used to refine periodically <strong>the</strong><br />
dredging budget to ensure that <strong>the</strong> model continues to reflect <strong>the</strong> hydrological reality in <strong>the</strong> river. The<br />
Registry will occasionally be able to identify when excess s<strong>and</strong> may be available for use by various<br />
industries. An example of when this might occur would be a year in which a large flood was expected.<br />
What <strong>the</strong> Registry Contains<br />
The Registry will contain <strong>the</strong> following information:<br />
■ number of dredging licenses issued;<br />
Definition<br />
■ actual amount of sediment removed;<br />
■ date <strong>and</strong> location from which sediment was removed;<br />
■ particle size distribution of removed sediment; <strong>and</strong><br />
■ date, location, <strong>and</strong> type of disposal used.<br />
The net change in navigation channel<br />
storage of sediment expressed<br />
as bed accretion or degradation<br />
Sediment inflow to <strong>the</strong> study area<br />
The net mass of sediment dredged<br />
from <strong>the</strong> study area<br />
The natural sediment outflow from<br />
<strong>the</strong> study area<br />
The quantity of material deposited<br />
or disposed of in <strong>the</strong> river<br />
Information Source<br />
To be determined from <strong>the</strong> annual<br />
River surveys<br />
To be based on suspended sediment<br />
data records collected at<br />
Mission. The sediment outflow from<br />
one reach will be <strong>the</strong> sediment<br />
inflow to <strong>the</strong> next downstream<br />
reach<br />
To be determined from permits<br />
received <strong>and</strong> reported by project<br />
proponents<br />
To be calculated from <strong>the</strong> equation<br />
To be determined from permits<br />
received <strong>and</strong> reported by project<br />
proponents<br />
16 Part 2: The Fraser River Sediment Budget <strong>and</strong> S<strong>and</strong> Registry
Part 3: The Application Process<br />
3
3 The Coordinated Project<br />
Review process is being<br />
revised <strong>and</strong> this section<br />
will be updated when <strong>the</strong><br />
process is complete.<br />
4 The <strong>FREMP</strong> Area of<br />
Interest includes <strong>the</strong> Main,<br />
North, Middle <strong>and</strong> South<br />
Arms of <strong>the</strong> Fraser River<br />
downstream of Kanaka<br />
Creek, <strong>the</strong> Pitt River downstream<br />
of Pitt Lake, <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> entire outer banks<br />
from Point Grey to <strong>the</strong><br />
US Border. It also includes<br />
Boundary, Semiahmoo,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Mud Bays as well as<br />
<strong>the</strong> Serpentine <strong>and</strong><br />
Nicomekl Rivers upstream<br />
to <strong>the</strong> sea dams on<br />
each river.<br />
Dredging <strong>and</strong> Project Review in <strong>the</strong> Estuary<br />
Any project that has <strong>the</strong> potential to affect <strong>the</strong> Fraser River is already subject to <strong>the</strong> approval of a<br />
variety of regulatory agencies. For instance:<br />
■ Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Oceans Canada (Habitat <strong>and</strong> Enhancement Branch) is responsible for ensuring that<br />
fish <strong>and</strong> fish habitat are protected.<br />
■ Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Oceans Canada (Canada Coast Guard) ensures that navigable waters are protected.<br />
■ Environment Canada regulates ocean disposal.<br />
■ Ministry of Environment L<strong>and</strong>s & Parks is also responsible for ensuring that fish <strong>and</strong> fish habitat are<br />
protected <strong>and</strong> is responsible for regulating <strong>the</strong> environmental quality of sediments disposed on<br />
Crown <strong>and</strong> private l<strong>and</strong>.<br />
■ British Columbia Assets & L<strong>and</strong> Corporation is responsible for all upl<strong>and</strong>, foreshore, <strong>and</strong> riverbed<br />
Crown L<strong>and</strong>, including issuing dredging permits upstream of Kanaka Creek, <strong>and</strong> is responsible for<br />
tenuring disposal of sediment on Crown l<strong>and</strong>.<br />
■ The Port Authorities (<strong>the</strong> North Fraser Port Authority <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Port Authority) are responsible<br />
for managing port activities, port properties, l<strong>and</strong>s granted to <strong>the</strong>m by <strong>the</strong> federal <strong>and</strong><br />
provincial governments, channel maintenance, <strong>and</strong> issuing dredging permits downstream of Kanaka<br />
Creek.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> Area of Interest 4<br />
, <strong>FREMP</strong> coordinates <strong>the</strong> environmental review of all dredging projects.<br />
Any person or organization interested in undertaking a project that may have an environmental impact<br />
on <strong>the</strong> river must proceed through <strong>the</strong> Coordinated Review process.<br />
The guidelines <strong>and</strong> regulations of agencies responsible for dredging in <strong>the</strong> Fraser River are found in <strong>the</strong><br />
Appendices. During <strong>the</strong> Coordinated Project Review process <strong>the</strong> various agency representatives refer<br />
to <strong>the</strong>se documents when assessing dredging proposals.<br />
Overview<br />
The following flow diagram outlines <strong>the</strong> general application <strong>and</strong> environmental review process for<br />
dredging projects in <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> area. This process is discussed at greater length in <strong>the</strong> appendices.<br />
Lead Agencies are outlined in <strong>the</strong> glossary <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> appendices.<br />
19 Part 3: The Application Process
Project Review Process for Dredging<br />
Proponent <strong>and</strong>/or Lead Agency<br />
checks with <strong>FREMP</strong> to determine<br />
possible s<strong>and</strong> location <strong>and</strong> availability<br />
Pre-application discussions with<br />
<strong>FREMP</strong> ERC if appropriate<br />
Formal Application to <strong>FREMP</strong><br />
through Lead Agency<br />
Lead Agency refers application<br />
to ERC members for review<br />
▲<br />
▲<br />
▲<br />
▲<br />
Comments received<br />
▲<br />
ERC Recommendations<br />
▲<br />
<strong>FREMP</strong> coordinates<br />
Environmental Response to Lead<br />
Agency<br />
▲<br />
Lead Agency Decision<br />
Statements returned to<br />
Applicant<br />
▲<br />
Proponent applies to Lead<br />
Agency for Dredging Permit<br />
Application made available for<br />
public review <strong>and</strong> comment<br />
Project Rejected Project proceeds with modifications<br />
Projects subject to blanket<br />
approval conditions are not<br />
referred to ERC<br />
Lead Agency approves project<br />
subject to blanket approval conditions<br />
Project proceeds<br />
Environmental monitoring (as<br />
appropriate)<br />
20 Part 3: The Application Process<br />
▲<br />
▲<br />
▲<br />
▲<br />
▲ ▲
Engaging in <strong>the</strong> Project Review Process<br />
When you are applying for a dredging permit, you must:<br />
1 Fill out <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> Common Application Form, available at <strong>the</strong> Lead Agency <strong>and</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> offices.<br />
2 Submit completed application to <strong>the</strong> appropriate Lead Agency. To determine <strong>the</strong> appropriate Lead<br />
Agency, see Appendix 1.<br />
Application requirements<br />
Depending on <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>and</strong> location of <strong>the</strong> proposed project, <strong>the</strong> Lead Agency will follow one of two<br />
procedures <strong>and</strong> require one of <strong>the</strong> two following sets of information:<br />
Dredging in <strong>the</strong> Deep Sea Channel<br />
The horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical limits of <strong>the</strong> deep sea<br />
channel are defined on <strong>the</strong> maps in this document<br />
In <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> area, a general environmental<br />
approval for dredging projects in <strong>the</strong> deep sea channel<br />
may be held by <strong>the</strong> authorizing agency or<br />
agencies for a specified term. When applying to<br />
dredge in <strong>the</strong>se areas, proponents must provide <strong>the</strong><br />
authorizing agency with:<br />
■ <strong>the</strong> location to be dredged;<br />
■ <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>and</strong> type of material to be dredged;<br />
■ hydrographic survey information for <strong>the</strong> period<br />
following <strong>the</strong> most recent freshet; <strong>and</strong><br />
■ biological impact assessments.<br />
Post-Approval Requirements<br />
Once a dredging project is approved, proponents are<br />
expected to meet permit or license requirements<br />
<strong>and</strong> royalty payments as stipulated in <strong>the</strong> dredging<br />
authorization. Exceeding <strong>the</strong> boundaries may be<br />
subject to penalties imposed by authorizing agencies.<br />
Proponents may be required to conduct<br />
post-dredge surveys to demonstrate compliance<br />
with <strong>the</strong>ir permit or license.<br />
Dredging Elsewhere<br />
Any dredging proposal that: is outside <strong>the</strong> deep sea<br />
channel; or, is destined for upl<strong>and</strong> disposal sites; or,<br />
is destined for an unapproved transfer pit, will be<br />
subject to an individual review by <strong>FREMP</strong>’s<br />
Environmental Review Committee (which may also<br />
consult <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dredge</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Advisory<br />
Committee). For <strong>the</strong>se projects, proponents may be<br />
required to provide additional information. This may<br />
include:<br />
■ pre-dredge hydrographic information;<br />
■ hydraulic information;<br />
■ habitat inventories; <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
■ contaminant studies.<br />
For <strong>the</strong>se projects, it is suggested that proponents<br />
meet with <strong>the</strong> ERC prior to submitting an application<br />
(a “pre-application meeting”) to discuss <strong>the</strong> nature<br />
of <strong>the</strong> project.<br />
Post-Approval Requirements<br />
Post-dredge surveys may also be required. The timing<br />
of <strong>the</strong>se surveys will be determined by <strong>the</strong> ERC.<br />
Proponents must meet permit or license requirements<br />
<strong>and</strong> royalty payments as stipulated in <strong>the</strong><br />
dredging authorization. A performance bond may be<br />
required to ensure satisfactory completion of dredging<br />
works.<br />
21 Part 3: The Application Process
In ei<strong>the</strong>r case, <strong>the</strong> proponent is responsible for:<br />
■ identifying, through <strong>the</strong> pre-application process, that a sustainable s<strong>and</strong> load is available for<br />
removal;<br />
■ demonstrating that <strong>the</strong> project meets <strong>the</strong> applicable guidelines intended to ensure mitigation of<br />
negative environmental impacts;<br />
■ ensuring that <strong>the</strong> material meets <strong>the</strong> applicable st<strong>and</strong>ards for transfer pit storage, upl<strong>and</strong> use,<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or ocean disposal as required <strong>and</strong> obtaining applicable disposal permits;<br />
■ ensuring that all necessary permits have been received prior to commencement of dredging;<br />
■ ensuring that dredging does not compromise <strong>the</strong> structural integrity of dykes, utility crossings <strong>and</strong><br />
bridge abutments; <strong>and</strong><br />
■ ensuring that municipal regulations regarding upl<strong>and</strong> disposal <strong>and</strong> return-water routing are met.<br />
A list of relevant guidelines <strong>and</strong> requirements can be found in <strong>the</strong> Appendices as follows:<br />
Map/Appendix<br />
Map 1<br />
Maps 2-6<br />
Appendix 1<br />
Appendix 2<br />
Appendix 3<br />
Appendix 4<br />
Appendix 5<br />
Appendix 6<br />
Appendix 7<br />
Appendix 8<br />
Appendix 9<br />
Appendix 10<br />
Appendix 11<br />
22 Part 3: The Application Process<br />
Title<br />
Agency Jurisdiction(s)<br />
Deep Sea Channel Navigation Maps<br />
Project Review in <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Estuary<br />
Environmental Dredging <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>the</strong> Lower<br />
Fraser<br />
Transfer Pit Operating <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />
Upl<strong>and</strong> Disposal Requirements<br />
Ocean Disposal Contaminants Testing <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />
Hydrographic Survey <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />
Hydraulic Study <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />
Future Habitat Inventory Requirements<br />
Particle Size Analysis <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />
<strong>Dredge</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Advisory Committee Terms of<br />
Reference<br />
Dredging Application Form
Appendices<br />
A
Agency<br />
Jurisdictions<br />
■<br />
Burrard Inlet<br />
Environmental Action Program<br />
■<br />
Fraser River<br />
Estuary <strong>Management</strong> Program<br />
■<br />
Fraser River Port Authority<br />
■<br />
North Fraser Port Authority<br />
24<br />
MILES<br />
1 2 3 4<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6<br />
KILOMETRES<br />
BOWEN<br />
ISLAND<br />
Point<br />
Atkinson<br />
Sturgeon Bank<br />
LIONS BAY<br />
WEST VANCOUVER<br />
Burrard Inlet<br />
Outer Harbour Inner Harbour<br />
Central Harbour<br />
Roberts Bank<br />
English<br />
Bay<br />
Sea Isl<strong>and</strong><br />
Cap i l a n o River<br />
Westham<br />
Isl<strong>and</strong><br />
False C r e e k<br />
VANCOUVER<br />
RICHMOND<br />
Brunswick Point<br />
NORTH<br />
VANCOUVER<br />
CITY<br />
Lulu Isl<strong>and</strong><br />
NORTH VANCOUVER<br />
North Arm<br />
POINT<br />
ROBERTS<br />
Lynn Creek<br />
South Arm<br />
S ey m our River<br />
DELTA<br />
Appendix 11<br />
Deep<br />
Cove<br />
BURNABY<br />
NEW<br />
WESTMINSTER<br />
Annacis<br />
Isl<strong>and</strong><br />
Boundary Bay<br />
CANADA<br />
U.S.A.<br />
Indian Arm<br />
BELCARRA<br />
Brunette River<br />
ANMORE<br />
PORT<br />
MOODY<br />
Fraser River<br />
WHITE ROCK<br />
Semiahmoo Bay<br />
Coquitlam River<br />
SURREY<br />
PORT<br />
COQUITLAM<br />
COQUITLAM<br />
Serpentin e River<br />
Nicomekl River<br />
C ampb e l l River<br />
Pitt River<br />
PITT<br />
MEADOWS<br />
Barnston<br />
Isl<strong>and</strong><br />
Alouette Ri v er<br />
LANGLEY<br />
CITY<br />
Pitt Lake<br />
MAPLE RIDGE<br />
LANGLEY<br />
Kanaka Creek
Deep Sea<br />
Navigation<br />
Channel Maps<br />
(Source: Fraser<br />
River Port Authority)<br />
Maps are provided<br />
for reference only.<br />
For more detailed<br />
information contact<br />
<strong>the</strong> FRPA.<br />
27<br />
Appendices
Deep Sea<br />
Navigation<br />
Channel Maps<br />
(Source: Fraser<br />
River Port Authority)<br />
Maps are provided<br />
for reference only.<br />
For more detailed<br />
information contact<br />
<strong>the</strong> FRPA.<br />
29<br />
Appendices
Deep Sea<br />
Navigation<br />
Channel Maps<br />
(Source: Fraser<br />
River Port Authority)<br />
Maps are provided<br />
for reference only.<br />
For more detailed<br />
information contact<br />
<strong>the</strong> FRPA.<br />
31 Appendices
Deep Sea<br />
Navigation<br />
Channel Maps<br />
(Source: Fraser<br />
River Port Authority)<br />
Maps are provided<br />
for reference only.<br />
For more detailed<br />
information contact<br />
<strong>the</strong> FRPA.<br />
33<br />
Appendices
Deep Sea<br />
Navigation<br />
Channel Maps<br />
(Source: Fraser<br />
River Port Authority)<br />
Maps are provided<br />
for reference only.<br />
For more detailed<br />
information contact<br />
<strong>the</strong> FRPA.<br />
35 Appendices
5 The Coordinated Project<br />
Review process is being<br />
revised <strong>and</strong> this section<br />
will be replaced when <strong>the</strong><br />
process is complete.<br />
Appendix 1<br />
Project Review in <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Estuary 5<br />
(source: <strong>FREMP</strong>)<br />
The Fraser River Estuary Project Review Process<br />
A process for project review in <strong>the</strong> Fraser River estuary has been established under <strong>the</strong> Fraser River<br />
Estuary <strong>Management</strong> Program (<strong>FREMP</strong>). The area covered by <strong>the</strong> Project Review Process is shown on<br />
map C-1<br />
Types of Projects Reviewed<br />
Any project that has <strong>the</strong> potential to affect <strong>the</strong> surrounding environment must be reviewed. Common<br />
examples are:<br />
■ Dredging<br />
■ Moorage facilities<br />
■ Filling for l<strong>and</strong> area <strong>and</strong> breakwaters<br />
■ Log storage<br />
■ Habitat development <strong>and</strong> restoration<br />
■ Shoreline protection works<br />
Project Review Agencies<br />
The <strong>FREMP</strong> Environmental Review Committee (ERC) is responsible for reviewing all projects. This committee<br />
is made up of representatives from:<br />
■ Environment Canada;<br />
■ Department of Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Oceans;<br />
■ BC Ministry of Environment, L<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Parks;<br />
■ Vancouver Port Authority;<br />
■ Coast Guard;<br />
■ North Fraser Port Authority; <strong>and</strong><br />
■ Fraser River Port Authority.<br />
This Committee, with <strong>FREMP</strong> staff support, reviews all project applications, considers all environmental<br />
comments for each application, <strong>and</strong> compiles a coordinated set of recommendations.<br />
Representatives of <strong>the</strong> Lead Agencies generally attend <strong>the</strong> bi-weekly ERC meetings to give <strong>and</strong> receive<br />
clarifications in order to expedite <strong>the</strong> review process. Representatives of municipalities may also periodically<br />
attend <strong>the</strong>se meetings to discuss projects of concern to <strong>the</strong>ir communities.<br />
Nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>FREMP</strong> nor <strong>the</strong> ERC are government agencies, <strong>and</strong> have no legal authority of <strong>the</strong>ir own. All<br />
responses by <strong>the</strong> ERC are founded on <strong>the</strong> authority of one or more of its member organizations.<br />
Lead Agencies have been authorized to control <strong>the</strong> right to occupy or lease l<strong>and</strong> or water lots which are<br />
not privately owned. These Lead Agencies serve as prime contacts with <strong>the</strong> proponent throughout <strong>the</strong><br />
Project Review Process.<br />
37 Appendix 1
Applications for new projects within <strong>the</strong> review area must be made to one of <strong>the</strong> following agencies:<br />
■ Fraser River Port Authority<br />
■ North Fraser Port Authority<br />
■ BC Assets <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Corporation<br />
The Fraser River Port Authority (FRPA) receives applications for any new or exp<strong>and</strong>ed development<br />
projects occurring on l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> water lots within <strong>the</strong> areas shown in <strong>the</strong> black on <strong>the</strong> map.<br />
The North Fraser Port Authority (NFPA) exercises similar authority for areas shown in white on <strong>the</strong> map.<br />
The BC Assets <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong>s Corporation has jurisdiction over all BC Crown l<strong>and</strong>, shown in grey on<br />
<strong>the</strong> map.<br />
The application is referred to <strong>the</strong> ERC for environmental review <strong>and</strong> recommendation(s) prior to <strong>the</strong><br />
Lead Agencies making a decision on an application.<br />
The Project Review Process<br />
The key step for a new project is <strong>the</strong> submission of an application to <strong>the</strong> appropriate Lead Agency.<br />
The fastest way for a proponent to obtain project approval is to ensure full compliance with applicable<br />
guidelines, <strong>and</strong> to submit a fully <strong>and</strong> accurately completed application. An incomplete application will<br />
not be accepted by <strong>the</strong> Lead Agency, resulting in significant delays to <strong>the</strong> project.<br />
A Common Application Form has been developed for Lead Agencies to acquire a st<strong>and</strong>ard set of information<br />
to be examined through <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> Project Review Process. This form contains all <strong>the</strong> basic<br />
information requirements of <strong>the</strong> many agencies reviewing projects in <strong>the</strong> Fraser River estuary.<br />
Before <strong>the</strong> application is submitted to <strong>the</strong> Lead Agency, it can be very useful to discuss a project with<br />
one or more ERC members. These “pre-application” discussions can help determine:<br />
■ if <strong>the</strong> project is in <strong>the</strong> review area;<br />
■ which Lead Agency receives <strong>the</strong> application;<br />
■ if <strong>the</strong> project will likely require detailed environmental studies;<br />
■ what information should be provided to avoid delays;<br />
■ if <strong>the</strong> project concept <strong>and</strong> proposed site are consistent with applicable criteria; <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
Applicants are encouraged to consult <strong>the</strong> available guidelines for development within <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> area.<br />
These include:<br />
■ Area Designations;<br />
■ Habitat Classification;<br />
■ Log Storage <strong>Guidelines</strong>;<br />
■ Dredging <strong>Guidelines</strong>; <strong>and</strong><br />
■ Exclusion List.<br />
Once an application is accepted by <strong>the</strong> Lead Agency, it is forwarded to <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> office.<br />
<strong>FREMP</strong> distributes <strong>the</strong> application to all agencies with regulatory authority over <strong>the</strong> project. They are<br />
requested to provide a response within 30 days. After 30 to 45 days, <strong>the</strong> ERC reviews all environmental<br />
referral comments <strong>and</strong> prepares a coordinated environmental response. This response contains all <strong>the</strong><br />
environmental recommendations from regulatory agencies.<br />
38 Appendix 1
The ERC-coordinated environmental response is <strong>the</strong>n sent to <strong>the</strong> Lead Agency, which considers this<br />
response as well as non-environmental factors (e.g., municipal zoning consideration) relating to <strong>the</strong><br />
application. The Lead Agency <strong>the</strong>n issues a Decision Statement reflecting <strong>FREMP</strong>’s environmental, economical,<br />
<strong>and</strong> social objectives. All comments received during <strong>the</strong> Project Review Process will be passed<br />
on verbatim to <strong>the</strong> applicant.<br />
For approved projects, <strong>the</strong> Decision Statement may be accompanied by a lease, dredging permit, or<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r approval documents.<br />
The applicant is responsible for obtaining any o<strong>the</strong>r required approvals (e.g., ocean dumping or waste<br />
management permits).<br />
To assist Lead Agencies in screening <strong>and</strong> approving certain types of development applications or exclusion,<br />
<strong>the</strong> Lead Agency will give approval without referral t <strong>the</strong> ERC <strong>and</strong> provide <strong>FREMP</strong> with Decision<br />
Statements for <strong>the</strong> public record. The future expansion of <strong>the</strong> exclusion list will help ensure that agencies<br />
can allocate <strong>the</strong>ir resources to reviewing <strong>the</strong> more specific proposals.<br />
Options available to ERC<br />
Using <strong>the</strong> regulatory authority that each participating agency contributes through <strong>the</strong> ERC as a committee,<br />
<strong>the</strong> following options are available:<br />
■ recommend approval of <strong>the</strong> project (specifying environmental recommendations);<br />
■ recommend rejection of <strong>the</strong> project on environmental grounds;<br />
■ ask for more information to help reach a decision;<br />
■ set up a special Task Force to deal with unresolved issues prior to making a recommendation; or<br />
■ determine that ano<strong>the</strong>r formal project review process should be followed (e.g., <strong>the</strong> Province’s Major<br />
Project Review Process or a Federal Environmental Assessment Panel).<br />
The Applicant’s Role<br />
The applicant should determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> project is in <strong>the</strong> review area, <strong>and</strong> what applications are<br />
needed. The Lead Agency <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> office can provide advice. Pre-application discussion with <strong>the</strong><br />
Lead Agency <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> ERC can help <strong>the</strong> applicant determine what issues may be encountered.<br />
Once <strong>the</strong> application has been submitted to <strong>the</strong> Lead Agency, <strong>the</strong> applicant may be contacted for clarification<br />
by one or more of <strong>the</strong> reviewing agencies. The ERC will make every effort to complete its<br />
coordinated environmental response in 30 to 45 days. Applicants should plan on this time period as a<br />
minimum for <strong>the</strong> ERC’s response.<br />
As well, <strong>the</strong> applicant should allow for additional time for <strong>the</strong> Lead Agency to consider <strong>the</strong> ERC’s recommendations<br />
<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r comments in reaching a final decision (environmental as well as economical <strong>and</strong><br />
social factors are considered in <strong>the</strong> decision making process). In 1991, for example, an average period<br />
of 80 days was required from <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> application was signed to <strong>the</strong> Lead Agency Decision<br />
Statement.<br />
The applicant may be asked to provide additional information, or conduct a specific study in support of<br />
<strong>the</strong> project.<br />
The applicant may request a copy or <strong>the</strong> ERC-coordinated environmental response as soon as it is<br />
finalized.<br />
The project recommended for approval should be started <strong>and</strong> be substantially underway within one<br />
year of <strong>the</strong> date of approval by <strong>the</strong> Lead Agency. O<strong>the</strong>rwise, a new application would be required.<br />
Under no circumstances should <strong>the</strong> applicant begin work on <strong>the</strong> project until al approvals from <strong>the</strong><br />
Lead Agency are confirmed in writing. Verbal or interim indications that a project may be acceptable<br />
should not be construed as approval to proceed with <strong>the</strong> project.<br />
39 Appendix 1
Public Access to Information<br />
Information about a project is available to <strong>the</strong> public at <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> office. The office keeps a quick<br />
Referral Log that contains a list of all projects under review to help interested parties stay informed.<br />
Opportunities for Public Input<br />
Public input at any time is welcomed by <strong>FREMP</strong>. <strong>FREMP</strong> will ensure that public input or requested information<br />
is directed to <strong>the</strong> most appropriate source for response.<br />
The public can provide written comments to <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> office. As long as <strong>the</strong>se comments are submitted<br />
during <strong>the</strong> ERC response period, all relevant environmental input from <strong>the</strong> public will be factored<br />
into coordinated environmental response. The public may also submit written requests for a meeting<br />
with <strong>the</strong> ERC to discuss environmental issues arising from a particular project. Non-environmental<br />
issues may also be brought to <strong>the</strong> attention of <strong>the</strong> Lead Agency for consideration.<br />
It is <strong>the</strong> responsibility of concerned members of <strong>the</strong> public to keep abreast of events as <strong>the</strong>y unfold<br />
during <strong>the</strong> review process to ensue that <strong>the</strong>ir views are heard. The <strong>FREMP</strong> office is available to provide<br />
assistance <strong>and</strong> advice.<br />
Questioning <strong>the</strong> Final Decision<br />
Anyone disagreeing with <strong>the</strong> environmental recommendations provided by <strong>the</strong> ERC can request a<br />
review of those recommendations. This is also <strong>the</strong> case for <strong>the</strong> Lead Agency Decision Statement.<br />
The request must be submitted to <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> office, listing <strong>the</strong> reasons for disagreement. The office<br />
will notify <strong>the</strong> person(s) making <strong>the</strong> request as promptly as possible as to whe<strong>the</strong>r a review of <strong>the</strong> recommendations<br />
will proceed, <strong>and</strong> if so, in what manner it will be carried out.<br />
40 Appendix 1
Appendix 2<br />
6 The “lower Fraser River<br />
Estuary” is defined as <strong>the</strong><br />
section of <strong>the</strong> Fraser River<br />
from <strong>the</strong> Oak Street Bridge<br />
<strong>and</strong> George Massey Tunnel<br />
downstream to Roberts<br />
<strong>and</strong> Sturgeon Banks<br />
(exclusive).<br />
Appendix 2<br />
Environmental Dredging <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>the</strong> Lower Fraser<br />
(source: <strong>FREMP</strong>)<br />
1 From March 1 to March 15, <strong>the</strong>re shall be no suction dredging in water which is less than five (5)<br />
metres deep at daily low water in order to protect juvenile salmonids.<br />
2 From March 15 to June 15, <strong>the</strong>re shall be no dredging (clamshell or suction) of dredge material volumes<br />
greater than 4000 m3 in order to protect eulachon.<br />
3 From June 15 to July 15, in <strong>the</strong> lower Fraser River Estuary 6<br />
, <strong>the</strong>re shall be no suction dredging in<br />
water which is less than five (5) metres deep at daily low water in order to protect juvenile<br />
salmonids.<br />
4 Pumps for suction dredging shall not operate when <strong>the</strong> suction-head is within one <strong>and</strong> one half<br />
metres (1.5 m) of <strong>the</strong> bottom.<br />
5 If <strong>the</strong> dredge material is intended for ocean or in-river disposal, <strong>the</strong> dredge spoil must comply with<br />
Environment Canada’s Ocean Disposal Regulations <strong>and</strong> Interim Contaminant Testing <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />
found in Appendix 5 of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>Guidelines</strong>. If upl<strong>and</strong> disposal is planned, <strong>the</strong> dredge material must<br />
comply with <strong>the</strong> provincial Ministry of Environment, L<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Parks’ Contaminated Sites<br />
Regulation under <strong>the</strong> Waste <strong>Management</strong> Act. These are found in Appendix 3 of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>Guidelines</strong>.<br />
6 The works shall be conducted utilizing water-based machinery or equipment (e.g. boat, barge, etc.)<br />
which shall be firmly moored in deep water, far enough offshore to prevent any grounding onto <strong>the</strong><br />
intertidal foreshore or riverbed of <strong>the</strong> Fraser River. The only exception is <strong>the</strong> use of vertical spuds or<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r anchors to keep <strong>the</strong> machinery or equipment firmly moored in place.<br />
7 All works <strong>and</strong> activities riverward of higher high water, including works on <strong>the</strong> foreshore conducted<br />
in <strong>the</strong> dry during periods of low water, works in, over or adjacent to <strong>the</strong> water or works discharging<br />
to <strong>the</strong> water shall be conducted in a manner that prevents or minimizes <strong>the</strong> direct or indirect release<br />
of sediment or sediment-laden water into <strong>the</strong> aquatic environment. In this regard, <strong>the</strong> works should<br />
address <strong>the</strong> applicable water quality criteria as described in <strong>the</strong> British Columbia Water Quality<br />
<strong>Guidelines</strong> (Criteria): 1998 Edition produced by BC Ministry of Environment, L<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Parks (<strong>the</strong><br />
“water quality criteria). For particulate matter, <strong>the</strong> water quality criteria includes <strong>the</strong> following specific<br />
criteria:<br />
i When background is less than or equal to 50 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU), induced turbidity<br />
should not exceed 5 NTU above <strong>the</strong> background value.<br />
ii When background is greater than 50 NTU, induced turbidity should not exceed <strong>the</strong> background<br />
value by more than 10 % of <strong>the</strong> background value.<br />
iii When background is less than or equal to 100 milligrams per litre (mg/L), induced non-filterable<br />
residue (NFR) should not exceed 10 mg/L above <strong>the</strong> background value.<br />
iv When background is greater than 100 mg/L, induced NFR should not exceed <strong>the</strong> background<br />
value by more than 10 % of <strong>the</strong> background value.<br />
For <strong>the</strong> purposes of <strong>the</strong>se guidelines, background is defined as <strong>the</strong> level at an appropriate adjacent<br />
reference site that is affected nei<strong>the</strong>r by works at <strong>the</strong> site, nor sediment-laden or turbid waters<br />
resulting from works at <strong>the</strong> site.<br />
Should <strong>the</strong> works result in NTU or NFR levels in excess of <strong>the</strong> criteria outlined above, <strong>the</strong>n those<br />
works <strong>and</strong> activities that might be contributing to <strong>the</strong> turbidity shall be halted until measures are<br />
put in place to ensure compliance.<br />
41 Appendix 2
8 All works must be undertaken <strong>and</strong> completed in such a manner so as to prevent <strong>the</strong> release of substances<br />
deleterious to fish <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r aquatic life onto <strong>the</strong> upl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>/or intertidal foreshore of or<br />
into any watercourse or water body. The proponent is hereby reminded of its obligation to comply at<br />
all times with Section 36 of <strong>the</strong> Fisheries Act, which specifically prohibits <strong>the</strong> deposit of deleterious<br />
substances into fish bearing waters. Due diligence is required at all times to prevent such deposits,<br />
<strong>and</strong> adherence to <strong>the</strong> terms <strong>and</strong> conditions of this letter does not of itself relieve <strong>the</strong> proponent of<br />
this ongoing obligation.<br />
9 The proponent shall ensure that appropriate spill prevention, containment, <strong>and</strong> clean up contingency<br />
plans for hydrocarbon products (e.g. fuel, oil, hydraulic fluid, etc.), <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r deleterious<br />
substances are in place prior to work commencing <strong>and</strong> that appropriate spill containment <strong>and</strong><br />
cleanup supplies are kept available onsite whenever works are occurring. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, all personnel conducting<br />
<strong>the</strong> works should be familiar with implementing <strong>the</strong> spill clean up plan <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> deployment<br />
of spill response materials.<br />
10 Works shall be carried out in such a manner so as to prevent any adverse impact to fish or fish habitat.<br />
If <strong>the</strong> proposed works result in any such impact <strong>the</strong> Department of Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Oceans<br />
reserves <strong>the</strong> right to immediately suspend or alter operations <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> proponent shall undertake, at<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir own expense, any compensatory <strong>and</strong>/or remedial works deemed necessary by Fisheries <strong>and</strong><br />
Oceans Canada to ensure a no net loss of productive fish capacity.<br />
11 The appropriate Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Oceans Canada Field Supervisor shall be contacted <strong>and</strong> advised at<br />
least five (5) days in advance of <strong>the</strong> start of <strong>the</strong> proposed works as follows:<br />
For works located<br />
Downstream of Alex Fraser Bridge (Delta/Richmond)<br />
<strong>and</strong> Queensborough Bridge (New Westminster)<br />
Downstream of CPR Rail Bridge (Mission)<br />
<strong>and</strong> upstream of Alex Fraser Bridge <strong>and</strong><br />
Queensborough Bridge<br />
Contact<br />
Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Oceans Canada<br />
Field Supervisor In Steveston<br />
604 664 9250 tel<br />
Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Oceans Canada<br />
Field Supervisor Fraser Valley West (Langley)<br />
604 607 4150 tel<br />
12 It should be made clear to dredging applicants that non-compliance with <strong>the</strong> above guidelines could<br />
harm fish <strong>and</strong>/or fish habitat <strong>and</strong> accordingly, may be <strong>the</strong> subject of an investigation under <strong>the</strong><br />
Fisheries Act.<br />
13 Final determination of <strong>the</strong> applicability of <strong>the</strong> above guidelines is at <strong>the</strong> discretion of <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong><br />
Environmental Review Committee.<br />
42 Appendix 2
Appendix 3<br />
Appendix 3<br />
Fraser River Port Authority Transfer Pit Operating <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />
(Source: Fraser River Port Authority)<br />
1 All transfer pits will be backfilled to nominal riverbed grades as determined by <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Port<br />
Authority.<br />
2 Backfill material will be only s<strong>and</strong> supplied from deep sea channel maintenance dredging projects<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or approved borrow/transfer dredging sites. S<strong>and</strong> quality must meet <strong>the</strong> Ocean Dumping<br />
requirements (see Appendix 5).<br />
3 Backfill schedule of transfer pits will be within a 30 day period as per Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Oceans Canada<br />
<strong>Guidelines</strong> or as determined by <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Port Authority unless sufficient reason can be presented<br />
to <strong>the</strong> Port Authority <strong>and</strong> Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Oceans Canada to alter <strong>the</strong> specified period.<br />
4 No transfer pit applications will be activated during high river flows (freshet conditions) above 4000<br />
cms Hope discharge.<br />
5 Transfer pit dredging will be subject to <strong>FREMP</strong> Environmental Dredging <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>the</strong> Lower<br />
Fraser found in Appendix 2 of this document.<br />
6 Methods of positioning <strong>and</strong> control of <strong>the</strong> backfill program must be submitted <strong>and</strong> approved by <strong>the</strong><br />
Fraser River Port Authority.<br />
7 Confirmation of backfill source <strong>and</strong> quantity must be provided to <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Port Authority<br />
before approval is granted.<br />
8 Applicants must provide to <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Port Authority, upon completion of <strong>the</strong> transfer pit backfill<br />
operation, an approved source bathymetric survey plan of <strong>the</strong> transfer pit area. The survey must<br />
be completed according to <strong>the</strong> Hydrographic Survey <strong>Guidelines</strong> in Appendix 6. The plan must be<br />
submitted to <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Port Authority within 30 days of completion of backfill operation.<br />
9 Transfer pits that are proposed in critical or sensitive areas of <strong>the</strong> river as determined by <strong>the</strong> Port<br />
Authority will be subject to an independent river hydraulic study (see Appendix 7) by a recognized<br />
hydraulic engineering firm. A list of recognized firms in <strong>the</strong> Lower Mainl<strong>and</strong> is available From <strong>the</strong><br />
Port Authority.<br />
10 In <strong>the</strong> event <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Port Authority is concerned that an applicant may fail to return <strong>the</strong><br />
transfer pit to its original condition or may use questionable backfill, a performance bond may be<br />
required.<br />
11 On completion of backfilling, <strong>the</strong> applicant will advise <strong>the</strong> Fraser River Port Authority. On receipt of<br />
notification <strong>the</strong> Authority will <strong>the</strong>n advise interested agencies who will have 90 days to provide<br />
comments regarding <strong>the</strong> final condition of <strong>the</strong> site.<br />
43 Appendix 3
44 Appendix 3
Appendix 4<br />
Upl<strong>and</strong> Disposal Requirements<br />
(Source: Ministry of Environment, L<strong>and</strong>s & Parks)<br />
A map is required that clearly indicates <strong>the</strong> area to be dredged <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> accompanying text must note<br />
<strong>the</strong> amount of material to be removed, <strong>the</strong> method of removal, <strong>and</strong> potential sources of contamination<br />
in <strong>the</strong> vicinity of <strong>the</strong> work.<br />
The number of samples required to characterize quantities of materials to be excavated is based on<br />
recommendations in <strong>the</strong> Environment Canada document Interim Contaminant Testing <strong>Guidelines</strong> for<br />
Ocean Disposal Pacific <strong>and</strong> Yukon Region dated March 2000 (see Appendix 5) as follows:<br />
Quantity (m 3 )<br />
0 – 5000<br />
5000 – 20000<br />
20000 – 100000<br />
Number of Samples Required<br />
This intensity of sampling is intended to “screen” for contaminants <strong>and</strong> more intensive sampling may<br />
be required should significant contamination be suspected or encountered. It should also be noted<br />
that <strong>the</strong> samples obtained are expected to be surface s<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> representative for <strong>the</strong> area to be<br />
dredged (i.e. sampling locations spaced across <strong>the</strong> dredge area). Should contamination at depth within<br />
<strong>the</strong> s<strong>and</strong>s be suspected <strong>the</strong>n s<strong>and</strong> core samples may be required.<br />
Analytical tests performed on <strong>the</strong> s<strong>and</strong> samples should be done at <strong>the</strong> proponent’s laboratory of choice<br />
<strong>and</strong> at cost borne by <strong>the</strong> proponent. The results of <strong>the</strong>se tests must be summarized in a Contaminant<br />
Testing Report <strong>and</strong> submitted to MELP. Tests should be chosen to reflect potential contamination from<br />
local sources. For screening purposes it is suggested that a metals package test (analyzes for about 20<br />
metals) <strong>and</strong> a hydrocarbon test (PAHs are fine but <strong>the</strong> TEH test - total extractable hydrocarbons - would<br />
likely be more cost effective) be done. O<strong>the</strong>r tests, such as for antisapstain chemicals as may be used<br />
at sawmills, may be required depending on sources of contamination in <strong>the</strong> vicinity of <strong>the</strong> area to be<br />
dredged.<br />
The question typically being asked is whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> material being dredged is suitable for disposal onto<br />
l<strong>and</strong>. The indicated s<strong>and</strong> quality is evaluated against <strong>the</strong> Contaminated Sites Regulations. By <strong>the</strong>se values<br />
it is determined whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> material is suitable as l<strong>and</strong>fill <strong>and</strong>/or is consistent with municipal<br />
zoning <strong>and</strong> Official Community Plan designations.<br />
Proponents should refer to <strong>the</strong> Contaminated Sites Regulation (CSR) Technical Guidance documents<br />
titled Site Characterization <strong>and</strong> Confirmatory Testing <strong>and</strong> Statistical Criteria for Characterizing a Volume<br />
of Contaminated Material. Fur<strong>the</strong>r proponents seeking to deposit sediments to <strong>the</strong> upl<strong>and</strong>s need to be<br />
aware of <strong>the</strong> CSR st<strong>and</strong>ards in Schedules 4, 5, <strong>and</strong> 6 of <strong>the</strong> CSR <strong>and</strong> must obtain a Soil Relocation<br />
Agreement if <strong>the</strong> sediments are to be moved off site <strong>and</strong> exceed limits in Schedule 7 of <strong>the</strong> CSR.<br />
45 Appendix 4<br />
3<br />
6<br />
8
46 Appendix 4
Appendix 5<br />
Interim Contaminant Testing <strong>Guidelines</strong> For Ocean Disposal<br />
Pacific <strong>and</strong> Yukon Region<br />
(Source: Environment Canada, March 2000)<br />
In response to growing concern over <strong>the</strong> biological implications of contaminants in marine sediments<br />
along <strong>the</strong> Canadian coastline, Environment Canada (EC), Pacific <strong>and</strong> Yukon Region, in consultation with<br />
<strong>the</strong> Regional Ocean Disposal Advisory Committee, has developed <strong>the</strong> following guidelines for sampling,<br />
analysis <strong>and</strong> reporting associated with proposed ocean disposal activities.<br />
Under Schedule 6 (Assessment of Waste or O<strong>the</strong>r Matter) of <strong>the</strong> Canadian Environmental Protection<br />
Act (CEPA), EC <strong>and</strong> permit applicants must consider <strong>the</strong> availability of practical alternate disposal<br />
options. To satisfy this requirement <strong>the</strong> applicant must provide a written record of <strong>the</strong> decision-making<br />
process used in selecting ocean disposal as <strong>the</strong> alternative of choice for disposal of materials. Disposal<br />
at sea is only permitted for materials where it is <strong>the</strong> environmentally preferable <strong>and</strong> practical alternative.<br />
To assess <strong>the</strong> potential for environmental impacts of ocean disposal, EC requires chemical analyses to<br />
be performed on any material where <strong>the</strong>re is a lack of chemical data, or a reason to believe that contaminants<br />
such as selected trace metals or organics are present. Guidance for <strong>the</strong> number of samples<br />
required may be obtained through Environment Canada’s Regional Ocean Disposal Offices. A proposed<br />
sampling program should be developed by <strong>the</strong> applicant, based on information provided in <strong>the</strong> following<br />
tables, <strong>and</strong> submitted to <strong>the</strong> appropriate Regional Office for approval prior to commencement of<br />
loading or ocean disposal activities.<br />
Materials found to contain substances of concern at, or higher than, <strong>the</strong> regulated or guideline concentrations<br />
identified in <strong>the</strong> following tables may be considered for ocean disposal under CEPA Schedule 6.<br />
A substance may be considered for ocean disposal if tests show that it can be disposed at sea so as<br />
not to cause acute or chronic effects on marine organisms or human health, whe<strong>the</strong>r or not arising<br />
from <strong>the</strong>ir bioaccumulation in marine organisms. A tiered assessment approach using biological testing<br />
is used for this determination. Ocean disposal options such as capping, containment, <strong>and</strong><br />
side-casting will be considered by EC, but <strong>the</strong>ir acceptance will be conditional on compliance with<br />
Schedule 6.<br />
Sampling <strong>and</strong> Analysis Requirements<br />
The following pages identify <strong>the</strong> minimum sampling <strong>and</strong> analytical requirements for dredged <strong>and</strong> excavated<br />
materials based on <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> project, as well as rejection/screening limits currently used by<br />
EC. Sampling requirements will be tailored on a site specific basis at <strong>the</strong> discretion of EC, <strong>and</strong> analysis<br />
of o<strong>the</strong>r parameters may be requested when EC has reason to believe that o<strong>the</strong>r contaminants are<br />
present.<br />
Minimum Requirements for <strong>Dredge</strong>d Material<br />
Sampling Requirements<br />
The following are <strong>the</strong> minimum sampling requirements for disposal of dredged material. Additional<br />
guidance may be obtained from <strong>the</strong> Users’ Guide to <strong>the</strong> Application Form for Ocean Disposal (Report<br />
EPS 1/MA/1, 1995) available from Regional Ocean Disposal Offices. Projects involving disposal of less<br />
than 4 000 cubic metres of material resulting from maintenance dredging are eligible for disposal<br />
under a valid general permit (Pacific <strong>and</strong> Yukon Region).<br />
Paren<strong>the</strong>ses indicate <strong>the</strong> number of composite samples to be analysed initially for dioxins/furans, if<br />
requested by EC.<br />
47 Appendix 5
Table 1 Minimum sampling requirements for dredged material<br />
Project Quantity<br />
Permit Type<br />
# of Samples<br />
0 - 4 000 m 3<br />
0 - 10 000 m 3<br />
10 001 - 30 000 m 3<br />
10 001 - 30 000 m 3<br />
30 001 - 60 000 m 3<br />
≥ 60 000 m 3<br />
Should <strong>the</strong> site history reveal cause for environmental concern, an increased number of samples<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or analysis of additional metals <strong>and</strong>/or organics may be requested.<br />
Analysis Requirements<br />
Details of minimum analytical requirements may be obtained through Environment Canada’s Regional<br />
Ocean Disposal Offices.<br />
Table 2 Minimum analysis requirements for dredged material.<br />
Trace Metals<br />
Organics<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
General<br />
Site-Specific<br />
Site-Specific<br />
Site-Specific<br />
Site-Specific<br />
Site-Specific<br />
Parameter<br />
Mercury<br />
Cadmium<br />
PAH<br />
For Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH), <strong>the</strong> analytical methodology <strong>and</strong> quality assurance protocol<br />
must conform to that outlined in <strong>the</strong> Interim Quality Assurance <strong>Guidelines</strong> for Determination of<br />
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Marine Sediments for Ocean Disposal, a copy of which is available<br />
from EC.<br />
For dioxin/furan, <strong>the</strong> analytical methodology <strong>and</strong> quality assurance protocol must conform to that outlined<br />
in <strong>the</strong> Internal Quality Assurance Requirements for Analysis of Dioxins in Environmental Samples,<br />
a copy of which is available from EC.<br />
The analysis results are to be reported on a dry weight basis with detection limits less than or equal to<br />
those stated above. The precision of <strong>the</strong> test method should be indicated by reporting analyses on five<br />
replicate sub-samples on 10% of <strong>the</strong> trace metal samples, <strong>and</strong> two replicate sub-samples on 20% of<br />
<strong>the</strong> organics samples, with a minimum of one replicated sample. Sub-sampling should be done following<br />
homogenizing but prior to digestion of <strong>the</strong> sample <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> replicates should not be run<br />
consecutively. The accuracy of <strong>the</strong> test method should be indicated by reporting <strong>the</strong> results of certified<br />
reference materials analysed at <strong>the</strong> same time as <strong>the</strong> test samples.<br />
48 Appendix 5<br />
3 (1)<br />
6 (1)<br />
5 (1)<br />
4 (1)<br />
OR<br />
9 (2)<br />
5 (2)<br />
5 (2)<br />
Total Organic CarbonParticle Size<br />
-<br />
Limit of Detection<br />
0.2 µg/g<br />
0.2 µg/g<br />
0.1 µg/g<br />
Type of Sampling<br />
Surface sampling prior to<br />
loading.<br />
Surface sampling prior to<br />
loading.<br />
Surface sampling prior to<br />
loading.<br />
Sampling to depth prior<br />
to loading.<br />
Surface sampling prior to<br />
loading.<br />
Surface sampling prior to<br />
loading.<br />
Sampling to depth prior<br />
to loading.<br />
Sampling requirements<br />
will be determined on a<br />
project specific basis.
Minimum Requirements for Excavation Material<br />
Sampling Requirements<br />
The following are <strong>the</strong> minimum sampling requirements for disposal of excavated material. Additional<br />
guidance may be obtained from <strong>the</strong> Users Guide to <strong>the</strong> Application Form for Ocean Disposal (Report<br />
EPS 1/MA/1, 1995), which is available through Environment Canada’s Regional Ocean Disposal Offices.<br />
Projects involving ocean disposal of undisturbed, native till material may be completed under a valid<br />
general excavation permit (Pacific <strong>and</strong> Yukon Region). For o<strong>the</strong>r excavated materials, a site specific permit<br />
will be required.<br />
Table 3 Minimum sampling requirements for excavated material.<br />
Project Quantity<br />
0 - 10 000 m 3<br />
10 001 - 30 000 m 3<br />
30 001 - 60 000 m 3<br />
≥ 60 000 m 3<br />
Should <strong>the</strong> site history reveal cause for environmental concern, an increased number of samples<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or analysis of additional metals <strong>and</strong>/or organics may be requested.<br />
Analysis Requirements<br />
Details of minimum analytical requirements may be obtained through Environment Canada’s Regional<br />
Ocean Disposal Offices.<br />
Table 4 Minimum analysis requirements for excavated material.<br />
Trace Metals<br />
Organics<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
# of Samples<br />
6<br />
9<br />
12<br />
-<br />
Parameter<br />
Mercury<br />
Cadmium<br />
PAH<br />
Total Organic Carbon Particle Size<br />
Type of Sampling<br />
Composite of surface native till to 1<br />
metre depth.<br />
Composite of surface native till to 1<br />
metre depth.<br />
Composite of surface native till to 1<br />
metre depth.<br />
Number of samples to be determined<br />
on a project specific basis.<br />
Limit of Detection<br />
0.2 µg/g<br />
0.2 µg/g<br />
0.1 µg/g<br />
For PAH, <strong>the</strong> analytical methodology <strong>and</strong> quality assurance protocol must conform to that outlined in<br />
<strong>the</strong> ‘Interim Quality Assurance <strong>Guidelines</strong> for Determination of Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons in<br />
Marine Sediments for Ocean Disposal’, a copy of which is available from EC.<br />
For dioxin/furan, <strong>the</strong> analytical methodology <strong>and</strong> quality assurance protocol must conform to that outlined<br />
in <strong>the</strong> ‘Internal Quality Assurance Requirements for Analysis of Dioxins in Environmental<br />
Samples’, a copy of which is available from EC.<br />
The analysis results are to be reported on a dry weight basis with detection limits less than or equal to<br />
those stated above. The precision of <strong>the</strong> test method should be indicated by reporting sub-samples on<br />
20% of <strong>the</strong> organics samples, with a minimum of one replicated sample. Sub-sampling should be done<br />
following homogenizing but prior to digestion of <strong>the</strong> sample <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> replicates should not be run consecutively.<br />
The accuracy of <strong>the</strong> test method should be indicated by reporting <strong>the</strong> results of certified<br />
reference materials analysed at <strong>the</strong> same time as <strong>the</strong> test samples.<br />
49 Appendix 5
Rejection/Screening Limits<br />
Material found to exceed <strong>the</strong> following regulated <strong>and</strong> guideline limits will not be considered for ocean<br />
disposal unless tests show it can be disposed at sea within <strong>the</strong> criteria established under Schedule 6,<br />
Canadian Environment Protection Act.<br />
Environment Canada may impose more stringent limits if <strong>the</strong> site history indicates cause for environmental<br />
concern.<br />
Table 5 Rejection/screening limits for ocean disposal<br />
Parameter<br />
Cadmium<br />
Mercury<br />
Chlorophenols (PCP) (penta <strong>and</strong> tetra isomers)<br />
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB)<br />
Total PAH<br />
Dioxin/Furan<br />
Rejection/Screening Limit<br />
0.6 mg/g dry weight<br />
0.75 mg/g dry weight<br />
1.0 mg/g dry weight<br />
0.1 mg/g dry weight<br />
2.5 mg/g dry weight<br />
“Quantifiable” 2,3,7,8 TCDD<br />
Steps Required for Collecting Samples <strong>and</strong> Submitting Analytical Data<br />
The applicant is required to prepare <strong>the</strong> following information to be included with <strong>the</strong> proposed sampling<br />
program:<br />
1 A location map for <strong>the</strong> dredge/excavation site with <strong>the</strong> street address of <strong>the</strong> proposed excavation or<br />
dredge site;<br />
2 A site map showing <strong>the</strong> proposed excavation or dredge site relative to known l<strong>and</strong>marks <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
streets;<br />
3 A list of any known possible contaminant input sources in <strong>the</strong> vicinity of <strong>the</strong> proposed works;<br />
4 A written record of <strong>the</strong> decision making process used in selecting ocean disposal as <strong>the</strong> preferred<br />
materials disposal option, explaining why o<strong>the</strong>r disposal methods are not being used;<br />
5 A site use history for <strong>the</strong> site from which <strong>the</strong> material destined for ocean disposal will originate; <strong>and</strong><br />
6 A proposed sampling plan of <strong>the</strong> site showing <strong>the</strong> proposed sampling locations, <strong>and</strong> a list of proposed<br />
analyses. The proposed sampling plan should be developed based on information presented<br />
in this document <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Users Guide to <strong>the</strong> Application Form for Ocean Disposal. Assistance in<br />
designing a sampling program can be provided by Environment Canada. The sampling program<br />
must be approved prior to taking <strong>the</strong> samples.<br />
The information identified above should be sent to EC. If <strong>the</strong> project does not qualify for completion<br />
under <strong>the</strong> terms <strong>and</strong> conditions of a general permit, this information should be submitted with a completed<br />
ocean disposal application. For information on how to apply, please contact EC.<br />
If <strong>the</strong> project qualifies for completion under a general ocean disposal permit, this information must be<br />
submitted to EC with a covering letter describing <strong>the</strong> proposed activities in detail, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed<br />
schedule for <strong>the</strong> work. Upon completion of <strong>the</strong> sampling <strong>and</strong> analyses program, <strong>the</strong> test data, toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />
with all QA/QC data as identified in <strong>the</strong> foregoing information, must be sent to EC.<br />
No work may proceed under a general permit until written approval for <strong>the</strong> specific site has been<br />
received from EC, <strong>and</strong> a copy of <strong>the</strong> approval letter is posted at <strong>the</strong> work site.<br />
For fur<strong>the</strong>r information on this document, or any o<strong>the</strong>r matter relating to <strong>the</strong> Ocean Disposal Program,<br />
please contact Environment Canada.<br />
50 Appendix 5
General Guide to Soil <strong>and</strong> Sediment Sample Collection<br />
Containers for <strong>the</strong> samples should be obtained from <strong>the</strong> laboratory contracted to conduct <strong>the</strong> required<br />
analyses. Avoid unnecessary contact with clean glassware <strong>and</strong> utensils. A clean stainless steel or teflon<br />
spoon or scoop is ideal for transferring samples. H<strong>and</strong>le containers by <strong>the</strong> outsides only. Do not touch<br />
<strong>the</strong> inside of <strong>the</strong> jar, or teflon (or foil) liners, <strong>and</strong> use spoons or scoops by <strong>the</strong> h<strong>and</strong>les only. When<br />
removing a foil or teflon liner <strong>and</strong> lid from a jar, remove as one piece <strong>and</strong> put down on a piece of foil or<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r clean surface while filling <strong>the</strong> jar.<br />
If using a grab sampler, remove <strong>the</strong> water from <strong>the</strong> surface of <strong>the</strong> grab, taking care not to disturb <strong>the</strong><br />
contents if possible. Use <strong>the</strong> clean scoop to remove a portion of <strong>the</strong> sediment from <strong>the</strong> middle of <strong>the</strong><br />
sampler down to <strong>the</strong> depth of <strong>the</strong> material caught in <strong>the</strong> grab. The material in <strong>the</strong> sample jar should be<br />
representative of <strong>the</strong> material to be loaded for ocean disposal.<br />
Alternatively, <strong>the</strong> sample may be taken by removing <strong>the</strong> lid, holding <strong>the</strong> jar by <strong>the</strong> sides <strong>and</strong> scooping<br />
<strong>the</strong> sample from <strong>the</strong> sediment without <strong>the</strong> use of o<strong>the</strong>r utensils. The threads of <strong>the</strong> jar may <strong>the</strong>n be<br />
wiped with a paper towel before replacing <strong>the</strong> lid. Do not fill <strong>the</strong> jar more than about 3/4 full, allowing<br />
plenty of room for mixing/stirring, <strong>and</strong> expansion during freezing. When <strong>the</strong> sample is in <strong>the</strong> jar,<br />
replace <strong>the</strong> teflon/foil liner <strong>and</strong> lid, <strong>and</strong> label <strong>the</strong> jar with project identification, sampling site number<br />
<strong>and</strong> sampling date.<br />
To clean <strong>the</strong> sampling spoon or grab in between samples, wipe with a paper towel to remove any<br />
solids, <strong>the</strong>n rinse with water. Clean <strong>the</strong> tray in this manner as required.<br />
If three samples are required for analysis, three small jars of sediment should be taken for each sampling<br />
station, for a total of nine jars. The three jars per sample will be composited by <strong>the</strong> analytical lab<br />
by taking equal aliquots of sample from each jar for a single analysis of most parameters of concern.<br />
The samples may be fur<strong>the</strong>r composited for o<strong>the</strong>r testing as required but would o<strong>the</strong>rwise be maintained<br />
as discrete samples.<br />
Keep <strong>the</strong> samples in a refrigerator or on ice for short term storage (1-2 days); freeze <strong>the</strong> sample as soon<br />
as possible or store over dry ice for long term storage. The laboratory responsible for <strong>the</strong> analyses<br />
should be asked to freeze <strong>the</strong> samples after removal of sufficient material to complete <strong>the</strong> required<br />
analyses. These samples should remain frozen until <strong>the</strong> permit, or approval under a general permit,<br />
has been issued by EC.<br />
51 Appendix 5
52 Appendix 5
7 Horizontal positioning<br />
can be referenced to a<br />
local grid or identified control<br />
points if UTM grid is<br />
not practical or available.<br />
Appendix 6<br />
Fraser River Hydrographic Survey <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />
(Source: Fraser River Port Authority)<br />
Accuracy<br />
Horizontal 7<br />
: ± 3 metres NAD83 grid; Vertical: ± 0.1 metre / 10 cm to LLWL<br />
Coverage<br />
Density of Soundings Minimum 50 metre cross line spacing with soundings every 20 metres<br />
Longitudinal Check Lines Minimum of two longitudinal check lines at a suitable spacing should be run<br />
through <strong>the</strong> length of <strong>the</strong> area to confirm <strong>the</strong> accuracy of <strong>the</strong> cross lines. These lines should extend at<br />
least one third of <strong>the</strong> length of <strong>the</strong> area beyond <strong>the</strong> upstream <strong>and</strong> downstream boundaries of <strong>the</strong> area<br />
to track potential migration.<br />
Survey coverage should always address <strong>the</strong> potential impact of side slope stability from <strong>the</strong> dredge cut<br />
to structures <strong>and</strong> environmental concerns.<br />
Calibration of Equipment<br />
All positioning equipment shall be field calibrated so that <strong>the</strong> deviation of <strong>the</strong> calibrated value shall not<br />
exceed <strong>the</strong> least count of <strong>the</strong> equipment system.<br />
Echo sounder calibration Prior to <strong>the</strong> commencement of a survey project, <strong>the</strong> echo sounder <strong>and</strong> transducer<br />
shall be calibrated for draft <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> system bar-checked. The bar-check should be performed in<br />
<strong>the</strong> vicinity of <strong>the</strong> intended survey <strong>and</strong> repeated as required. Velocimeters can be substituted for barchecks<br />
with requirements as per bar-check guidelines.<br />
Data Presentation<br />
When possible, <strong>the</strong> chart scale shall be 1:2000 using PWGSC base plan format. Soundings are in<br />
metres relative to LLWL with negative values representing elevations above Low Water Datum. The<br />
Local Low Water Datum used to reduce <strong>the</strong> sounding data is to be noted on <strong>the</strong> drawing. The horizontal<br />
datum (e.g. NAD83, local grid or selected reference points) as well as projection used (UTM) will also<br />
need to be noted on <strong>the</strong> drawing. O<strong>the</strong>r information required would be project title, date of survey, survey<br />
personnel, site location, water level reference points <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r pertinent information.<br />
53 Appendix 6
54 Appendix 6
Appendix 7<br />
Appendix 7<br />
Source: PWGSC<br />
Fraser River Hydraulic Study Requirements<br />
This section outlines requirements for conducting hydraulic studies for <strong>the</strong> purposes of assessing<br />
Dredging Applications. These Terms of Reference are intended to establish consistent modelling<br />
methodologies <strong>and</strong> practices when using hydraulic models to assess impacts of dredging proposals.<br />
This should assist with expediting <strong>the</strong> review process of <strong>the</strong> study <strong>and</strong> assessment of <strong>the</strong> dredging<br />
license application.<br />
It is suggested that proponents or <strong>the</strong>ir consultants call Public Works & Government Services Canada<br />
(PWGSC) before initiating hydraulic studies to discuss details of <strong>the</strong> study methodology. This would<br />
ensure that <strong>the</strong> information requirements are established for <strong>the</strong> technical review of specific dredging<br />
proposals. PWGSC is <strong>the</strong> technical reviewer (for <strong>FREMP</strong> Lead Agencies) of dredging license applications.<br />
The following outlines details of hydraulic study requirements:<br />
Study Methodology<br />
The study must include an assessment of impacts to <strong>the</strong> local <strong>and</strong> downstream Fraser River hydraulic<br />
characteristics that may occur from conducting <strong>the</strong> dredging.<br />
Impacts to <strong>the</strong> following hydraulic characteristics to be considered:<br />
■ Local water levels<br />
■ Local flow velocities<br />
■ S<strong>and</strong>ation, Deposition/Accretion Patterns (local <strong>and</strong> downstream)<br />
■ Shoreline/Foreshore Erosion (local <strong>and</strong> downstream)<br />
■ Undermining of existing local marine structures<br />
Model Used<br />
Consultants are not limited to any specific model, but <strong>the</strong> model must be capable of providing water<br />
surface elevations, velocities, <strong>and</strong> erosion / accretion information at sufficient scale (or grid size) to<br />
quantitatively assess <strong>the</strong> impacts of <strong>the</strong> dredging using varying flow conditions.<br />
Calibration<br />
Hydraulic models must be calibrated using historic prototype site information from existing records<br />
(unless consultants are obtaining new field data for calibration purposes). Available velocity <strong>and</strong><br />
hydrographic survey records can be obtained from PWGSC. The model must show similarity of<br />
hydraulic characteristics of pre <strong>and</strong> post freshet conditions to prototype records to establish reliability.<br />
Model Extents<br />
Model area to be sufficient for assessing local <strong>and</strong> downstream impacts. Upstream area to be sufficient<br />
for ensuring model stability of flow.<br />
Surveys<br />
Hydraulic model must use current hydrographic survey data for baseline condition (e.g. Taken since<br />
previous freshet).<br />
55 Appendix 7
Boundary conditions<br />
Must use boundary conditions that are provided from Institute of Ocean Sciences <strong>and</strong>/or Canadian<br />
Coast Guard (when it is available) Fraser River models for calibration <strong>and</strong> assessing varying flow scenarios<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir impacts.<br />
Flow conditions<br />
Impacts of <strong>the</strong> proposed dredging must be assessed for low, average, <strong>and</strong> higher than average conditions<br />
to establish <strong>the</strong> range of potential impacts.<br />
Report<br />
Report must be provided outlining <strong>the</strong> following:<br />
■ Study methodology<br />
■ Model description<br />
■ Calibration process<br />
■ Modelling program<br />
■ Quantitative assessment of impacts on hydraulic characteristics<br />
■ Summary<br />
Study requirements established in this document are considered to be a minimum. Depending on <strong>the</strong><br />
specific dredging location <strong>and</strong> extent, more information may be required to conduct an assessment of<br />
<strong>the</strong> dredging.<br />
56 Appendix 7
Appendix 8<br />
Appendix 8<br />
Future Habitat Inventory Requirements<br />
(Source: <strong>FREMP</strong>)<br />
Proponents may, in future, be required to provide some or all of <strong>the</strong> following information in order to<br />
allow <strong>the</strong> Environmental Review Committee to better assess <strong>the</strong> impacts of dredging. Note that different<br />
sampling may be required depending on whe<strong>the</strong>r a proposed project is:<br />
■ inside or outside <strong>the</strong> deep sea channel, or<br />
■ dredged annually or dredged infrequently.<br />
The Environmental Review Committee may ask dredging applicants to provide some or all of <strong>the</strong> following<br />
information:<br />
Physical Information<br />
■ bathymetry <strong>and</strong> river velocity information measured before <strong>and</strong> after dredging.<br />
Biological Information<br />
■ suction dredge entrainment in <strong>the</strong> River.<br />
■ fish species presence/absence<br />
■ population assessments of species utilizing borrow <strong>and</strong> adjacent areas<br />
■ substrate sampling for benthic invertebrate composition<br />
■ larval fish surveys. Species may include sturgeon <strong>and</strong> eulachon.<br />
57 Appendix 8
58 Appendix 8
Appendix 9<br />
Particle Size Analysis <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />
Proponents are required to follow:<br />
■ <strong>the</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ard Practice for Dry Preparation of Soil Samples for Particle-Size Analysis outlined in ASTM<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ard D421-85, <strong>and</strong><br />
■ <strong>the</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils outlined in ASTM st<strong>and</strong>ard D422-63.<br />
59 Appendix 9
60 Appendix 9
Appendix 10<br />
<strong>Dredge</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Advisory Committee Terms of Reference<br />
(Source: <strong>FREMP</strong>)<br />
The DMAC will:<br />
■ hold meetings each year in March, July, <strong>and</strong> November to project annual allowable dredging volumes<br />
(an annual S<strong>and</strong> Budget) <strong>and</strong> to oversee <strong>the</strong> production of an annual dredging report.<br />
■ oversee <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>and</strong> maintenance of a “ S<strong>and</strong> Availability Registry” which will track <strong>the</strong> yearly<br />
removal of s<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> will help dredging proponents determine <strong>the</strong> amount of dredged material <strong>the</strong>y<br />
can apply for.<br />
DMAC membership will be:<br />
■ Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Oceans Canada<br />
~ Coast Guard<br />
~ Habitat <strong>and</strong> Enhancement Branch<br />
■ Public Works <strong>and</strong> Government Services Canada<br />
■ Environment Canada<br />
■ The Ministry of Environment, L<strong>and</strong>s & Parks<br />
~ Fish, Wildlife & Habitat Protection<br />
■ The British Columbia Assets <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Corporation<br />
■ The Fraser River Port Authority<br />
■ The North Fraser Port Authority<br />
The responsibility for carrying out DMAC actions will be shared among <strong>the</strong> government agencies identified<br />
as members of <strong>the</strong> DMAC. Secretariat functions to this group will be filled by <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> Water <strong>and</strong><br />
L<strong>and</strong> Use Coordinator.<br />
61 Appendix 10
62 Appendix 10
Instructions to <strong>the</strong><br />
Applicant<br />
The common application<br />
form is designed to provide<br />
<strong>the</strong> basic information<br />
about your proposed project<br />
required by most<br />
regulatory agencies in <strong>the</strong><br />
Fraser River Estuary. However,<br />
certain of <strong>the</strong>se<br />
agencies may require additional<br />
specific information<br />
not contained in this form.<br />
The general information<br />
requirements of all relevant<br />
federal <strong>and</strong> provincial<br />
agencies are included.<br />
This does not include information<br />
that may be<br />
required for municipal or<br />
regional government<br />
approvals. Early contact<br />
with <strong>the</strong> appropriate<br />
municipality or regional<br />
district is strongly recommended.<br />
Lead Agency Details<br />
To be filled out in conjunction<br />
with <strong>the</strong> Lead Agency.<br />
Appendix 11<br />
Dredging Application Form<br />
Coordinated Project Review Common Application Form<br />
5945 Kathleen Avenue, Suite 501<br />
Burnaby, BC V5H 4J7<br />
775 5756 tel<br />
775 5198 fax<br />
CPR #<br />
Proponent<br />
Lead Agency<br />
Lead Agency Contact<br />
Application<br />
■ New<br />
■ Renewal<br />
Purpose<br />
■ Foreshore Lease<br />
■ Use / Occupy Permit<br />
■ Dredging Licence<br />
■ MELP Waste <strong>Management</strong> Permit<br />
■ MELP Pesticide Permit<br />
■ Construction Approval<br />
Lead Agency Details<br />
Required Attachments<br />
Please note that <strong>the</strong> following attachments are required. Failure to provide accurate <strong>and</strong> complete information will<br />
result in significant delays as a new or revised application will be required.<br />
1 Folded copies of all relevant Plans must accompany <strong>the</strong> Application. The Plans must deliniate <strong>the</strong> following:<br />
Legal high water mark (must be delineated on all plans)<br />
Proposed structures<br />
Existing structures<br />
Structures to be removed<br />
Structural detail<br />
Higher high water mark <strong>and</strong> lower low water mark<br />
Cross-sectional view with higher high <strong>and</strong> lower low water marks<br />
Lease boundaries<br />
Lease dimensions (where tenure is applicable)<br />
Ingress/egress<br />
Set backs from property line<br />
Property boundary<br />
Services to property: Water, Hydro & Sewage<br />
<strong>Dredge</strong> area boundaries (where boundary is top of dredge cut)<br />
2 A copy of <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> Habitat Classification Map with location indicated<br />
3 Riparian Consent<br />
Letter of Consent <strong>and</strong> Proof of Ownership from <strong>the</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Titles Office<br />
Previous CPR # for this Location<br />
Lead Agency File #<br />
Fraser<br />
River<br />
Estuary<br />
<strong>Management</strong><br />
Program<br />
Telephone Fax<br />
■ Amendment<br />
■ O<strong>the</strong>r (Specify)<br />
■ Ocean Disposal<br />
■ Federal Fisheries Act Authorization<br />
■ MELP Water Licence<br />
■ NWPA Approval<br />
■ O<strong>the</strong>r (Specify)<br />
63 Appendix 11
Please sign <strong>and</strong> date your<br />
application before submitting<br />
<strong>the</strong> completed form.<br />
A. Applicant<br />
May be an individual or a<br />
registered company. The<br />
contact is <strong>the</strong> individual<br />
making <strong>the</strong> application or<br />
an official of <strong>the</strong> company<br />
who can supply information<br />
on <strong>the</strong> project.<br />
B. Applicant’s Representative<br />
If <strong>the</strong> applicant is being<br />
represented by ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />
individual or organization<br />
(e.g. consultant, contractor,<br />
engineering, survey or<br />
law firm, etc.), <strong>the</strong> name of<br />
<strong>the</strong> firm <strong>and</strong> name of <strong>the</strong><br />
individual within <strong>the</strong> firm<br />
who can best supply information<br />
on <strong>the</strong> project<br />
should be provided.<br />
C. Riparian Owner<br />
Name of <strong>the</strong> upl<strong>and</strong> waterfront<br />
owner in front of<br />
whose property your proposal<br />
is located, <strong>and</strong><br />
whose written consent <strong>and</strong><br />
proof of ownership from<br />
<strong>the</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Titles office, must<br />
be attached to this application.<br />
D. Surveyor<br />
This area to be completed<br />
only if <strong>the</strong> application is for<br />
tenure.<br />
E. Proposed use of <strong>the</strong><br />
Area upon Completion of<br />
Works<br />
Briefly describe <strong>the</strong> proposed<br />
use of <strong>the</strong> area after<br />
construction works have<br />
been completed. (e.g. log<br />
storage, boat or barge<br />
moorage, marina, boat<br />
repairs, habitat compensation,<br />
sewage outfalls, etc.)<br />
Attach a separate sheet if<br />
necessary.<br />
Dredging Application Form<br />
Coordinated Project Review Common Application Form<br />
5945 Kathleen Avenue, Suite 501<br />
Burnaby, BC V5H 4J7<br />
775 5756 tel<br />
775 5198 fax<br />
I, , (Please PRINT) certify that all information contained<br />
herein is true to <strong>the</strong> best of my knowledge.<br />
Applicant or Representative’s Signature<br />
A. Applicant<br />
Name<br />
Address<br />
Contact<br />
Occupation<br />
Age 19 Years or over ■ Yes ■ No<br />
Resident in BC for 2 Years ■ Yes ■ No<br />
B. Applicant’s Representative<br />
(if different from above)<br />
Name<br />
Address<br />
Contact<br />
C. Riparian Owner<br />
Name<br />
Address<br />
Contact<br />
D. Surveyor<br />
Name<br />
Contact<br />
E. Proposed Use of Area on Completion of Works<br />
Date Signed<br />
Postal Code Email<br />
Fraser<br />
River<br />
Estuary<br />
<strong>Management</strong><br />
Program<br />
Telephone Cellular Fax<br />
Company Incorporation #<br />
Canadian Citizen ■ Yes ■ No<br />
Postal Code Email<br />
Telephone Cellular Fax<br />
Postal Code Email<br />
Telephone Cellular Fax<br />
Telephone Cellular Fax<br />
64 Appendix 11
F. Project Location<br />
Give <strong>the</strong> legal description<br />
<strong>and</strong> Upl<strong>and</strong> municipal<br />
address of <strong>the</strong> project, if<br />
applicable, or some reference<br />
to allow inspecting<br />
personnel to find <strong>the</strong> site.<br />
Include <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> Habitat<br />
Classification Map number<br />
<strong>and</strong> Habitat Classification<br />
Colour Code. If you have<br />
GPS information for your<br />
site, please include coordinates,<br />
coordinate system,<br />
datum, <strong>and</strong> zone.<br />
G. Project Details<br />
Be sure to answer every<br />
question by checking <strong>the</strong><br />
appropriate response. If<br />
“yes”, please provide a<br />
concise explanation.<br />
Items marked with asterisk<br />
(*) may require a separate<br />
application to <strong>the</strong> agency<br />
indiated<br />
F. Project Location<br />
Legal Description of Upl<strong>and</strong><br />
Municipality<br />
G. Project Details<br />
Does <strong>the</strong> Project…<br />
a. Involve <strong>the</strong> construction of new structures or<br />
expansion/improvement of existing facilities?<br />
■ Yes ■ No<br />
b. Involve demolition or removal <strong>and</strong> disposal of<br />
existing structures?<br />
■ Yes ■ No<br />
c. Require municipal servicing?<br />
■ Yes ■ No<br />
d. Involve moorage of float home(s) or live aboard<br />
vessels?<br />
■ Yes ■ No<br />
e. Involve dyke construction or affect existing dykes?<br />
■ Yes ■ No<br />
f.* Involve diversion or consumption of water?*<br />
(BCEL Water License Application)<br />
■ Yes ■ No<br />
g.* Generate wastes requiring disposal?* (BCEL<br />
Waste <strong>Management</strong> Permit Application)<br />
■ Yes ■ No<br />
h.* Involve use, production or h<strong>and</strong>ling of hazardous<br />
materials?* (BCEL Waste <strong>Management</strong> Permit)<br />
■ Yes ■ No<br />
i.* Involve l<strong>and</strong>s which are included in <strong>the</strong> Site<br />
Registry established under Contaminated Sites legislation<br />
<strong>and</strong> administered by <strong>the</strong> Ministry of<br />
Environment, L<strong>and</strong>s Parks?<br />
■ Yes ■ No<br />
j.* Involve use or application of pesticides or herbicides?*<br />
(BCEL Pesticide Permit Application)<br />
■ Yes ■ No<br />
k.* Involve ocean disposal of material?* (DOE Ocean<br />
Disposal Permit Application)<br />
■ Yes ■ No<br />
l. Involve use of l<strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Agricultural L<strong>and</strong><br />
Reserve?<br />
■ Yes ■ No<br />
Street Address<br />
<strong>FREMP</strong> Habitat Classification Map #<br />
Habitat Classification<br />
GPS Coordinates (if available)<br />
If yes, explain<br />
If yes, explain<br />
If yes, explain<br />
If yes, explain<br />
If yes, explain<br />
If yes, explain<br />
If yes, describe type <strong>and</strong> quantity<br />
If yes, explain<br />
If yes, provide relevant SITE #(s)<br />
If yes, explain<br />
If yes, explain<br />
Indicate Municipal or Regional district zoning<br />
65 Appendix 11
H. Proposed Works <strong>and</strong><br />
Construction Methods<br />
Describe all activities or<br />
construction works<br />
involved in your project<br />
(e.g. inwater works, foreshore<br />
works, debris<br />
control, dredging, pile driving,<br />
log debris removal,<br />
etc.)<br />
Include a concise description<br />
of <strong>the</strong> methods,<br />
equipment, <strong>and</strong> materials<br />
used for construction.<br />
Attach a separate sheet if<br />
necessary.<br />
If <strong>the</strong> following materials<br />
are to be used, include <strong>the</strong><br />
appropriate details:<br />
Fill – volume, nature <strong>and</strong><br />
source<br />
Piles – number to be<br />
removed or added, material,<br />
<strong>and</strong> proposed<br />
treatment. (e.g. timber,<br />
steel, concrete, plastic,<br />
green stick, creosote,<br />
sheet pile bulkhead or timber<br />
bulkhead, etc.)<br />
Rip rap – size <strong>and</strong> slope,<br />
linear shoreline length,<br />
<strong>and</strong> area<br />
I. Details<br />
On <strong>the</strong> cross-section diagram,<br />
indicate <strong>the</strong><br />
biological zones affected<br />
<strong>and</strong> calculate <strong>the</strong> surface<br />
area to be affected by construction.<br />
Does this Project Require…<br />
If you answer “yes” to any<br />
of <strong>the</strong>se categories, please<br />
make sure you have completed<br />
section H<br />
completely <strong>and</strong> fill in <strong>the</strong><br />
appropriate blanks.<br />
H. Proposed Works <strong>and</strong> Construction Methods<br />
Describe Proposed Commencement Date for Works<br />
I. Details<br />
Indicate <strong>the</strong> area affected using <strong>the</strong> diagram below as a guide to zones. Enter area affected in <strong>the</strong> appropriate space<br />
in <strong>the</strong> diagram.<br />
HIGH<br />
TIDE<br />
LOW<br />
TIDE<br />
AREA=<br />
SUBMERGED<br />
Does this Project Require…<br />
AREA=<br />
INTERTIDAL<br />
MUD / SAND FLAT<br />
Proposed Completion Date for Works<br />
Hours of Construction<br />
■ Fill Area= m x m Volume= m<br />
■ Dredging Area= m x m Volume= m<br />
■ Rip rap Area= m x m Linear Shoreline Length= m<br />
■ Piles Number Type<br />
INTERTIDAL MARSH RIPARIAN VEGETATION<br />
_________ m x _________m _________ m x _________m _________ m x _________m _________ m x _________m<br />
shoreline shoreline shoreline shoreline<br />
66 Appendix 11<br />
AREA=<br />
AREA=
BOWEN<br />
ISLAND<br />
MILES<br />
1 2 3 4<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6<br />
KILOMETRES<br />
Point<br />
Atkinson<br />
Point Grey<br />
Sturgeon Bank<br />
Roberts Bank<br />
J. Location Map<br />
With an arrow, indicate <strong>the</strong> location of <strong>the</strong> project on <strong>the</strong> following map. Please add any additional references, which<br />
will help to locate your project. (e.g. street names, l<strong>and</strong>marks, etc.)<br />
If you have GPS coordinates for your project site, please include this information in Section F.<br />
If your project is not within <strong>the</strong> white area of <strong>the</strong> map, you are not in <strong>the</strong> <strong>FREMP</strong> boundaries.<br />
WEST VANCOUVER NORTH VANCOUVER<br />
English<br />
Bay<br />
Cap i l a n o River<br />
Burrard Inlet<br />
NORTH<br />
VANCOUVER<br />
CITY<br />
Deep<br />
Cove<br />
BELCARRA<br />
ANMORE<br />
Outer Harbour Inner Harbour Central Harbour<br />
Sea Isl<strong>and</strong><br />
Westham<br />
Isl<strong>and</strong><br />
Fals e C r e e k<br />
VANCOUVER<br />
RICHMOND<br />
Brunswick Point<br />
Lulu Isl<strong>and</strong><br />
POINT<br />
ROBERTS<br />
Lynn Creek<br />
North Arm<br />
South Arm<br />
S e y mour River<br />
DELTA<br />
BURNABY<br />
NEW<br />
WESTMINSTER<br />
Annacis<br />
Isl<strong>and</strong><br />
Boundary Bay<br />
CANADA<br />
U.S.A.<br />
I ndian Arm<br />
Brunette River<br />
PORT<br />
MOODY<br />
Fraser River<br />
SURREY<br />
WHITE ROCK<br />
Semiahmoo Bay<br />
COQUITLAM<br />
PORT<br />
COQUITLAM<br />
Serpent ine Rive r<br />
Nicomekl River<br />
PITT<br />
MEADOWS<br />
Barnston<br />
Isl<strong>and</strong><br />
C am p b ell River<br />
Alouette River<br />
MAPLE RIDGE<br />
LANGLEY<br />
BRITISH<br />
COLUMBIA<br />
Kanaka Creek<br />
PACIFIC OCEAN FRASER<br />
RIVER<br />
BASIN<br />
67 Appendix 11<br />
Coquitlam River<br />
Pitt River
68 Appendix 11