07.01.2013 Views

The Philippine Clinical Practice Guideline on the Diagnosis and ...

The Philippine Clinical Practice Guideline on the Diagnosis and ...

The Philippine Clinical Practice Guideline on the Diagnosis and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Clinical</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Practice</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Guideline</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> Management of Urinary Tract Infecti<strong>on</strong>s:<br />

A Quick Reference Guide for Clinicians*<br />

Report of <strong>the</strong> Task Force <strong>on</strong> Urinary Tract Infecti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

1998<br />

(*Editors note: <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Task Force <strong>on</strong> Urinary Tract Infecti<strong>on</strong>s plan to meet in <strong>the</strong> last quarter of this year to lay out plans<br />

to review <strong>the</strong> guideline. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Task Force plans to finish before <strong>the</strong> end of year 2004. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> summaries of evidence were<br />

omitted for this quick reference. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> summaries of evidences are in <strong>the</strong> complete guideline pamphlet available at <strong>the</strong><br />

PSMID office.)<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s (UTIs) are am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> most comm<strong>on</strong> infecti<strong>on</strong>s encountered by physicians. In<br />

clinics of tertiary centers in Manila, Cavite <strong>and</strong> Zamboanga, <strong>the</strong>y account for 5 to 17% of c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong>s. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Renal Disease Registry of <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Society of Nephrology reports chr<strong>on</strong>ic pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis as <strong>the</strong> cause<br />

of end stage renal disease in 11% of patients undergoing maintenance dialysis <strong>and</strong> 8% of kidney transplant patients<br />

from six centers. UTI’s also c<strong>on</strong>stitute over 40% of hospital-acquired infecti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> clinical practice guidelines, (CPGs) <strong>on</strong> UTI’s are formulated to assist practiti<strong>on</strong>ers in <strong>the</strong> diagnosis,<br />

treatment <strong>and</strong> preventi<strong>on</strong> of UTI in adults. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> targeted users are general practiti<strong>on</strong>ers, family physicians <strong>and</strong><br />

specialists.<br />

To cover <strong>the</strong> various important issues <strong>on</strong> UTI management, recommendati<strong>on</strong>s are provided for each of <strong>the</strong><br />

following eight clinical syndromes, which differ from <strong>on</strong>e ano<strong>the</strong>r in terms of clinical presentati<strong>on</strong>, epidemiologic<br />

setting <strong>and</strong> requirements for antimicrobial <strong>the</strong>rapy: acute uncomplicated cystitis, acute uncomplicated pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis,<br />

asymptomatic bacteriuria, UTI in pregnancy, recurrent UTI, complicated UTI, UTI in men <strong>and</strong> ca<strong>the</strong>ter-associated<br />

UTI.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se recommendati<strong>on</strong>s are based <strong>on</strong> evidence derived from critical review of existing data <strong>and</strong> utilize<br />

modificati<strong>on</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> quality st<strong>and</strong>ards of <strong>the</strong> Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>y are given<br />

alphabetical ranking to reflect <strong>the</strong>ir strength.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> st<strong>and</strong>ards are not intended to supplant good clinical judgment. This caveat applies to all<br />

recommendati<strong>on</strong>s, particularly those for which <strong>the</strong>re is inadequate evidence for or against <strong>the</strong>ir use (Grade C). Despite<br />

lack of quality evidence, some recommendati<strong>on</strong>s which are based <strong>on</strong> clinical experience, descriptive studies <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sensus reports of expert committees have been provided to specifically address comm<strong>on</strong> problems which c<strong>on</strong>fr<strong>on</strong>t<br />

health care providers <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir patients. [Phil J Microbiol Infect Dis 2002; 31(1):27-44]<br />

Key Words: urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s, guideline, practice guideline<br />

I. ACUTE UNCOMPLICATED CYSTITIS IN WOMEN<br />

1. Definiti<strong>on</strong><br />

1.1 Acute uncomplicated cystitis in women is defined as growth of ≥ 100 col<strong>on</strong>y forming units<br />

(cfu)/ml of mid-stream urine (msu) in n<strong>on</strong>-pregnant women (18 to 50 years old), presenting<br />

with. (a) any of <strong>the</strong> following symptoms: dysuria, frequency, urgency, gross hematuria, or<br />

hypogastric pains; <strong>and</strong> (b) without symptoms of vaginitis, pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis, <strong>and</strong> risks factors for<br />

subacute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis or complicated UTI (Table 1) (Grade A). For inclusi<strong>on</strong> of patients in<br />

clinical trials, a diagnostic criteri<strong>on</strong> of > 1,000 cfu/ml is recommended (Grade C).<br />

Note: A table summarizing laboratory criteria for significant bacteriuria <strong>and</strong> pyuria for various UTI syndromes is<br />

found in Appendix 3. Laboratory criteria are based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> requisite that urine specimens are properly collected <strong>and</strong><br />

h<strong>and</strong>led (see Appendix 4).<br />

1.2 In <strong>the</strong> absence of a urine culture, <strong>the</strong> laboratory diagnosis of acute cystitis can be determined<br />

by <strong>the</strong> presence of significant pyuria defined as: (a) 8 or more pus cells/ mm 3 of uncentrifuged


urine; or (b) 5 or more pus cells/hpf of centrifuged urine; or (c) positive leukocyte esterase test<br />

<strong>and</strong> nitrite test (Grade C).<br />

Note. Pyuria per se is not automatically equated with UTI. O<strong>the</strong>r important causes are listed in Appendix 5.<br />

Table 1. Risk factors for subacute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis or complicated UTI<br />

Hospital acquired infecti<strong>on</strong><br />

Indwelling urinary ca<strong>the</strong>ter<br />

Recent urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong><br />

Recent urinary tract instrumentati<strong>on</strong> (in <strong>the</strong> past 2 weeks)<br />

Functi<strong>on</strong>al or anatomic abnormality of <strong>the</strong> urinary tract<br />

Recent anti-microbial use (in <strong>the</strong> past 2 weeks)<br />

Symptoms for > 7 days at presentati<strong>on</strong><br />

Diabetes mellitus<br />

Immunosuppressi<strong>on</strong><br />

2. Pre-treatment diagnostic tests<br />

Pre-treatment urine culture <strong>and</strong> sensitivity is not recommended (Grade E). St<strong>and</strong>ard urine<br />

microscopy using a hemocytometer <strong>and</strong> dipstick leukocyte esterase <strong>and</strong> nitrite tests are not<br />

prerequisites for treatment (Grade D).<br />

3. Durati<strong>on</strong> of treatment<br />

A 3-day course of anti-microbial <strong>the</strong>rapy is effective. However, patients should be<br />

advised to come back if symptoms persist or recur (Grade C).<br />

Table 2. Three-day regimen for acute uncomplicated cystitis<br />

TMP/SMX 1601800 mg BID<br />

Nitrofurantoin 100 mg QID<br />

Norfloxacin 400 mg BID<br />

Ciprofloxacin 250 mg BID<br />

Pefloxacin 400 mg BID<br />

Ofloxacin 200 mg BID<br />

Co-amoxiclav 375 mg TID<br />

4. Choice of Antibiotics<br />

Any of <strong>the</strong> antimicrobials listed in Table 2 can he used (Grade A). Ampicillin <strong>and</strong><br />

amoxicillin should not be used (Grade E). In areas where trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole<br />

(TMP/SMX) resistance is not a problem, <strong>the</strong> first line drug is still TMP/SMX. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> recommended<br />

antimicrobials may change depending <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> local patterns of susceptibility. Cost <strong>and</strong> side effects<br />

are additi<strong>on</strong>al factors to he c<strong>on</strong>sidered in <strong>the</strong> choice (Grade C). (See Appendix 6 for costs of<br />

antimicrobial regimens)<br />

5. Post-treatment follow-up<br />

5.1 Routine post-treatment urine culture <strong>and</strong> urinalysis in asymptomatic patients are not<br />

recommended (Grade C).<br />

5.2 Patients whose symptoms worsen or do not improve after 3 days should have a urine culture<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> antimicrobial should be empirically changed, pending result of sensitivity testing (Grade<br />

C).


5.3 Patients whose symptoms improve but do not completely resolve after 3 days should<br />

complete a 7-day course of <strong>the</strong> same antimicrobial. Patients whose symptoms fail to resolve<br />

after <strong>the</strong> 7-day treatment should be managed like a complicated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> [(see<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> VI) (Grade C)].<br />

II. ACUTE UNCOMPLICATED PYELONEPHRITIS<br />

1. Definiti<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> classic syndrome of acute uncomplicated pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis (AUPN) is characterized by<br />

fever (>38 o C), chills, flank pain, cost vertebral angle tenderness, nausea <strong>and</strong> vomiting, with or<br />

without signs <strong>and</strong> symptoms of lower urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> (dysuria, frequency, urgency <strong>and</strong><br />

hematuria) in an o<strong>the</strong>rwise healthy female with no clinical or historical evidence of structural or<br />

functi<strong>on</strong>al urologic abnormalities (Rubin 1992). Laboratory findings include pyuria (> 5 wbc/hpf<br />

of centrifuged urine) <strong>and</strong> bacteriuria with counts of > 10,000 cfu of an uropathogen/ml in culture<br />

of voided urine (Rubin 1992, Roberts 1986).<br />

2. Etiologic <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

2.1 Gram stain of uncentrifuged urine is recommended to differentiate gram-positive from gramnegative<br />

bacteria, <strong>the</strong> result of which can guide choice of empiric <strong>the</strong>rapy (Grade C). Quantitative<br />

urine culture <strong>and</strong> sensitivity test should also he performed routinely to allow for more precise <strong>and</strong><br />

cost-effective use of antimicrobial agents <strong>and</strong> because of <strong>the</strong> potential for serious sequelae if an<br />

inappropriate antimicrobial regimen is used (Grade C).<br />

2.2 Blood cultures (d<strong>on</strong>e twice) are recommended for those who are ill enough to require<br />

hospitalizati<strong>on</strong>, particularly those with suspected sepsis (Grade C).<br />

3. Treatment<br />

Premise: <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> main <strong>the</strong>rapeutic objectives are to eradicate organisms invading <strong>the</strong> renal<br />

parenchyma <strong>and</strong> to anticipate <strong>the</strong> need to treat bacteremia <strong>and</strong> prevent metastatic infecti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Choice of antimicrobial regimen depends <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> locally prevailing sensitivity patterns of comm<strong>on</strong><br />

uropathogens, case of administrati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> relative costs.<br />

3.1 Outpatient vs. inpatient <strong>the</strong>rapy. N<strong>on</strong>-pregnant patients with no signs <strong>and</strong> symptoms of sepsis,<br />

who are compliant <strong>and</strong> are likely to return for follow-up if symptoms do not resolve, may be<br />

treated as outpatients (Grade C). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> following are indicati<strong>on</strong>s for admissi<strong>on</strong>: inability to<br />

maintain oral hydrati<strong>on</strong> or take medicati<strong>on</strong>s; c<strong>on</strong>cern about compliance; uncertainty about <strong>the</strong><br />

diagnosis; severe illness with high fever, severe pain, marked debility <strong>and</strong> signs of sepsis (Grade<br />

C).<br />

3.2 Selecti<strong>on</strong> of antimicrobial <strong>the</strong>rapy. Several regimens, which have been found to be effective,<br />

are recommended [(see Table 3) (Grades A-B)]. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> aminopenicillins (ampicillin or amoxicillin)<br />

<strong>and</strong> first-generati<strong>on</strong> cephalosporins are not recommended (Grade E). If <strong>the</strong>re is increasing<br />

resistance to TMP/SMX in <strong>the</strong> area, this drug is also not recommended (Grade E). Combining<br />

ampicillin with an aminoglycoside offers no added benefit, except when enterococcal infecti<strong>on</strong> is<br />

suspected (Grade C). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> choice of c<strong>on</strong>tinued antibiotic <strong>the</strong>rapy should be guided by <strong>the</strong> urine<br />

culture <strong>and</strong> sensitivity result <strong>on</strong>ce available (Grade C).


3.3 Route of administrati<strong>on</strong>. Patients with mild to moderate symptoms can he treated with oral<br />

antimicrobials for <strong>the</strong> total durati<strong>on</strong> of treatment (Grade B). Parenteral <strong>the</strong>rapy is recommended<br />

for initial management of patients who may have severe infecti<strong>on</strong> (presence of chills, fever,<br />

vomiting with or without shock) <strong>and</strong> for patients with nausea, vomiting or ileus (Grade C).<br />

Switching to an oral regimen is appropriate <strong>on</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> patient is a febrile for at least 24 hours <strong>and</strong> is<br />

able to take <strong>the</strong> drug orally (Grade C).<br />

3.4 Durati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>rapy. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> recommended durati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong>rapy for AUPN is 14 days for most<br />

antimicrobials, except for ciprofloxacin for which 7 days is sufficient (Grade A). Treatment for<br />

l<strong>on</strong>ger than 14 days has no added benefit <strong>and</strong> is not recommended (Grade E).<br />

Table 3. Treatment regimens for uncomplicated acute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis<br />

Characteristic Pathogens <str<strong>on</strong>g>Clinical</str<strong>on</strong>g> Situati<strong>on</strong> Recommended Empiric Treatment<br />

E. coli,<br />

P. mirabilis,<br />

K. pneum<strong>on</strong>iae,<br />

S. saprophyticus<br />

Mild-to-moderate illness,<br />

no nausea or vomiting,<br />

- outpatient <strong>the</strong>rapy<br />

Severe illness or<br />

possible urosepsis<br />

- hospitalizati<strong>on</strong> required<br />

Oral*<br />

fluoroquinol<strong>on</strong>e, TMP/SMX or co-amoxiclav for 14 days<br />

Parentereral**<br />

aminoglycoside, fluoroquinol<strong>on</strong>e or third generati<strong>on</strong><br />

cephalosporin until fever is g<strong>on</strong>e (usually after 24-48 hrs),<br />

<strong>the</strong>n<br />

oral fluoroquinol<strong>on</strong>es or TMP/SMX to complete 14 days<br />

*Oral regimens: ciprofloxacin 500 mg every 12 hours; ofloxacin 200 mg every 12 hours; norfloxacin 400 mg<br />

every 12 hours; lomefloxacin 400 mg <strong>on</strong>ce a day; TMP/SMX 160/800 mg every 12 hours; co-amoxiclav 625 mg.<br />

every 8 hours. Ciprofloxacin may be given for seven days (see Secti<strong>on</strong> 3.4).<br />

**Parenteral regimens: ceftriax<strong>on</strong>e 1-2 g <strong>on</strong>ce a day; ciprofloxacin 200-400mg every 12 hours; ofloxacin 200-400<br />

mg every 12 hours; gentamicin 3-5 mg/kg <strong>on</strong>ce a day or 1 mg/kg every 8 hours.<br />

4. Work-up for urologic abnormalities<br />

Routine urologic evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> routine use of imaging procedures are not recommended<br />

(Grade D). Radiologic evaluati<strong>on</strong> should he c<strong>on</strong>sidered if <strong>the</strong> patient remains febrile within 72<br />

hours of treatment to rule out <strong>the</strong> presence of nephrolithiasis, renal or perirenal abscesses, or o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

complicati<strong>on</strong>s of pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis, or if <strong>the</strong>re is recurrence of symptoms (Grade C). Urologic<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong> should be obtained if deemed appropriate (Grade C).<br />

5. Follow-up cultures during <strong>and</strong> post-<strong>the</strong>rapy<br />

In patients who are clinically resp<strong>on</strong>ding to <strong>the</strong>rapy (usually apparent in < 72 hours after<br />

initiati<strong>on</strong> of treatment), <strong>the</strong>re is no need for a follow-up urine culture (Grade C). Routine posttreatment<br />

cultures in asymptomatic patients are also not indicated except in patients who initially<br />

present with sepsis (Grade C). In women whose symptoms do not improve during <strong>the</strong>rapy <strong>and</strong> in<br />

those whose symptoms recur after treatment, a repeat urine culture <strong>and</strong> sensitivity test should be<br />

performed (Grade C).<br />

6. Re-treatment<br />

Recurrence of symptoms requires antibiotic treatment based <strong>on</strong> results of urine culture <strong>and</strong><br />

sensitivity test, in additi<strong>on</strong> to assessment for underlying genito-urologic abnormality (Grade C).<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> durati<strong>on</strong> of re-treatment in <strong>the</strong> absence of a urologic abnormality is 2 weeks (Grade C). For<br />

those patients who relapse with <strong>the</strong> same strain as <strong>the</strong> initially infecting strain, a 4-6 week<br />

regimen is recommended (Grade C).


III. ASYMYPTOMATIC BACTERIURIA<br />

1. Definiti<strong>on</strong><br />

Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is defined clinically by: (a) <strong>the</strong> presence of > 100,000<br />

cfu/ml of <strong>on</strong>e or more uropathogens <strong>on</strong> two c<strong>on</strong>secutive midstream urine specimens or <strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>e<br />

ca<strong>the</strong>terized urine specimen; <strong>and</strong> (b) <strong>the</strong> absence of symptoms attributable to urinary tract<br />

infecti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> risk groups most likely to have asymptomatic bacteriuria are: (1) <strong>the</strong> elderly<br />

populati<strong>on</strong>, especially women; (2) women with diabetes mellitus; (3) individuals with l<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />

indwelling ca<strong>the</strong>ters; (4) patients with genitourinary abnormalities; <strong>and</strong> (5) renal transplant<br />

recipients (Grade B). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> risk of asymptomatic bacteriuria am<strong>on</strong>g pregnant women is discussed<br />

in Secti<strong>on</strong> IV. Infecti<strong>on</strong>s in renal transplant recipients are discussed in Secti<strong>on</strong> VI.<br />

2. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria<br />

Periodic testing for asymptomatic bacteriuria <strong>and</strong> treatment with antimicrobials is not<br />

recommended in <strong>the</strong> elderly (Grade D), in individuals with indwelling ca<strong>the</strong>ters (Grade E),<br />

immunocompromised patients (Grade C) <strong>and</strong> in patients with urological abnormalities (Grade C).<br />

Screening by urine culture is recommended in <strong>the</strong> following patients with diabetes<br />

mellitus, patients who will undergo genitourinary manipulati<strong>on</strong> or instrumentati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong> after<br />

ca<strong>the</strong>ter removal (Grade C). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> frequency of screening is left to <strong>the</strong> discreti<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> clinician<br />

(Grade C).<br />

In <strong>the</strong> absence of urine culture facilities, significant pyuria (> 10 wbc/hpf or a positive<br />

gram stain of unspun urine (2 microorganisms/oif) in 2 c<strong>on</strong>secutive midstream urine samples can<br />

he used to screen for asymptomatic bacteriuria (Grade C). Urine culture <strong>and</strong> sensitivity testing are<br />

not necessary when urinalysis or gram stain of urine is normal (Grade C).<br />

It should be noted that pyuria is not an accurate screening test for bacteriuria in patients<br />

with poor inflammatory resp<strong>on</strong>se, e.g. immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients, or patients<br />

with diabetic nephropathy <strong>and</strong> azotemia.<br />

3. Treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria<br />

Treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria may he c<strong>on</strong>sidered in <strong>the</strong> following patients: (a)<br />

persistent bacteriuria after ca<strong>the</strong>ter removal (Grade B); (b) patients who will undergo<br />

genitourinary manipulati<strong>on</strong> or instrumentati<strong>on</strong>; (c) diabetic patients; <strong>and</strong> (d) patients with<br />

abnormal genitourinary tract (Grade C). (See Secti<strong>on</strong> VI for treatment regimens).<br />

For asymptomatic funguria, removal of predisposing factors, such as urinary ca<strong>the</strong>ters or<br />

prol<strong>on</strong>ged antibiotic use will generally result in sp<strong>on</strong>taneous resoluti<strong>on</strong> (Grade C). Treatment is<br />

not recommended in <strong>the</strong> following groups: (a) patients with l<strong>on</strong>g-term indwelling ca<strong>the</strong>ters<br />

(Grade E); (b) ambulatory elderly men <strong>and</strong> women (Grade D); <strong>and</strong> (c) patients with short-term<br />

indwelling ca<strong>the</strong>ters (Grade C).<br />

IV. URINARY TRACT INFECTION IN PREGNANCY<br />

A. ASYMPTOMATIC BACTERIURIA (ASB) IN PREGNANCY<br />

1. Definiti<strong>on</strong>


Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy is defined clinically by: (a) >100,000 cfu/ml with<br />

<strong>on</strong>e or more organisms in two c<strong>on</strong>secutive mid-stream urine specimens or <strong>on</strong>e ca<strong>the</strong>terized urine<br />

specimen, <strong>and</strong> (b) <strong>the</strong> absence of symptoms attributable to urinary infecti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

2. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy<br />

All pregnant women, particularly those at high risk of developing acute cystitis <strong>and</strong> acute<br />

pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis, e.g. diabetics <strong>and</strong> those with a previous history of UTI, must be screened for<br />

asymptomatic bacteriuria <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir first prenatal visit (Grade A).<br />

2.2 A st<strong>and</strong>ard urine culture using a clean catch midstream urine is <strong>the</strong> test of choice in screening<br />

for asymptomatic bacteriuria (Grade A). In areas where urine culture facilities are not available, a<br />

urine gram stain is an acceptable substitute (Grade C). Leukocyte esterase <strong>and</strong> nitrite tests are not<br />

recommended for screening for ASB (Grade E). Urinalysis al<strong>on</strong>e is not recommended for<br />

screening (Grade C).<br />

3. Treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy<br />

3.1 Antibiotic treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria is indicated to reduce <strong>the</strong> risk of acute<br />

cystitis <strong>and</strong> pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis in pregnancy as well as reduce <strong>the</strong> risk of LBW ne<strong>on</strong>ates <strong>and</strong> preterm<br />

infants (Grade A).<br />

3.2 It is recommended that antibiotic treatment he initiated up<strong>on</strong> diagnosis of ASB in pregnancy.<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> drugs, which can be used, are nitrofurantoin, amoxicillin, cephalexin, co-amoxiclav<br />

<strong>and</strong> TMP/-SMX (not in 3rd trimester) (Grade C). A 7-day course is recommended (Grade C). A<br />

follow-up culture should be d<strong>on</strong>e <strong>on</strong>e week after completing <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong>rapy (Grade C).<br />

B. ACUTE CYSTITIS IN PREGNANCY<br />

1. Definiti<strong>on</strong><br />

Acute cystitis is characterized by urinary frequency <strong>and</strong> urgency, dysuria <strong>and</strong> bacteriuria<br />

but not by fever <strong>and</strong> costovertebral angle tenderness. Gross hematuria may also be present (Harris<br />

1984). In <strong>the</strong> absence of a urine culture, <strong>the</strong> laboratory diagnosis of acute cystitis can he<br />

determined by <strong>the</strong> presence of significant pyuria defined as: (a) 8 or more pus cells/mm 3 of<br />

uncentrifuged urine OR, (b) 5 or more pus cells/hpf of centrifuged urine, <strong>and</strong> (c) positive<br />

leukocyte esterase <strong>and</strong> nitrate test (Grade C).<br />

2. Treatment<br />

Treatment of acute cystitis in pregnancy should be instituted immediately to prevent <strong>the</strong><br />

spread of <strong>the</strong> infecti<strong>on</strong> ascending to <strong>the</strong> kidney (Grade A). Since E. coli remains to be <strong>the</strong> most<br />

comm<strong>on</strong> organism isolated drugs to which this organism is most sensitive <strong>and</strong> which are safe to<br />

give during pregnancy should he used (Grade A). A 7-day course is recommended (Grade C).<br />

C. ACUTE PYELONEPHRITIS IN PREGNANCY<br />

1. Definiti<strong>on</strong><br />

Acute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis, an inflammati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> renal parenchyma, is characterized by<br />

shaking chills, fever (> 38 o C), flank pain, nausea <strong>and</strong> vomiting, with or without signs <strong>and</strong>


symptoms of lower urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> (frequency, urgency, dysuria <strong>and</strong> hematuria) <strong>and</strong><br />

physical findings of costovertebral angle tenderness. Urinalysis shows pyuria of > 5 wbc/hpf of<br />

centrifuged urine <strong>and</strong> bacteriuria of >10,000 cfu of an uropathogen/ml of urine (Rubin 1992,<br />

Robert 1986, Harris 1984).<br />

2. Etiologic diagnosis<br />

2.1 Gram stain of uncentrifuged urine is recommended to differentiate gram positive from gramnegative<br />

bacteriuria, <strong>the</strong> result of which can guide choice of empiric <strong>the</strong>rapy (Grade C).<br />

Quantitative urine culture <strong>and</strong> sensitivity test should also be performed routinely to allow for<br />

more precise <strong>and</strong> cost-effective use of antimicrobial agents <strong>and</strong> because of <strong>the</strong> potential for<br />

serious sequelae if an inappropriate antimicrobial regimen is used (Grade C).<br />

2.2 Blood cultures (d<strong>on</strong>e twice) are recommended for all pregnant patients with acute<br />

pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis (Grade C).<br />

3. Treatment<br />

3.1 All pregnant patients with acute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis should be hospitalized <strong>and</strong> immediate<br />

antimicrobial <strong>the</strong>rapy instituted (Grade A). Treatment durati<strong>on</strong> is 14 days (Grade C). Choice of<br />

antibiotics is as for acute uncomplicated pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis except for drug’s c<strong>on</strong>traindicated in<br />

pregnancy (see Table 4) (Grade C).<br />

3.2 For pregnant patients with no signs <strong>and</strong> symptoms of sepsis <strong>and</strong> are able to take medicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

by mouth, oral antibiotics may he given as first line drugs (grade A). Empiric choice should be<br />

based <strong>on</strong> local susceptibility patterns of uropathogens (Grade C).<br />

Table 4. Antibiotic use in pregnancy<br />

Safe Use with cauti<strong>on</strong> C<strong>on</strong>traindicated<br />

Cephalosporins Aminoglycoside Tetracycline<br />

Co-amoxiclav TMP/SMX (1st & 2nd trimester) Fluoroquinol<strong>on</strong>e<br />

Ampicillin-sulbactam TMP/SMX (3rd) trimester<br />

Aztre<strong>on</strong>am (probably)<br />

(Reese <strong>and</strong> Betts 1996)<br />

V. RECURRENT URINARY TRACT INFECTION<br />

1. Definiti<strong>on</strong><br />

Recurrent UTI is defined as episodes of acute uncomplicated UTI documented by urine<br />

culture occurring more than twice a year in a n<strong>on</strong>-pregnant woman with no known urinary tract<br />

abnormalities (Kraft 1977, Stamm 1980).<br />

2. Treatment of individual episodes<br />

Seven-day treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanate, Cephradine, ciprofloxacin <strong>and</strong><br />

lomefloxacin is effective (Grade A). Three-day treatment with any of <strong>the</strong> antibiotics for simple<br />

uncomplicated cystitis (see Secti<strong>on</strong> 1) may be an acceptable alternative (Grade C). Intermittent<br />

self-administered <strong>the</strong>rapy, wherein <strong>the</strong> patients are apprised of <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> signs <strong>and</strong> symptoms<br />

of UTI <strong>and</strong> instructed to take four tablets of TMP/SMX (40 mg/200 mg) single dose as so<strong>on</strong> as


symptoms first appear, may be recommended in well-instructed <strong>and</strong> highly educated patients<br />

(Grade A).<br />

3. Prophylaxis<br />

3.1 Indicati<strong>on</strong> for prophylaxis. Prophylaxis is recommended in women whose frequency of<br />

recurrence is not acceptable to <strong>the</strong> patient in terms of level of discomfort or interference with her<br />

normal activities. Prophylaxis may be withheld according to patient preference if <strong>the</strong> frequency of<br />

recurrence is tolerable to <strong>the</strong> patient (Grade C).<br />

3.2 Prophylactic strategy. If prophylaxis is to be given, ei<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> following regimens is<br />

recommended: (1) c<strong>on</strong>tinuous prophylaxis, defined as <strong>the</strong> daily intake of a low dose of antiantibiotic,<br />

or 2) post-coital prophylaxis, defined as <strong>the</strong> intake of a single dose of antibiotic<br />

immediately after sexual intercourse (Grade A).<br />

3.3 Choice <strong>and</strong> dose of antibiotic. A number of antibiotics given c<strong>on</strong>tinuously for 6 m<strong>on</strong>ths have<br />

been proven to effectively reduce <strong>the</strong> number of episodes of UTI (See Table 5) (Grade A). Postcoital<br />

prophylaxis with a number of antibiotics has also been proven to be effective (see Table 5)<br />

(Grade A).<br />

Table 5. Antibiotics which have been proven to be effective in reducing <strong>the</strong> number of recurrences of UTI <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir recommended doses <strong>and</strong> regimens<br />

Recommended dose for c<strong>on</strong>tinuous prophylaxis Recommended Dose for post-coital prophylaxis<br />

Nitrofurantoin 100 mg at bedtime<br />

Norfloxacin 200 mg at bedtime 200 mg<br />

TMP/SMX 40 mg/200 mg at bedtime 40 mg/200 mg<br />

Ciprofloxacin 125 mg at bedtime 125 mg<br />

Ofloxacin 100 mg<br />

References: Pfau 1994, Staplet<strong>on</strong> 1990, Brumfitt 1991, Brumfitt 1995, Stamey 1977, Stamm 1980, Nicolle 1989,<br />

Melekos 1997<br />

3.4 Durati<strong>on</strong> of prophylaxis. Six-m<strong>on</strong>th c<strong>on</strong>tinuous or post-coital prophylaxis effectively reduces<br />

<strong>the</strong> number of UTI episodes (Grade A).<br />

3.5 Treatment of breakthrough infecti<strong>on</strong>s during prophylaxis. Breakthrough infecti<strong>on</strong>s during<br />

prophylaxis should he initially treated with any of <strong>the</strong> antibiotics recommended for<br />

uncomplicated cystitis o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> antibiotic being given for prophylaxis (Grade B). A urine<br />

culture should he requested <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> treatment modified accordingly.<br />

4. Diagnostic work-up for urologic abnormalities.<br />

4.1 Indicati<strong>on</strong> for screening. Screening is not recommended for all patients (Grade E). Certain<br />

risk factors associated with a higher incidence of urologic abnormalities have been identified.<br />

Screening is recommended for patients with: (1) gross hematuria during a UTI episode; (2)<br />

obstructive symptoms; (3) clinical impressi<strong>on</strong> of persistent infecti<strong>on</strong>; (4) infecti<strong>on</strong> with ureasplitting<br />

bacteria; (5) history of pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis; (6) history of or symptoms suggestive of<br />

urolithiasis; (7), history of childhood UTI; <strong>and</strong> (8) elevated serum creatinine (Grade C).<br />

4.2 Choice of screening procedure. A combinati<strong>on</strong> of a renal ultrasound <strong>and</strong> a plain abdominal<br />

radiograph is recommended (Grade B). Patients with anatomical abnormalities should he referred<br />

to a specialist (nephrologist or urologist) for fur<strong>the</strong>r evaluati<strong>on</strong> (Grade C).


5. Prophylaxis in post-menopausal women<br />

Use of estriol. In post-menopausal women, applicati<strong>on</strong> of intra-vaginal estriol cream applied<br />

<strong>on</strong>ce each night for two weeks followed by twice-weekly applicati<strong>on</strong>s for 8 m<strong>on</strong>ths is<br />

recommended (Grade A).<br />

VI. COMPLICATED URINARY TRACT INFECTION<br />

1. Definiti<strong>on</strong><br />

Complicated UTI is significant bacteriuria, which occurs in <strong>the</strong> setting of functi<strong>on</strong>al or<br />

anatomic abnormalities of <strong>the</strong> urinary tract or kidneys. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s that define complicated<br />

UTI include <strong>the</strong> following (Rubin 1992): (a) <strong>the</strong> presence of an indwelling urinary ca<strong>the</strong>ter or use<br />

of intermittent ca<strong>the</strong>terizati<strong>on</strong>; (b) incomplete emptying of <strong>the</strong> bladder with more than 100 ml of<br />

urine retained postvoiding; (c) obstructive uropathy due to obstructi<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> bladder outlet, a<br />

calculus or o<strong>the</strong>r causes; (d) vesicoureteral reflux or o<strong>the</strong>r forms of urologic abnormalities<br />

including surgically created abnormalities; (e) azotemia due to intrinsic renal disease; <strong>and</strong> (f)<br />

renal transplantati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r authors (R<strong>on</strong>ald & Harding 1997, Williams 1996, Stamm <strong>and</strong> Hoot<strong>on</strong> 1993, Nickel<br />

1990) have broadened <strong>the</strong> definiti<strong>on</strong> to include UTI in patients with metabolic, horm<strong>on</strong>al or<br />

immunologic abnormalities, such as diabetes, impaired host resp<strong>on</strong>ses <strong>and</strong> UTI caused by<br />

pathogens, which are ei<strong>the</strong>r unusual or resistant to antibiotics. In additi<strong>on</strong>, UTI in males is<br />

generally c<strong>on</strong>sidered complicated except in young males presenting exclusively with<br />

symptomatic lower UTI (see Secti<strong>on</strong> VII.1.1).<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> cut-off for significant bacteriuria in complicated UTI has been set at 100,000 cfu/ml<br />

(Rubin 1992). However in certain clinical situati<strong>on</strong>s, low-level bacteriuria or counts


Table 6. Pathogens identified in complicated UTI<br />

Type of Complicated UTI Pathogens Reference<br />

Ca<strong>the</strong>ter-associated UTI<br />

Short-term (1 week) Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter<br />

Usually polymicrobial, E. Coli, P. aeruginosa, P. mirabilis,<br />

Providencia stuartii, Morganella morgagnii, Citrobacter,<br />

Enterococcus, C<strong>and</strong>ida sp.<br />

Anatomic abnormalities E. coli, Klebsiella pneum<strong>on</strong>iae (37%.), P. aeruginosa, Proteus<br />

mirabilis<br />

UTI in Diabetics E. coli, Klebsiella pneum<strong>on</strong>iae, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter,<br />

Enterococcus, P. aeruginosa, C<strong>and</strong>ida sp.<br />

Renal Transplant Recipients E. coil (29-61%), Proteus mirabilis <strong>and</strong> Klebsiella pneum<strong>on</strong>iae<br />

(30%), Gram positive cocci (20%), Enterobacter, Enterococci,<br />

Serratia, Acinetobacter, Citrobacter, Pseudom<strong>on</strong>as aeruginosa<br />

Neutropenic Patients Gram negative bacilli spec. Pseudom<strong>on</strong>as aeruginosa,<br />

Staphylococcus aureus, C<strong>and</strong>ida<br />

UTI in AIDS E. coli Enterobacter, Klebsiella pneum<strong>on</strong>iae, Pseudom<strong>on</strong>as,<br />

Enterococci, Staphylococcus aureus, Cytomegalovirus,<br />

Adenovirus, Toxoplasma, Pneumocystis carinii,<br />

Blastomyces dermatidis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis<br />

Table 7. Antimicrobial regimens that may be used as empiric <strong>the</strong>rapy for complicated UTI<br />

Ousl<strong>and</strong>er<br />

1987<br />

Childs 1993<br />

Patters<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Andriole<br />

1997<br />

Schmaldienst<br />

<strong>and</strong> Horl 1997<br />

Korzeniowski<br />

1991<br />

Sharifi <strong>and</strong><br />

Lee 1997<br />

Antibiotic Regimen<br />

Oral Regimen Parenteral Regimen<br />

Ciprofloxacin 250 mg po q 12 hrs x 14 days Ampicillin 1 gm q 6hrs IV + gentamicin 3 mg/kg/day OD IV<br />

Norfloxacin 400 mg BID po x 14 days<br />

Ceftazidime 1-2 gm q 8hrs IV<br />

Ofloxacin 200 mg q 12hrs po x 14 days<br />

Ceftriax<strong>on</strong>e 1-2 gm OD IV<br />

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 160/800 q 12hrs po Ciprofloxacin 200-400 mg q 12hrs IV<br />

x 10 days<br />

Imipenem-cilastatin 250-500 mg q 6-8 hrs IV<br />

Ofloxacin 200-400 mg q 12hrs IV<br />

2.5 Fur<strong>the</strong>r work-up to identify <strong>and</strong> correct <strong>the</strong> anatomical, functi<strong>on</strong>al or metabolic abnormality is<br />

indicated. Referral to <strong>the</strong> appropriate specialists, such as infectious diseases, nephrology or<br />

urology should be made as necessary (Grade C).<br />

2.6 Urine culture should he repeated <strong>on</strong>e to two weeks after completi<strong>on</strong> of medicati<strong>on</strong>s (Grade<br />

C). Significant bacteriuria post-treatment needs appropriate referral (Grade C).<br />

3. Special issues<br />

3.1 Ca<strong>the</strong>ter-associated UTI. Ca<strong>the</strong>terized patients with significant bacteriuria of > 100 cfu/ml of<br />

urine, who develop fever or o<strong>the</strong>r signs of bacteremia should be treated as complicated UTI<br />

(Grade B). Ca<strong>the</strong>terized patients with no risk factors who are o<strong>the</strong>rwise asymptomatic need not he<br />

treated with antibiotics (Grade E). Whenever possible, <strong>the</strong> indwelling ca<strong>the</strong>ter should be removed<br />

to help eradicate <strong>the</strong> bacteriuria (Grade A).<br />

3.2 Patients with diabetes. Acute uncomplicated cystitis in diabetic patients requires pre-<br />

treatment urine gram stain <strong>and</strong> culture <strong>and</strong> a post-treatment urine culture. At least 7-14 days of<br />

oral antibiotics is recommended (Grade C).


Diabetic patients who present with UTI <strong>and</strong> signs of sepsis should be hospitalized.<br />

Failure to resp<strong>on</strong>d to appropriate <strong>the</strong>rapy within 48 to 72 hours warrants a plain abdominal<br />

radiograph <strong>and</strong> a renal ultrasound (Grade C).<br />

3.3. Renal transplant patients. UTI, which develop in <strong>the</strong> first three m<strong>on</strong>ths post-operatively, as<br />

well as o<strong>the</strong>r UTIs which develop later with signs of pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis or sepsis, should be treated<br />

with parenteral broad-spectrum antibiotics until <strong>the</strong> urine cultures become negative. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>rapy can<br />

he switched to oral agents according to <strong>the</strong> culture <strong>and</strong> sensitivity results <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinued to<br />

complete 4-6 weeks (Grade C).<br />

Renal transplant patients who develop UTI within <strong>the</strong> first three m<strong>on</strong>ths post-transplant<br />

with no evidence of sepsis may be treated as outpatients with oral antibiotics for more than 14<br />

days (Grade C).<br />

For renal transplant patients, prophylaxis with TMP/SMX (160/ 1800 mg) twice daily<br />

during <strong>the</strong> hospitalizati<strong>on</strong> period immediately post-surgery, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>on</strong>ce daily up<strong>on</strong> discharge is<br />

recommended (Grade A). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> actual dose of TMP/SMX should be adjusted to <strong>the</strong> renal functi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Durati<strong>on</strong> of prophylaxis should be given for 3 m<strong>on</strong>ths (Grade C).<br />

3.4 Patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). In additi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> general<br />

management of complicated UTI, patients with AIDS <strong>and</strong> UTI should be evaluated to include<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r n<strong>on</strong>-bacterial pathogens if clinically suspected <strong>and</strong> should be referred to an appropriate<br />

specialist (Grade C).<br />

VII. URINARY TRACT INFECTION IN MALES<br />

A. UNCOMPLICATED UTI IN YOUNG MALES<br />

1. Definiti<strong>on</strong><br />

Urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> in males is generally c<strong>on</strong>sidered complicated. However, <strong>the</strong> first<br />

episode of symptomatic lower urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> occurring in a young (15-40 years old)<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rwise healthy sexually active male with no clinical or historical evidence of a structural or<br />

functi<strong>on</strong>al urologic abnormality is c<strong>on</strong>sidered as uncomplicated UTI.<br />

2. <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

Significant pyuria in men is defined as > 10 wbc/mm 3 or 5 wbc/hpf in a clean catch<br />

midstream urine specimen. This shows good correlati<strong>on</strong> with bladder bacteriuria <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> growth<br />

of > 1000 col<strong>on</strong>ies of <strong>on</strong>e predominant species/ ml of urine <strong>and</strong> best differentiate sterile from<br />

infected bladder urine (Grade C).<br />

3. Recommended diagnostic work-up<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> recommended diagnostic work-up includes a urinalysis <strong>and</strong> urine culture (Grade C).<br />

Routine urologic evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> use of imaging procedures are not recommended (Grade C).<br />

4. Treatment<br />

TMP/SMX or a fluoroquinol<strong>on</strong>e given for seven days is recommended (Grade C).<br />

Ampicillin, sulf<strong>on</strong>amides, tetracyclines <strong>and</strong> cephalothin are not recommended because of<br />

increasing resistance (Grade C). Choice of antibiotics should he guided by <strong>the</strong> prevailing<br />

resistance <strong>and</strong> sensitivity patterns in <strong>the</strong> community (Grade C).


B. PROSTATITIS*<br />

(*Note: Current clinical practice guidelines include <strong>on</strong>ly acute <strong>and</strong> chr<strong>on</strong>ic bacterial prostatitis <strong>and</strong> not n<strong>on</strong>-bacterial<br />

prostatitis <strong>and</strong> prostatodynia syndromes.<br />

*In 1995, <strong>the</strong> Nati<strong>on</strong>al Institutes of Health C<strong>on</strong>sensus C<strong>on</strong>ference <strong>on</strong> Prostatitis proposed <strong>the</strong> following classificati<strong>on</strong><br />

of prostatitis syndromes: Category 1, Acute Bacterial Prostatitis; Category 2, Chr<strong>on</strong>ic Bacterial Prostatitis;<br />

Category 3, Chr<strong>on</strong>ic Pelvic Pain Syndromes; a. Inflammatory b. N<strong>on</strong>-inflammatory <strong>and</strong> Category 4, Asymptomatic<br />

Prostatitis)<br />

1. Definiti<strong>on</strong><br />

1.1 Acute bacterial prostatitis. Acute prostate is defined as a febrile illness with abrupt <strong>on</strong>set<br />

marked by chills, low back <strong>and</strong> perineal pain, generalized malaise <strong>and</strong> prostrati<strong>on</strong>. Irritative<br />

voiding symptoms including dysuria, urgency, frequency <strong>and</strong> nocturia are characteristic. Rectal<br />

examinati<strong>on</strong> reveals a markedly tender prostate that is swollen, firm <strong>and</strong> warm.<br />

1.2. Chr<strong>on</strong>ic bacterial prostatitis.<br />

Chr<strong>on</strong>ic bacterial prostatitis is a more subtle illness than acute prostatitis typified by<br />

relapsing or recurrent UTI caused by persistence of <strong>the</strong> pathogen in <strong>the</strong> prostate despite courses of<br />

antibacterial <strong>the</strong>rapy. Symptoms c<strong>on</strong>sist of varying degrees of irritative voiding <strong>and</strong> pain<br />

perceived in various sites - suprapubic, perineal, low back, scrotal, penile or even <strong>the</strong> inner thighs.<br />

Rectal examinati<strong>on</strong> discloses no specific or characteristic finding.<br />

1.3. <strong>Diagnosis</strong>. In chr<strong>on</strong>ic bacterial prostatitis, direct microscopic examinati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> expressed<br />

prostatic secreti<strong>on</strong>s (EPS) identifies significant prostatic inflammati<strong>on</strong> at > 10 wbc/hpf. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

presence of lipid-laden macrophages is more prostate specific <strong>and</strong> streng<strong>the</strong>ns <strong>the</strong> diagnosis.<br />

<strong>Diagnosis</strong> can be fur<strong>the</strong>r c<strong>on</strong>firmed by doing <strong>the</strong> triple voided urine test. In this<br />

examinati<strong>on</strong>, prostatitis can <strong>on</strong>ly be diagnosed if <strong>the</strong> specimen is free of WBC. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> diagnosis of<br />

prostatic infecti<strong>on</strong> is c<strong>on</strong>firmed when <strong>the</strong> quantitative bacterial col<strong>on</strong>y counts of EPS <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> next<br />

5 to 10 ml of urine (VB3) significantly exceed those of <strong>the</strong> urethral (VBI) <strong>and</strong> bladder (VB2)<br />

specimens. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> col<strong>on</strong>y count of <strong>the</strong> EPS <strong>and</strong> VB3 should exceed <strong>the</strong> VBI by at least 1 logarithm<br />

(Grade C).<br />

2. Treatment<br />

2.1 For acute prostatitis, empiric treatment with TMP/SMX (160/ 800 mg) or an oral<br />

fluoroquinol<strong>on</strong>e may be started until culture <strong>and</strong> sensitivity results are known. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> course of<br />

treatment should extend to at least 30 days to help prevent <strong>the</strong> development of chr<strong>on</strong>ic prostatitis<br />

(Grade C). Seriously ill patients require hospitalizati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> parenteral antimicrobial <strong>the</strong>rapy, such<br />

as an aminoglycoside-penicillin derivative combinati<strong>on</strong> or fluoroquinol<strong>on</strong>es (Grade C). When<br />

complicati<strong>on</strong>s of urinary retenti<strong>on</strong> or <strong>the</strong> development of a prostatic abscess occurs, referral to an<br />

urologist is str<strong>on</strong>gly recommended (Grade C).<br />

2.2 For chr<strong>on</strong>ic bacterial prostatitis, TMP/SMX or fluoroquinol<strong>on</strong>es are indicated for two to three<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ths (Grade C).<br />

2.3 Men with recalcitrant chr<strong>on</strong>ic bacterial prostatitis can be treated with radical transurethral<br />

resecti<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> prostate. Symptomatic relief can he achieved with Sitz baths, anti-inflammatory<br />

agents <strong>and</strong> prostatic massage <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r supportive measures (Grade C).


L<strong>on</strong>g-term, low-dose suppressive <strong>the</strong>rapy may he required for patients who do not<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>d to full dose treatment. TMP/SMX 80mg /400mg <strong>on</strong>ce daily is recommended (Grade C).<br />

VIII. PREVENTION OF CATHETER-ASSOCIATED URINARY TRACT<br />

INFECTION<br />

1. Pers<strong>on</strong>nel<br />

1.1 Only pers<strong>on</strong>s trained in correct aseptic techniques of ca<strong>the</strong>ter inserti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> care should h<strong>and</strong>le<br />

urinary ca<strong>the</strong>ters (Grade B).<br />

1.2. H<strong>and</strong> washing should be d<strong>on</strong>e immediately before <strong>and</strong> after ca<strong>the</strong>ter inserti<strong>on</strong> or care (Grade<br />

C).<br />

2. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> ca<strong>the</strong>ter<br />

2.1. Avoid unnecessary ca<strong>the</strong>ter use (Grade C).<br />

2.2. Limit ca<strong>the</strong>ter use to carefully selected patients (Grade C). Routine ca<strong>the</strong>terizati<strong>on</strong> during<br />

labor or immediately post-partum for collecti<strong>on</strong> of urine sample is not recommended (Grade C).<br />

2.3. Ca<strong>the</strong>ters should be inserted using aseptic technique <strong>and</strong> sterile equipment (Grade A).<br />

2.4. Maintain a sterile, closed ca<strong>the</strong>ter system at all times. Open drainage is unacceptable (Grade<br />

D).<br />

2.5. Urine specimens should he obtained aseptically without opening <strong>the</strong> ca<strong>the</strong>ter-collecti<strong>on</strong><br />

juncti<strong>on</strong> (Grade B).<br />

2.6. Maintain unobstructed <strong>and</strong> adequate urine flow at all times (Grade B).<br />

2.7 Do not change ca<strong>the</strong>ters at arbitrary fixed intervals (Grade C).<br />

2.8 Remove <strong>the</strong> urinary ca<strong>the</strong>ter as so<strong>on</strong> as possible (Grade A).<br />

3. Methods to prevent endogenous infecti<strong>on</strong><br />

3.1 Daily meatal care is not recommended (Grade E).<br />

4. Methods to prevent exogenous infecti<strong>on</strong><br />

4.1 Irrigati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> bladder with antimicrobial agents is not useful (Grade D)<br />

4.2 Instillati<strong>on</strong> of disinfectants into <strong>the</strong> bag <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> use of antireflux valves <strong>and</strong> vents are not<br />

helpful.<br />

4.3 Segregate infected from uninfected ca<strong>the</strong>terized patients (Grade C).<br />

5. Bacteriologic m<strong>on</strong>itoring <strong>and</strong> treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria to prevent complicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

(Sec<strong>on</strong>dary preventi<strong>on</strong>).


5.1 Regular bacteriologic m<strong>on</strong>itoring of ca<strong>the</strong>terized patients is not recommended (Grade D).<br />

5.2 Use of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in ca<strong>the</strong>terized patients is discouraged (Grade C).<br />

5.3 Patients at high-risk for complicati<strong>on</strong>s of ca<strong>the</strong>ter-associated bacteriuria, such renal transplant<br />

<strong>and</strong> granulocytopenic patients may benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis (Grade B).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Abrutyn E, Mossey J, Berlin JA, Boscia J, Levis<strong>on</strong> M, Pitsakis P, Kaye D. 1994. Does asymptomatic bacteriuria predict mortality <strong>and</strong><br />

does antimicrobial treatment mortality <strong>and</strong> does antimicrobial treatment reduce mortality in elderly ambulatory women. Ann<br />

Intern Med 120:827-833.<br />

Abyad A. 1991. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: urinalysis vs. urine culture. J Family <str<strong>on</strong>g>Practice</str<strong>on</strong>g> 33:471-474.<br />

Adels<strong>on</strong> MD, Graves WL, Osborne NG. 1992. Treatment of urinary infecti<strong>on</strong>s in pregnancy using single versus 10-day dosing<br />

[abstract]. J Natl Med Assoc 84:73-75.<br />

Alej<strong>and</strong>ria MM, Manapat BD. 1998. Three-day versus c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al antibiotic regimen for uncomplicated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s in<br />

women: a meta-analysis of r<strong>and</strong>omized trials. PJMID 27:41-48.<br />

Andriole VT, Patters<strong>on</strong> TF. 1991. Epidemiology, natural history <strong>and</strong> management of urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s in pregnancy. Med Clin<br />

North Am 75:359-373.<br />

Andriole VT. 1975. Hospital acquired urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> indwelling ca<strong>the</strong>ter. 1975.<br />

Urol Clin North Am 2:451-469.<br />

Angel JL, O’Brien WF, Finas MA, Morales WJ, Lake M, Knuppel RA. 1990. Acute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis in pregnancy: a prospective study<br />

<strong>on</strong> oral versus intravenous antibiotic <strong>the</strong>rapy. Obstet Gynecol 76:28-32.<br />

Aslaksen A. 1990. Intravenous urography vs. ultras<strong>on</strong>ography in <strong>the</strong> evaluati<strong>on</strong> of women with recurrent urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>. Sc<strong>and</strong><br />

J of Primary Health Care 8:85-9.<br />

Bachman JW, Heise RH, Naess<strong>on</strong>s JM, Timmerman MG. 1993. A study of various tests to detect asymptomatic urinary tract<br />

infecti<strong>on</strong>s in an obstetric populati<strong>on</strong>. JAMA 270:1971-1974.<br />

Bailey RR. 1994. Durati<strong>on</strong> of antimicrobial treatment <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> use of drug combinati<strong>on</strong>s for <strong>the</strong> treatment of uncomplicated acute<br />

pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis. Infecti<strong>on</strong> 22 Suppl 1:S50-52.<br />

Bailey RR. 1992. Quinol<strong>on</strong>es in <strong>the</strong> treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Int J Antimicrobial Agents 2:19-28.<br />

Bailey RR, Lynn KL, Robs<strong>on</strong> RA, Peddie BA, Smith A. 1992. Comparis<strong>on</strong> of ciprofloxacin with netilmicin for <strong>the</strong> treatment of acute<br />

pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis. NZ Med J 105:102-103.<br />

Bailey RR, Lynn KL, Robs<strong>on</strong> RA, Peddie BA, Smith A. 1986. Comparis<strong>on</strong> of netilmicin with ceftriax<strong>on</strong>efor <strong>the</strong> treatment of severe or<br />

complicated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. NZ Med J 99:459-461.<br />

Bailey RR, Peddie BA. 1987. Treatment of acute urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> in women. Ann Intern Med 107:430.<br />

Barlett RC, Galen RS. 1983. Predictive value of urine culture. Am J Clin Pathol.79:756-757.<br />

Bastable JR, Peel RN, Birch DM, Richards B. 1977. C<strong>on</strong>tinuous irrigati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> bladder after prostatectomy: Its effect <strong>on</strong> postprostatectomy<br />

infecti<strong>on</strong> [abstract]. Br J Urol 49:689-693.<br />

Belitsky P, Lann<strong>on</strong> SG, McD<strong>on</strong>ald AS, Cohen AD, Marie TJ, Houlihan P, Whalen A. 1982. Urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s after kidney<br />

transplantati<strong>on</strong>. Transplant Proc 14:696-699.<br />

Berger<strong>on</strong> MG. 1979. Treatment of pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis in adults. Med Clin North Am 79:619-649.<br />

Boerama JBJ, Domen WBM, Branolte JH. 1985. Comparative efficacy <strong>and</strong> safety of ciprofloxacin <strong>and</strong> co-trimoxazole in <strong>the</strong> treatment<br />

of patients with complicated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s [abstract]. Proceeding of <strong>the</strong> 14 th Internati<strong>on</strong>al C<strong>on</strong>gress of Chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy.<br />

Kyoto, Japan. S50-7.<br />

Br<strong>on</strong>sema DA, Adams JR, Pallares R, Wenzel RP. 1993. Secular trends in rates <strong>and</strong> etiology of nosocomial urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s in<br />

women. QJ Med. 81:811-20.<br />

Brumfitt W. 1991 Comparative trial of norfloxacin <strong>and</strong> macrocrystalline nitrofuranti<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract<br />

infecti<strong>on</strong>s in women. QJ Med 81:811-20.<br />

Brumfitt W. 1990 Comparative study of cephradine <strong>and</strong> amoxicillin-clavulanate in <strong>the</strong> treatment of recurrent urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Antimicrob Agents Chemo<strong>the</strong>r 34:1803-1805.<br />

Brumfitt W. 1995. A comparative trial of low dose cefaclor <strong>and</strong> macroxyrstalline nitrofuranti<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> preventi<strong>on</strong> of recurrent urinary<br />

tract infecti<strong>on</strong>. Infecti<strong>on</strong> 23:98-102.<br />

Burke JP, Garibaldi RA. Britt MR, Jacobs<strong>on</strong> JA. C<strong>on</strong>ti M, Alling DW. 1981. Preventi<strong>on</strong> of ca<strong>the</strong>ter associated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Efficacy of daily meatal care regimens. Am J Med 70:655-658.<br />

Burke JP, Jacobs<strong>on</strong> JA, Garibaldi RA, C<strong>on</strong>ti MT, Alling DW. 1983. Evaluati<strong>on</strong> of daily meatal care with poly-antibiotic ointment in<br />

preventi<strong>on</strong> of urinary ca<strong>the</strong>ter-associated bacteriuria [abstract]. J Urol 129:331-334.<br />

Calder<strong>on</strong> JE, Arred<strong>on</strong>do GJL, Olvera SJ, Echaniz AG, C<strong>on</strong>de GC, Hern<strong>and</strong>ez NP. 1989. Acute urethritis during pregnancy [abstract].<br />

Gynecol Obstet Max 57:57-63.<br />

Carlos CC. 1997. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance program progress report.<br />

Carls<strong>on</strong> KJ, Mulley AG. 1985. Management of acute dysuria. A decisi<strong>on</strong>-analysis model of alternative strategies. Ann Intern Med<br />

102:244-249.<br />

Classen DC, Larsen RA, Burke JP, Allin DW, Stevens LE. 1991. Daily meatal care for preventi<strong>on</strong> of ca<strong>the</strong>ter-associated bacteriuria:<br />

Results using frequent applicati<strong>on</strong>s of polyantibiotic cream [abstract]. Infect C<strong>on</strong>trol Hosp Epidemiol 12:57-162.<br />

Cox CE. 1992. A comparis<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> safety <strong>and</strong> efficacy of lomefloxacin <strong>and</strong> ciprofloxacin in <strong>the</strong> treatment of complicated or recurrent<br />

urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Am J Med 92 Suppl n4A:835-86S.<br />

Cox CE. 1980. Ofloxacin in <strong>the</strong> management of complicated UTI including prostatitis. Am J Med Suppl 6C:61.<br />

Cunningham FG, Morris GE, et al. 1975. Acute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis of pregnancy: A clinical review. Obstet Cynecol 12:112.


Cuvelier R, Pirs<strong>on</strong> Y, Alex<strong>and</strong>re GRJ, van Ypersele de Strihou C. 1985. Late urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> after transplantati<strong>on</strong>: Prevalence,<br />

predispositi<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> morbidity. Nephr<strong>on</strong> 40:76-78.<br />

Daifuki R, Stamm WE. 1984. Associati<strong>on</strong> of rectal <strong>and</strong> urethral col<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong> with urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> in patients with indwelling<br />

ca<strong>the</strong>ters. JAMA 252:2028-2030.<br />

Davies AJ, Desai HN, Turt<strong>on</strong> S, Dyas A. 1987. Does instillati<strong>on</strong> of chlorhexidine into <strong>the</strong> bladder of ca<strong>the</strong>rized geriatric patients help<br />

reduce bacteriuria. J Hosp Infect 9:72-75.<br />

De Guzman V, Nicolas C, Naidas O. 1998. Efficacy of single dose versus three days of antibiotics for uncomplicated urinary tract<br />

infecti<strong>on</strong>: A meta-analysis of r<strong>and</strong>omized trials. In press.<br />

Dytan AT, Chua JA. 1998. Study of uncomplicated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> [abstract] PJMID 27:S15.<br />

Epstein SE. 1985. Cost-effective applicati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Centers for Disease C<strong>on</strong>trol <str<strong>on</strong>g>Guideline</str<strong>on</strong>g> for Preventi<strong>on</strong> of ca<strong>the</strong>ter-associated urinary<br />

tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s [abstract]. Am Infect C<strong>on</strong>trol 13:272-275.<br />

Fairchild TN 1982. Radiographic studies for women with recurrent urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. J Urol 128:344-345.<br />

Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH. 1996 <str<strong>on</strong>g>Clinical</str<strong>on</strong>g> Epidemiology: <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Essentials. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.<br />

Forl<strong>and</strong> M. 1993. Urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>: How has its management changed? Post Grad Med 93:71-86.<br />

Forl<strong>and</strong> M, Thomas V, Shelokov A. 1997. Urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s in patients with diabetes mellitus: Studies <strong>on</strong> antibody coating of<br />

bacteria. JAMA 238:1924-1926.<br />

Fox BC, Sollinger HW, Belzer FO, Maki DG. 1990. Prospective r<strong>and</strong>omized double-blind study of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for<br />

prophylaxis of infecti<strong>on</strong> in renal transplantati<strong>on</strong>: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Clinical</str<strong>on</strong>g> efficacy, absorpti<strong>on</strong> of trimethoprin-sulfa-methoxazole, effects <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

microflora <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost-benefit of prophylaxis. Am J Med 89:255-274.<br />

Fox CE, Tack KJ. 1988. Safety <strong>and</strong> efficacy of ofloxacin vs. trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for complicated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Rev Infect Dis 10 Suppl 1:S175.<br />

Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Dickman ML, Smith CB. 1974. Factors predisposing to bacteriuria during indwelling urethral ca<strong>the</strong>terizati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

N Eng J Med 291:215-219.<br />

Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Britt MR, Miller WA, Smith CB. 1980. Meatal col<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> ca<strong>the</strong>ter associated bacteriuria. N Engl J<br />

Med 303:316-318.<br />

Gillespie WA, Simps<strong>on</strong> RA, J<strong>on</strong>es JE, Nashef L, Teasdale C, Speller DC. 1983. Does <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong> of disinfectant to urine drainage<br />

bags prevent infecti<strong>on</strong> in ca<strong>the</strong>terized patients? Lancet 1:1037-1039.<br />

Gilstrap LC III, Cunningham FG, Whalley PJ. 1981.Acute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis in pregnancy: An anterospective study: Obstet Gynecol<br />

57:409-413.<br />

Golan A, Wexler S, Amit A, Gord<strong>on</strong> D, David M. 1989. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in normal <strong>and</strong> high risk pregnancy. Eur J Obstet<br />

Gyne Reproductive Biol 33:101-108.<br />

Guerra JG, Falc<strong>on</strong>i E, Palomino JC, et al. 1983. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Clinical</str<strong>on</strong>g> evaluati<strong>on</strong> of norfloxacin vs. cotrimoxazole in urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Eur J<br />

Clin Microbiol 2:260-265.<br />

Harding GKM, Nicolle LE, R<strong>on</strong>ald AR, Preiksaitis, JK Forward KR, Low DE, Cheang M. 1991. How l<strong>on</strong>g should ca<strong>the</strong>ter-acquired<br />

urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> in women be treated? A r<strong>and</strong>omized c<strong>on</strong>trolled study. Ann Intern Med 114:713-719.<br />

Harris RE. 1979. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> significance of eradicati<strong>on</strong> of bacteriuria during pregnancy. Obstet Gyne 53.<br />

Harris RE. 1984. Acute urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>and</strong> subsequent problems. Clin Obstet Gyne 27:8974-890.<br />

Harris RE, Gilstrap LG III. 1981. Cystitis during pregnancy: A distant clinical entity. Obstet Gyne 57:578.<br />

Harstein Al, Garber SB, Ward TT, J<strong>on</strong>es SR, Morthl<strong>and</strong> VH. 1981. Nosocomial urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>: A prospective evaluati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

108 ca<strong>the</strong>terized patients [abstract]. Infect C<strong>on</strong>trol 2:380-386.<br />

Hill JA, Devoe LD, Bryans IC. 1986. Frequency of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pre-eclampsia. Obstet Gyne 67:529-532.<br />

Hoot<strong>on</strong> TM, Stamm WE. 1997. <strong>Diagnosis</strong> <strong>and</strong> treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>. Infect Dis Clin North Am 11:551-<br />

581.<br />

Hoot<strong>on</strong> TM, Winter C, Tiu F, Stamm WE. 1995. R<strong>and</strong>omized comparative trial <strong>and</strong> cost analysis of 3-day antimicrobial regiments for<br />

treatment of acute cystitis in women JAMA 273:1:41-5.<br />

Huth TS, Burke JP, Larsen RA, Classen DC, Stevens LE. 1992. R<strong>and</strong>omized trial of meatal care with silver sulfadiazine cream for <strong>the</strong><br />

preventi<strong>on</strong> of ca<strong>the</strong>ter-associated bacteriuria. J Infect Dis 165:148.<br />

Israel RS, Lowenstein SR, Marx JA, et al. 1991. Management of acute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis in an emergency department observati<strong>on</strong> unit.<br />

Ann Emerg Med 20:253-257.<br />

Jernelius H,. Zbornik J, Bauer CA. 1988. One or three weeks treatment of acute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis? A double-blind comparis<strong>on</strong>, using a<br />

fixed combinati<strong>on</strong> of pivampicillin plus pivmecillinam. Acta Medica Sc<strong>and</strong> 223:469-477.<br />

Johns<strong>on</strong> JR, Ly<strong>on</strong>s MF, Pearce W, et al 1991. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>rapy for women hospitalized with acute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis: a r<strong>and</strong>omized trial of<br />

ampicillin vs trimethoprin-sulfamethoxazole for 14 days. J Infect Dis 163:325-330.<br />

Johns<strong>on</strong> JR, Vincent LM, Wang K, Roberts PL, Stamm WE. 1992. Renal ultras<strong>on</strong>ographic correlates of acute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis. Clin<br />

Infect Dis 14:15-22.<br />

Kanel KT, Kroboth FJ, Schwentker FN, Lecky JW. 1983. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> intravenous pyelogram in acute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis. Arch Intern Med<br />

148:2144-2148.<br />

Kass EH. 1956. Asymptomatic infecti<strong>on</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> urinary tract. Trans Assoc Am Phys 69:56-64.<br />

Keys TF, Maker MD, Segura JW. 1979. Bacteriuria during closed urinary drainage: an evaluati<strong>on</strong> of top-vented versus bag-vented<br />

systems J Urol 122:49-51.<br />

Kim ED, Schaeffer AJ. 1994. Antimicrobial <strong>the</strong>rapy for urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Seminars in Nephrology. 14:551-69.<br />

Komaroff AL. 1991. Acute dysuria in adult women. In: Panzer RJ, Black ER, Griner PF, editors Diagnostic strategies for comm<strong>on</strong><br />

medical problems. Philadelphia: Am College of Physicians p 239.<br />

Korzeniowski OM. 1991. Urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> impaired host. Med Clin North am 75:391-404.<br />

Kraft JK. 1977. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> natural history of symptomatic recurrent bacteriuria in women. Medicine 56:55-60.<br />

Kunin CM, Mc Cormack RC. 1966. Preventi<strong>on</strong> of ca<strong>the</strong>ter-induced urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> by sterile closed drainage. N Engl J Med<br />

274:1155-1162.<br />

Kunin CM. 1992. Editorial guidelines for <strong>the</strong> evaluati<strong>on</strong> of new anti-infective drugs for <strong>the</strong> treatment of urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Clin<br />

Infect Dis 15:1041-1044.<br />

Kunin CM. 1997. Detecti<strong>on</strong>, preventi<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> management of urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lea <strong>and</strong> Febiger.


Kunin C, White L, Hua Hua T. 1993. A re-assessment of <strong>the</strong> importance of ‘low count”bacteriuria in young women with acute urinary<br />

symptoms. Ann Intern Med 119:454-59.<br />

Lacks MS, Nacharin I, Edelstein P. 1992. Spectrum bias in <strong>the</strong> evaluati<strong>on</strong> of diagnostic test. Less<strong>on</strong>s from rapid dipstick test for<br />

urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>. Ann Intern Med 117:135-40.<br />

Leibovici L, Wysenbeck. 1991. Single-dose antibiotic treatment for symptomatic urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> in women: A meta-analysis of<br />

r<strong>and</strong>omized trials. J Med 285:43-57.<br />

Lenke RR, Van Dorsten JP, Schifrin BS. 1983. Pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis in pregnancy: a prospective r<strong>and</strong>omized trial to prevent recurrent<br />

disease evaluating suppressive <strong>the</strong>rapy with nitrofuranti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> close surveillance [abstract]. J Obstet Gynecol 146:953-957.<br />

Lipsky BA, Iret<strong>on</strong> R, et al 1987. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> diagnosis of bacteriuria in men: Specimen collecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> culture interpretati<strong>on</strong> J. Infect Dis<br />

155:847-54.<br />

Malinverni R, Glauser MP. 1988. Comparative studies of fluroquinol<strong>on</strong>es in <strong>the</strong> treatment of urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Rev Infect Dis<br />

10 suppl 1:S153-163.<br />

McHenry MC, Braun WE., Popowniak KL, Banowsky H, Deodhar SD. 1976. Septicemia in renal transplant recipients. Urol Clin<br />

North Am 3:647-666.<br />

McNicholas MM. 1991. Ultrasound of <strong>the</strong> pelvis <strong>and</strong> renal tract combined with a plain film of abdomen in young women with urinary<br />

tract infecti<strong>on</strong>: can it replace intravenous urography? Br J Radiol 64:221-4.<br />

Meares EM Jr. 1980. Prostatitis syndromes. New perspectives about old woes. J Urol 123.141- 147.<br />

Melekos MD. 1997. Post-intercourse versus daily ciprofloxacin prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s in premenopausal<br />

women. J J Urol 157:935-939.<br />

Mendoza MT, Liquete RR, Ona ET, Alano FA. 1997. Infecti<strong>on</strong>s in renal allograft recipients: a review of <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> experience. Int<br />

J Infect Dis 1:222-225.<br />

Mittendorf R, Williams MA, Kass EH. 1992 Preventi<strong>on</strong> of preterm delivery <strong>and</strong> low birth weight associated with asymptomatic<br />

bacteriuria. Clin Infect Dis 14:927-32.<br />

Mountokalakis T, Shounakis M, Tselentis J. 1985. Short-term versus prol<strong>on</strong>ged systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in patients treated with<br />

indwelling ca<strong>the</strong>ters. J Urol 134:506-508.<br />

Mout<strong>on</strong> J, Ajana F, Chidiac C. et al. 1992. A multicenter study of lomefloxacin <strong>and</strong> trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in <strong>the</strong> treatment of<br />

uncomplicated acute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis. Am J Med 92 suppl 4A:S87.<br />

Mushlin Al, Thorbury JR. 1989. Intravenous pyelography: <strong>the</strong> case against its routine use. Ann Intern Med 111:58-70.<br />

Myerowitz RL, Medeiros AA, O’Brien TF. 1972. Bacterial infecti<strong>on</strong> in renal homotransplant recipients: A study of fifty-three<br />

bacteremic episodes. Am J Med 53:308-314.<br />

Neu HG. 1992. Urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Am J Med 92 Suppl 4A:63S-70S.<br />

Nickel JC. 1990. Special c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> management of complicated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Internati<strong>on</strong>al C<strong>on</strong>gress <strong>and</strong><br />

Symposium Series: Management of Urinary tract Infecti<strong>on</strong>s. 85-95.<br />

Nicolle LE. 1997. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in <strong>the</strong> elderly. Infect Dis Clin North am 11:647-662.<br />

Nicolle LE, Mayhew JW, Bryan L. 1987 Prospective r<strong>and</strong>omized comparis<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong>rapy <strong>and</strong> no <strong>the</strong>rapy for asymptomatic bacteriuria<br />

in instituti<strong>on</strong>alized women. Am J Med 83:27-33.<br />

Nicolle LE, Bjorns<strong>on</strong> J, Harding GKM MacD<strong>on</strong>ell JA. 1983. Bacteriuria in elderly instituti<strong>on</strong>alized men. N Engl J Med 309:1420-<br />

1425.<br />

Nicolle LE. 1989. Prospective, r<strong>and</strong>omized, placebo-c<strong>on</strong>trolled trial of norfloxacin for <strong>the</strong> prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract<br />

infecti<strong>on</strong> in women. Antimirob Agents Chemo<strong>the</strong>r 33:1032-5.<br />

Norman DC, Yamamura R Yoshikawa TT. 1966. Pyuria: Its predictive value of asymptomatic bacteriuria in ambulatory elderly<br />

men J Urol 135:520-522.<br />

Norby SR 1994. Useful agents in <strong>the</strong> management of urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Int. J Antimicrob agents. 4:129-134.<br />

North DH, Speed JE, Weiner WB, Morris<strong>on</strong> JC. 1980. Correlati<strong>on</strong> of urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> with urinary screening at <strong>the</strong> first<br />

antepartum visit. J MSMA: 331-333.<br />

Ousl<strong>and</strong>er JG, Schapira M, Schnelle JF, et al. 1995. Does eradicating bacteriuria affect <strong>the</strong> severity of chr<strong>on</strong>ic urinary inc<strong>on</strong>tinence in<br />

nursing home residents? Ann Intern Med 122:749-754.<br />

Ousl<strong>and</strong>er JG, Greengold B, Chen S. 1987. Complicati<strong>on</strong>s of chr<strong>on</strong>ic indwelling urinary ca<strong>the</strong>ters am<strong>on</strong>g male nursing home patients:<br />

a prospective study J of Urol 138:1191-1195.<br />

Patters<strong>on</strong> JE, Andriole VT. 1997. Bacterial urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s in diabetes. Infect Dis North Am 7325:750.<br />

Pena AC, Mendoza MT, Go-Yap J. 1996. A r<strong>and</strong>omized open-label tolerance <strong>and</strong> efficacy study of oral tosufloxacin vs. oral<br />

trimethoprin-sulfamethoxazole forte in <strong>the</strong> treatment of patients with complicated <strong>and</strong> uncomplicated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s in<br />

<strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. PJ IM 34:123-128.<br />

Peters HJ. 1986. Comparis<strong>on</strong> of intravenous ciprofloxacin <strong>and</strong> mezlocillin in treatment of complicated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>. Eur J<br />

Clin Microbiol 5:253-255.<br />

Pewitt EB, Schaeffer AJ. 1997. Urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> in urology, including acute <strong>and</strong> chr<strong>on</strong>ic prostatitis, Infect Dis Clin North Am<br />

11.<br />

Pfau A. 1994. Effective postcoital quinol<strong>on</strong>e prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s in women. J Urol 152:136-138.<br />

Pins<strong>on</strong> AG, Philbrick JT, Lindbeck GH, Schorling JB. 1992. J Gen Intern Med 7:544-553.<br />

Pins<strong>on</strong> AG, Philbrick JT, Lindbeck GH, Schorling JB. 1994 ED management of acute pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis in women: a cohort study. Am J<br />

Emerg Med 12:271-278.<br />

Pittmann W, Mo<strong>on</strong> JO, Hamrick LC, Cox CE, Clark J. Childs Pizzutti D, Fredericks J, St. Clair P. 1993. r<strong>and</strong>omized double-blind trial<br />

of high <strong>and</strong> low dose fleroxacin versus norfloxacin for complicated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>. Am J Med 94 suppl 3A:101S-107S.<br />

Platt R. 1983. Quantitative definiti<strong>on</strong> of bacteriruria. Am J Med 75:44-52.<br />

Platt R, Murdock B, Polk BF, Rosner B. 1983 Reducti<strong>on</strong> of mortality associated with nosocomial urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>. Lancer<br />

1:893-897.<br />

Power RD. 1991. New directi<strong>on</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> diagnosis <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>rapy of urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164:1387-1389<br />

Raco MO, Barez MYC. 1998. Profile of community acquired urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s in Davao City PJMID 27:2:62-66<br />

Ramsey DE, Finch WT, Birtch AG. 1979 Urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> in kidney transplant recipients. Arch Surg 114:1022-1026.


Raz R, Stamm WE. 1993. A c<strong>on</strong>trolled trial of intravaginal estriol in postmenopausal women with recurrent urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. N<br />

Engl J Med 329:753-756.<br />

Reddy J, Campbell A. 1985. Bacteriuria in pregnancy. Aust & NZJ Obstet Gynecol 25:176-178.<br />

Reese RE, Betts RF, editors. 1997. Ca<strong>the</strong>ter-associated UTI. A Practical approach to infectious disease 4th ed. 12:506-511.<br />

Renoult E, Aouragh F, Mayeuz D, Hestin D, Lataste A, Hubert J, L’Hermite J, Kessler M. 1994. Factors influencing early urinary<br />

tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s in kidney transpl<strong>and</strong> recipients. Transplant Proc 26:2056-2058.<br />

Roberts FJ. 1986 Quantitative urine culture in patients with urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> bacteremia. Am J Clin Pathol 85:616-618.<br />

Romero R, Oyarzun E, Mazor M, Sirtori M, Hobbins JC, Bracken M. 1989. Meta-analysis of <strong>the</strong> relati<strong>on</strong>ship between asymptomatic<br />

bacteriuria <strong>and</strong> preterm delivery/low-birth weight. Obstet gynecol 73:576-582.<br />

R<strong>on</strong>ald AR, Harding GK. 1997 complicated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Infect Dis Clin North Am 11:583-592.<br />

R<strong>on</strong>ald AR, Pattullo ALS. 1991. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Natural History of Urinary infecti<strong>on</strong> in Adults. 75:299-312.<br />

Rose BD. 1997. Struvite st<strong>on</strong>es. UptoDate Inc.<br />

Rubin RH, Bean TR, Stamm WE. 1992. An approach to evaluating antibacterial agents in <strong>the</strong> treatment of urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>. Clin<br />

Infect Dis 14 suppl 2:S246:251.<br />

Rubin RH, Fang LST, Cosimi, AB, Herrin JT, Varga PA, Russell PS, Tolkiff-Rubin NE. 1979. Usefuleness of <strong>the</strong> antibody-coated<br />

bacteria assay in <strong>the</strong> management of urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> renal transplant patient. Transplantati<strong>on</strong> 27:18-20.<br />

Rubin RH, Shapiro ED, Andriole VT, Davis RJ, Stamm WE. 1992. General guidelines for <strong>the</strong> evaluati<strong>on</strong> of new anti-infective drugs<br />

for <strong>the</strong> treatment of urinary infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Clin Infect Dis 15 suppl 1:S216-27.<br />

Rubin RH, Beam TR Jr, Stamm WE. 1992. An approach to evaluating antibacterial agents in <strong>the</strong> treatment of urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Clin Infect Dis 14 Suppl 2;S246-251.<br />

Rubin RH Shapiro ED <strong>and</strong>riole VT et al 1992 evaluati<strong>on</strong> of new anti-infective drugs for <strong>the</strong> treatment of urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>. Clin<br />

Infect Dis 15 Suppl 1:S216-27.<br />

Rubin RH, Wolfs<strong>on</strong> JS, Cosimi AB, Tolkoff- Rubin NE. 1981. Infecti<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> renal transplant recipient. Am J Med 70:405-411.<br />

Sabbaj J, Hoagl<strong>and</strong> VL, Shih WJ. 1985. Multiclinic comparative study of norfloxacin <strong>and</strong> timethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment<br />

of urinary infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Antimicrob Agents Chemo<strong>the</strong>r 27:297-301.<br />

Safrin S, Siegel D, Black D. 1988. Pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis in adult women: inpatient vs outpatient <strong>the</strong>rapy. Am J Med 85:793-798.<br />

S<strong>and</strong>berg T, Englund G. Lincoln, et al. 1990. R<strong>and</strong>omized double-blind study of norfloxacin <strong>and</strong> cefadroxil in <strong>the</strong> treatment of acute<br />

pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 9:317-323.<br />

Sanford J. 1964. Hospital acquired urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>. Ann Int Med 60:903-913.<br />

Schaberg DR, Haley RW, Highsmith AK, Anders<strong>on</strong> RL, Mcgowan JE. 1980. Nosocomial bacteriuria. A prospective study of case<br />

clustering <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial resistance. Ann Intern Med 93:420-424.<br />

Schmaldienst S, Horl WH. 1997. Bacterial infecti<strong>on</strong>s after renal transplantati<strong>on</strong>. Nephr<strong>on</strong> 75: 140-153.<br />

Sharifi R, Lee M. 1997. Urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s in HIV infected men Infect. Urol 10:24-25.<br />

Smaill F. 1998 Antibiotic vs no treatment for symptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Cochrane Review. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Cochrane Library (2):1-<br />

10.<br />

Spencer J, Lindsell D, Mastorakou L. 1990. Ultras<strong>on</strong>ography compared with intravenous urography in investigati<strong>on</strong> of urinary tract<br />

infecti<strong>on</strong> in adults. BMJ 301:221-224.<br />

Stamey TA. 1977. Prophylactic efficacy of nitrofurantoin macrocrystals <strong>and</strong> trimethoprin-sulfamethoxazole in urinary infecti<strong>on</strong>s:<br />

Biologic effects <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> vaginal <strong>and</strong> rectal flora. N Engl J Med 296:780-783.<br />

Stamm WE, Hoot<strong>on</strong>TM. 1993. Management of urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> in adults. N Engl J Med 319:1328-1334.Stamm WE, Counts<br />

GW, Running KR, et al. 1982. <strong>Diagnosis</strong> of c`oliform infecti<strong>on</strong> in acutely dysuric women. N Engl J Med 307-463.<br />

Stamm WE. 1980. Antimicrobial prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s: a double-blind, placebo-c<strong>on</strong>trolled trial. Ann Intern<br />

Med 92:770-5.<br />

Stamm WE, Mckevitt M, Counts GW. 1987. Acute renal infecti<strong>on</strong> in women: treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or<br />

ampicillin for two or six weeks; a r<strong>and</strong>omized trial. Ann Intern Med 106:341-345.<br />

Stansfeld JM. 1962. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> measurement <strong>and</strong> meaning of pyuria. Arch Dis Child 37:257-6.<br />

Staplet<strong>on</strong> A. 1990. Postcoital antimicrobial prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>: a r<strong>and</strong>omized double-blind, placeboc<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />

trial. JAMA 264:703-6.<br />

Stark RP, Maki DG. 1984. Bacteriuria in <strong>the</strong> ca<strong>the</strong>terized patient: What quantitative level of bacteriuria is relevant? N Engl J Med<br />

311:560-564.<br />

Steere AC, Mallis<strong>on</strong> GF. 1975. H<strong>and</strong>washing practices for <strong>the</strong> preventi<strong>on</strong> of nosocomial infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Ann Intern Med 83:683-90.<br />

Stenqvist K, Dahlen-Nilss<strong>on</strong> I, Lichin-Jans<strong>on</strong> G. 1989. Bacteriuria in pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 129:372.<br />

Stuby U, Kaise W, Grafinger P, Beisenbach, Zazgornik J. 1989. Urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> after renal transplantati<strong>on</strong> under c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al<br />

<strong>the</strong>rapy <strong>and</strong> cyclosporine. Transplant Proc 21:2110-2111.<br />

Sweet DE, Goodpasture HC, Holl K, Smart S, Alex<strong>and</strong>er H, Hedari A. 1985. Evaluati<strong>on</strong> of H202 prophylaxis of bacteriuria in patients<br />

with l<strong>on</strong>g-term indwelling foley ca<strong>the</strong>ters: a r<strong>and</strong>omized c<strong>on</strong>trolled study [abstract]. Infect C<strong>on</strong>trol 6:263-266.<br />

Talan DA, Stamm WE, Reuning-Scherer J, Church D, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis Investigators Group. 1998. Ciprofloxacin 7 day vs TMP-<br />

SMX 14 day + ceftriax<strong>on</strong>e for acute uncomplicated pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis: A r<strong>and</strong>omized, double-blind trial [abstract] 8th Internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

C<strong>on</strong>gress <strong>on</strong> Infectious Disease. Bost<strong>on</strong>, Mass.<br />

Thomps<strong>on</strong> RL, Haley CE, Seacy MA, Guen<strong>the</strong>r SM, Kaise DL, Groschel DH, et al. 1984. Failure to reduce attack rates using periodic<br />

instillati<strong>on</strong>s of a disinfectant into urinary drainage systems. JAMA 251:747-751.<br />

Tincello D, Richm<strong>on</strong>d DH. 1998. Evaluati<strong>on</strong> of reagent strips in detecting asymptomatic bacteriuria in early pregnancy: Prospective<br />

case series. BMJ 316:435-437.<br />

Tulkoff-Rubin NE, Rubin RH. 1997. Urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> immunocompromised host: Less<strong>on</strong>s from kidney transplantati<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> AIDS epidemic. Infect Dis Clin North Am 11:707-717.<br />

US Preventive Services Task Force. 1996. Guide to <str<strong>on</strong>g>Clinical</str<strong>on</strong>g> Preventive Services. Baltimore: William & Wilkins.<br />

VanDorsten P, Lenke RR, Schifrin GS. 1987. Pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis in pregnancy. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> role of in-hospital management <strong>and</strong> nitrofuranti<strong>on</strong><br />

suppressi<strong>on</strong>. J Rep pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:777-780. Med 32:895-900.Dorsten PJ, Bannister ER. 1986.<br />

Office diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria in Villar J, Lynd<strong>on</strong>-Rochelle MT, Gulmezoglo AM. 1998. Durati<strong>on</strong> of treatment of<br />

asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy. Cochrane Review. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Cochrane Library. (2).


Wadl<strong>and</strong>, William C, Plante, Dennis A. 1989. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: A decisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> cost-analysis. J<br />

Family <str<strong>on</strong>g>Practice</str<strong>on</strong>g> 29:372-376.<br />

Walter S, Pedersen FB, Vejlsgaaed R. 1975. Urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> wound infecti<strong>on</strong> in kidney transplant patients. Brit J Urol<br />

47:513-517.<br />

Ward G, Jorden RC, Severance HW. 1991. Treatment of pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis in an observati<strong>on</strong> unit. Ann Emerg Med 20-:258-261.<br />

Warren JW. 1997. Ca<strong>the</strong>ter-associated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Infect Dis Clin North Am 11:609-622.<br />

Warren JW, Anth<strong>on</strong>y WC, Hoopes JM, Muncie HL. 1982. Cephalexin for susceptible bacteriuria in afebrile,.l<strong>on</strong>g-term ca<strong>the</strong>terized<br />

patients. JAMA 248:454-458.<br />

Warren JW, Platt R, Thomas RJ, Rosner B, Kass EJ. 1978. Antibiotic irrigati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> ca<strong>the</strong>ter-associated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. N<br />

Engl J Med 299:570-573.<br />

Warren JW. 1997 Ca<strong>the</strong>ter-associated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Infect Dis Clinics North Am 11:609-622.<br />

Warren JW, Anth<strong>on</strong>y WC, Hoopes JM, Muncie HL. 1982 Cephalexin for susceptible bacteriuria in afebrile l<strong>on</strong>g term ca<strong>the</strong>terized<br />

patients. JAMA 248:454-458.<br />

Wilkie ME, Alm<strong>on</strong>d MK, Marsh FP. 1992. <strong>Diagnosis</strong> <strong>and</strong> management urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong> in adults BMJ 305:1137-1141.<br />

Willinam DN. 1996. Urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>: emerging insights into appropriate management. PostGrad Med 99:189-201.<br />

Willie JC, Blusse van Oud Alblas A, <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>wessen EA. 1993. Nosocomial ca<strong>the</strong>ter-associated bacteriuria: a clinical trail comparing two<br />

closed urinary drainage systems [abstract]. J Hosp Infect 25:191-198.<br />

Winst<strong>on</strong> DJ, Gale RP, Meyer DV, Young LS. 1979. Infectious complicati<strong>on</strong>s of human b<strong>on</strong>e marrow transplantati<strong>on</strong>. Medicine 58:1-<br />

31.<br />

W<strong>on</strong>g ES. 1983. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Guideline</str<strong>on</strong>g>s for preventi<strong>on</strong> of ca<strong>the</strong>ter-associated urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s. Am J Infect C<strong>on</strong>trol 11:28-36.<br />

W<strong>on</strong>g ES. 1985. Management of recurrent urinary tract infecti<strong>on</strong>s with patients-administered single-dose <strong>the</strong>rapy. Ann Intern Med<br />

102:302-7.<br />

W<strong>on</strong>g-Beringer A, Jacobs RA, Guglielmo J. 1992. Treatment of funguria. JAMA 267:2780-2785.<br />

Zhanel GG, Harding GKM, Guay DRP. 1990. Asymptomatic bacteriuria: which patients should be treated? Arch Intern Med<br />

150:1389-1397.<br />

Zhanel GG Harding GK Nicolle LE 1991. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in patients with diabetes mellitus. Rev Infect Dis 13:150-154.<br />

Zhanel GG, Harding GK, Nicolle LE. 1995. Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria <strong>and</strong> associated host factors in women with<br />

diabetes mellitus. Clin Infect Dis 21:316-322.<br />

FIGURE A. Algorithm for UTI<br />

VIII. ALGORITHMS


FIGURE B: Algorithm for Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis<br />

FIGURE C. Algorithm for Acute Uncomplicated Pyel<strong>on</strong>ephiritis


Categories reflecting <strong>the</strong> strength of recommendati<strong>on</strong><br />

Appendix 1<br />

Grading System for Recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

GRADE DEFINITION<br />

A Good evidence to support a recommendati<strong>on</strong> for use<br />

B Moderate evidence to support a recommendati<strong>on</strong> for use<br />

C Poor evidence to support a recommendati<strong>on</strong> for or against use<br />

D Moderate evidence to support a recommendati<strong>on</strong> against use<br />

E Good evidence to support a recommendati<strong>on</strong> against use<br />

Appendix 2<br />

Quality filters in assessing <strong>the</strong> evidence from <strong>the</strong> literature<br />

1. Studies <strong>on</strong> effectiveness of treatment <strong>and</strong> accuracy of diagnostic tests: Level of quality of evidence<br />

I Evidence from at least <strong>on</strong>e properly r<strong>and</strong>omized c<strong>on</strong>trolled trial.<br />

II Evidence from at least <strong>on</strong>e well-designed clinical trial without r<strong>and</strong>omizati<strong>on</strong>, from cohort or casec<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />

analytic studies (preferable from more than <strong>on</strong>e center), from multiple time-series studies, or<br />

from dramatic results in unc<strong>on</strong>trolled experiments.<br />

III Evidence from opini<strong>on</strong>s of respected authorities <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis of clinical experience, descriptive studies, or<br />

reports of expert committees.<br />

2. Studies <strong>on</strong> prognosis or causati<strong>on</strong>: Criteria for assessing quality of evidence<br />

A. An incepti<strong>on</strong> cohort was chosen.<br />

B. Reproducible <strong>and</strong> inclusi<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> exclusi<strong>on</strong> criteria were used.<br />

C. Follow-up was complete for at least 80% of subjects.<br />

D. Statistical adjustment was carried out for c<strong>on</strong>founders or extraneous factors.<br />

E. Reproducible descripti<strong>on</strong>s of outcome measures were used.<br />

Level of Quality of Evidence:<br />

I. All of <strong>the</strong> criteria were satisfied.<br />

II. An incepti<strong>on</strong> cohort was selected but <strong>on</strong>ly 3 of 4 remaining criteria were satisfied.<br />

III. An incepti<strong>on</strong> cohort was selected but <strong>on</strong>ly 2 of 4 remaining criteria were satisfied.<br />

IV. An incepti<strong>on</strong> cohort was selected but <strong>on</strong>ly 1 of 4 remaining criteria was satisfied<br />

V. N<strong>on</strong>e of <strong>the</strong> 5 criteria was met.<br />

Appendix 3<br />

Laboratory criteria for significant pyuria <strong>and</strong> bacteriuria<br />

Strength of Cut-off for Strength of<br />

Syndrome<br />

Cut-off for pyuria* recommendati<strong>on</strong> bacteriuria recommendati<strong>on</strong><br />

1. Acute uncomplicated a. ≥ 8 pus cells/ mm<br />

cystitis<br />

3 C<br />

≥ 100 cfu/ml<br />

A<br />

b. ≥ 5 pus cells/ hpf C<br />

≥ 1000 cfu/ml<br />

(clinical trials)<br />

C<br />

2. Acute uncomplicated<br />

pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis<br />

≥ 5 pus cells/hpf C ≥ 10,000 cfu/ml B<br />

3.Asymptomatic bacteriuria > 10 pus cells/ hpf C ≥ 100,000 cfu/ml A<br />

4. Complicated UTI ≥ 100,000 cfu/ml<br />

(with excepti<strong>on</strong>s) C<br />

5. UTI in males a. ≥ 10 pus<br />

cells/mm 3<br />

C ≥ 1000 cfu/ml C<br />

b. ≥ 5 pus cells/ hpf C<br />

*Pus cell per mm 3 <strong>and</strong> per hpf refer to number found in uncentrifuged <strong>and</strong> centrifuged urine respectively.


Key points about urine collecti<strong>on</strong>:<br />

Appendix 4<br />

1. Clean-voided urine is recommended for adult females.<br />

2. No special preparati<strong>on</strong> is needed to collect specimens from pre-pubertal females.<br />

3. No special preparati<strong>on</strong> is needed for males, but <strong>the</strong> foreskin should be retracted.<br />

4. Urethral ca<strong>the</strong>terizati<strong>on</strong> may be needed in adults who are suspected to have infecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> cannot provide a clean –<br />

voided specimen. In such case, <strong>the</strong> laboratory should be informed that <strong>the</strong> specimen is ca<strong>the</strong>terized urine.<br />

5. First void morning specimens yield <strong>the</strong> highest bacterial counts. In practice, <strong>the</strong> best time to collect is when patient<br />

is able to provide an adequate sample.<br />

6. Urine specimens should be delivered to <strong>the</strong> laboratory without delay <strong>and</strong> should be cultured within <strong>on</strong>e hour after<br />

voiding or be refrigerated.<br />

Instructi<strong>on</strong>s to <strong>the</strong> adult female to collect a clean-voided specimen:<br />

1. Remove underpants completely so <strong>the</strong>y will not get soiled.<br />

2. Sit backwards <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> toilet seat. Swing knee to <strong>the</strong> side as far as you can.<br />

3. Spread your genitals with <strong>on</strong>e h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinue to hold yourself spread while you clean <strong>and</strong> collect <strong>the</strong> specimen.<br />

4. Before you collect urine, clean between <strong>the</strong> folds of your genitals around <strong>the</strong> area from which you pass urine with<br />

soaped wash cloth, rinse <strong>the</strong> wash cloth with tap water, dry yourself with clean cloth <strong>and</strong> void into a clean jar with<br />

a screw-top lid.<br />

Adapted from Kunin CM 1997. Detecti<strong>on</strong>, Preventi<strong>on</strong> And Management of Urinary Tract Infecti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s that may be associated with sterile pyuria<br />

Appendix 5<br />

C<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong> during collecti<strong>on</strong> Vaginal secreti<strong>on</strong>s Foreskin secreti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

N<strong>on</strong>-infectious causes of pyuria Vesicoureteral reflux Hypercalcemic<br />

nephropathy<br />

Allergic interstitial<br />

nephritis<br />

Analgesic nephropathy Lithium toxicity Sickle cell disease<br />

Uric acid nephropathy Hyperoxalosis Sarcoidoisis<br />

Polycystic kidney Heavy metal toxicity Idiopathic interstitial<br />

cystitis<br />

Acute tubular necrosis Carcinoma of bladder Glomerul<strong>on</strong>ephritis<br />

Transplant rejecti<strong>on</strong> Renal calculi<br />

Infectious diseases Tuberculosis<br />

Chlamydial <strong>and</strong><br />

Leptospirosis<br />

g<strong>on</strong>ococcal urethritis<br />

Infecti<strong>on</strong>s adjacent to <strong>the</strong> urinary tract Appendicitis Diverticulitis<br />

Appendix 6<br />

Cost of oral drugs comm<strong>on</strong>ly used for UTI<br />

Viral cystitis<br />

Drug/Regimen 3-day 7-day 14-day<br />

Co-trimoxazole Generic 160/800 mg q 12h PhP 66.00 PhP 154.00 PhP 308.00<br />

Nitrofurantoin 100 mg q 6 h 178.20 415.80 831.60<br />

Amoxicillin/Clavulanate 375 mg q 8 h 546.48 1,575.12 3,150.24<br />

Ciprofloxacin 250 mg q 12 h 180.00 420.00 840.00<br />

500 mg q 12 h 245.70 573.30 1,146.60<br />

Ofloxacin 200 mg q 12 h 204.78 477.82 955.64<br />

400 mg q 12 h 256.02 597.38 1,194.76<br />

Norfloxacin 400 mg q 12 h 120.00 280.00 560.00<br />

200 mg q 12 h 87.00 203.00 406.00


Cost of antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens for recurrent UTI<br />

Daily Regimen Cost (pesos)/day<br />

Nitrofurantoin 50 mg 7.50<br />

Co-trimoxazole Generic 40/200 mg (1/2 tab) 6.40<br />

Norfloxacin 200 mg 14.50<br />

Cephalexin 250 mg 12.01<br />

500 mg 21.88<br />

Cost of parenteral regimens for UTI<br />

Drug/Regimen Cost (peso)/day<br />

Ampicillin (Generic) 1 g q 6h 406.40<br />

Ciprofloxacin 200 mg q 12h 1,638.00<br />

400 mg q 12h 3,276.00<br />

Ceftriax<strong>on</strong>e 2 g q 24h 1,910.00<br />

Co-trimoxazole 160/800 mg q 12h 555.00<br />

Gentamicin 240 mg q 24h 252.42<br />

Amikacin 1000 mg q 24h 1,580.00<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

Public Forum Participants: Regina P. Berba, MD, Ms. Caroline Bigornia, Dolores Banz<strong>on</strong>, MD, Vilma M. Co, MD,<br />

Ms. Julita Cabangbang, Loreto J. Codamos, MD, Marietta A. De Luna, MD, Mr. Tomas Eclipse, RN, Agnes Estrella,<br />

MD, Liberty Fajutrao, MD, Ant<strong>on</strong>io Feliciano, MD, Ruby T. Go, MD, Mr. Mike Gomez, Irmingarda Gueco, MD,<br />

Policarpio Joves, MD, Ms. Marcela Lagayan, Mary Ann D. Lansang, MD, Julius A. Lecci<strong>on</strong>es, MD, Ma. Lucille K.<br />

Ledesma, MD, Ricardo M. Manalastas, MD, Agnes D. Mejia, MD, Myrna T. Mendoza, MD, Oscar D. Naidas, MD,<br />

Benita A. Padilla, MD, Mr. Jesus Quiaz<strong>on</strong>, Ma. Rosarita Quijano, MD, Mrs. Nieves O. Rana, RN, Mediadora C. Saniel,<br />

MD, Dennis P. Serrano, MD, Jesus Emmanuel A.D. Sevilleja, MD, Erlinda L. Tiuseco, MD, Editha Garcia-Torres,<br />

MD, Ma. Lourdes Villa, MD.<br />

Instituti<strong>on</strong>s/Organizati<strong>on</strong>s represented: Department of Health (Public Health Office), FEU-NRMF College of<br />

Medicine, Makati Medical Center, Medical Observer, Nati<strong>on</strong>al Kidney <strong>and</strong> Transplant Institute, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Academy of<br />

Family Physicians, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Associati<strong>on</strong> of Medical Technologists, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Council for Health Research <strong>and</strong><br />

Development, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Diabetes Associati<strong>on</strong>, Philamcare Health Systems, Inc.,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nurses Associati<strong>on</strong>, Maternal <strong>and</strong> Child Nurses Associati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Obstetrics <strong>and</strong> Gynecological<br />

Society, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Society for Microbiology <strong>and</strong> Infectious Diseases, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Society of Nephrology, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Society of<br />

Venereologists, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Urological Associati<strong>on</strong>, Santo Tomas University Hospital, St. Luke’s Medical Center, <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Medical City,<br />

UP College of Medicine, UP-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> General Hospital, UP-PGH <str<strong>on</strong>g>Clinical</str<strong>on</strong>g> Epidemiology Unit, Warner Lambert.<br />

Acknowledgements to PSMID: For <strong>the</strong> initiative <strong>and</strong> effort of <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Society for Microbiology <strong>and</strong> Infectious<br />

Diseases in c<strong>on</strong>vening <strong>the</strong> PPGG-ID; to <strong>the</strong> present <strong>and</strong> past presidents <strong>and</strong> council members of PSMID for supporting<br />

<strong>the</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ards of Care agenda as flagship project of <strong>the</strong> Society.<br />

Acknowledgements for providing written comments <strong>and</strong> critique of CPGs: Angeles Tan-Alora, MD, C<strong>on</strong>rado S.<br />

Dayrit, MD, Ant<strong>on</strong>io Feliciano, MD, Deanne Campo-Cruz, MD, Raul Quillamor, MD.<br />

Acknowledgements for provisi<strong>on</strong>/retrieval of research materials: Benjamin M. Lims<strong>on</strong>, MD, Baxter <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g>s,<br />

MSD Resource Center, Pfizer Inc. Funding Sources: Pfizer Foundati<strong>on</strong>, Inc., World Health Organizati<strong>on</strong> (Western<br />

Pacific Regi<strong>on</strong>al Office), UP College of Medicine, UNILAB Bayanihan Faculty Grant, (awarded to Dr. Mediadora C.<br />

Saniel).<br />

Mediadora C. Saniel, MD<br />

(Chairman)<br />

Professor of Medicine<br />

College of Medicine<br />

University of <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

Infectious Diseases Secti<strong>on</strong>,<br />

Department of Medicine<br />

UP – <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> General Hospital<br />

Oscar D. Naidas, MD (Co-<br />

Chairman)<br />

Associate Professor<br />

Faculty of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Surgery<br />

Santo Tomas University


Cecilia S. Acuin, MD<br />

Assistant Professor<br />

College of Medicine De La Salle<br />

University<br />

Department of Family <strong>and</strong><br />

Community Medicine<br />

Loreto J. Codamos, MD<br />

Head, Research Committee<br />

Department of Medicine<br />

St. Luke’s Medical Center<br />

Ricardo M. Manalastas, Jr. MD<br />

Associate Professor<br />

Department of Obstetrics <strong>and</strong><br />

Gynecology<br />

UP- <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> General Hospital<br />

Adrian C. Peña, MD<br />

Associate Professor<br />

Chief<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> of Infectious Diseases<br />

Department of Medicine<br />

UERM Memorial Medical Center<br />

Evelyn T. Alesna, MD<br />

Infectious Diseases C<strong>on</strong>sultant<br />

Cebu City<br />

Mary Ann D. Lansang, MD<br />

Professor <str<strong>on</strong>g>Clinical</str<strong>on</strong>g> Epidemiology<br />

Unit <strong>and</strong> Infectious Diseases Secti<strong>on</strong><br />

Department of Medicine<br />

UP- <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> General Hospital<br />

Agnes D. Mejia, MD<br />

Associate Professor<br />

College of Medicine<br />

University of <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> of Nephrology<br />

Department of Medicine<br />

UP- <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> General Hospital<br />

Mrs. Nieves O. Rana, RN, MAN<br />

N6, UP-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> General Hospital<br />

Board Member<br />

Mo<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> Child Nurses<br />

Associati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

Member,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nurses Associati<strong>on</strong><br />

Editha M. Garcia-Torres, MD<br />

Associate Professor<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> of Microbiology <strong>and</strong><br />

Parasitology<br />

Department of Medicine <strong>and</strong><br />

Tropical Disease<br />

UST Hospital<br />

Regina P. Berba, MD<br />

Fellow, Infectious Diseases Secti<strong>on</strong><br />

UP- <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> General Hospital<br />

Ma. Lucille K. Ledesma, MD<br />

Fellow, Infectious Diseases <strong>and</strong> Tropical<br />

Medicine<br />

St. Luke’s Medical Center<br />

Benita S. Padilla, MD<br />

Head,<br />

Emergency Room <strong>and</strong> Outpatient<br />

Department,<br />

UP-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> General Hospital<br />

Nati<strong>on</strong>al Kidney <strong>and</strong> Transplant Institute<br />

Board Member<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g> Society of Nephrology<br />

Dennis P. Serrano, MD<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Clinical</str<strong>on</strong>g> Associate Professor<br />

Department of Surgery<br />

College of Medicine<br />

University of <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Philippine</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

Expert Panel: Clayt<strong>on</strong> Blas, MD, Deanne Campo-Cruz MBA, Tomas Eclipse, RN, MBA, Agnes Estrella, MD, Liberty<br />

Fajutrao, MD, Irmingrada Gueco, MD, Ofelia Javellana, MD, Policarpio Joves, MD, Ricardo Manalastas, MD, Raul<br />

Quillamor, MD, Jesus Emmanuel Seveillaja, MD, Ariel Zerrudo, MD.<br />

PPGG-ID Coordinator: Julius A. Lecci<strong>on</strong>es, MD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!